Skip to main content

Toward a Productive Interaction Between Simulations and Theory in Economic Science

  • Chapter
Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress
  • 596 Accesses

Abstract

A productive interaction between simulation and theory is required. This is not a simple appeal for a new collaboration. A paradigm change depends on it. More than 30 years have passed since everybody talked about paradigm change in economics. But no such thing occurred. In 1907’s, necessity was evident but no way was indicated for the change. Arrival of agent based simulation may change the situation. It may break the long stagnation of economics and may produce a long wanted paradigm change. For this to happen, a good productive interaction between simulation and theory is necessary. The precondition to this collaboration is to conceive the real problems which lie at the base of economic science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Buchanan, James M., & Yong J. Yoon, 1994, The Return to Increasing Returns, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clower, R., 1975, “Reflections on the Keynesian Perplex,” Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie 35, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffeo, E., M. Catalano, F. Clementi, D. Delli Gatti, M. Gallegati, and A. Russo, 2006 “Reflections on Modern Macroeconomics: Can We Travel Along a Safer Road?”, a paper presented at 2nd Polish Symposium on Econo-and Sociophysics, Crakow, 21–22 April, 2006. To be published in Acta Phys. Pol. B. Available at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0608/0608148.pdf URL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R., 1974, The Crisis in Keynesian Economics, Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.G., 1974, “The Current and Perspective state of Economics”, American Economic Papers, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N., 1972, “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics,” Economic Journal, 82, 1237–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, Janos, 1971, Anti-Equilibrium: on Economic Systems Theory and the Tasks of Research, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud, A., 1973, “Life among the Econ,” Western Economic Journal, 11, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W.W., 1971, “Theoretical Assumptions and Noobservable Facts,” American Economic Review, 61, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Yoshihiro (Ed.),2006, U-Mart, A pamphlet issued by the U-Mart Project. Available at http://www.u-mart.org URL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps Brown, E.H., 1972, “The Underdevelppment of Economiocs,” Economic Journal, 82, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J., 1974a, “The Second Crisis of Economic Theory,” American Economic Review, 64, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J., 1974b, History versus Equilibrium, London Thames Polytechnic. Reprinted in J. Robinson, Contributions to Modern Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 126-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiozawa, Yoshinori, 1989, “The Primacy of Stationarity,” Osaka City University Economic Review, 24(1), pp..

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiozawa, Yoshinori,2004, “Evolutionary Economics in the 21st Century: A Manifest”, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 1(1), 5–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M., 1970, “A Curmudgeon’s Guide to Macroeconomics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 8, 405–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, B., 1972, What’s Wrong with Economics, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. 1948, “Science and complexity”, American Scientist, 36, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worwick, G.D.N., 1972, “Is Progress in Economic Science Possible?”, Economic Journal, 82, 7–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Xiaokai, Wenli Cheng, Heling Shi and Christis G. Tombazos (Eds.),2005, an Inframarginal Approach to Trade Theory, Increasing Returns and Inframarginal Economics, Vol.1, Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shiozawa, Y. (2007). Toward a Productive Interaction Between Simulations and Theory in Economic Science. In: Takahashi, S., Sallach, D., Rouchier, J. (eds) Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73167-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73167-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-73150-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-73167-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics