Skip to main content

What are the essential features of renal neoplasms based on the current (2004) WHO classification system? What is the clinical implication of the new classification? How does the Fuhrman grading system work? What are the factors affecting survival of renal cell carcinoma patients?

  • Chapter
Questions in Daily Urologic Practice
  • 1183 Accesses

Abstract

Renal cell neoplasms are classified histologically into several types (Table 2-1-1). The four most common types of renal cell neoplasms are clear cell (51%–83%), papillary (11%–20%), and chromophobe (4%–6%) renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and (benign) oncocytoma (4%–8%). Uncommon tumors, which account for 5%–10% of renal neoplasms, include collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, and unclassifiable carcinoma, which does not fit any defined category. Unclassifiable RCCs and collecting duct carcinoma are the most aggressive followed by, in descending order of aggressiveness, clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, and chromophobe carcinomas. Factors significantly affecting the cancer-specific survival are pathologic stage, nuclear grade, the presence of tumor necrosis, the histologic tumor type, and the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. WHO classification of tumours of the kidney (2004). In: Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA (eds) Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon, p 10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Storkel S, Eble JN, Adlakha K, Amin M, Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Darson M, Delahunt B, Iczkowski K (1997) Classification of renal cell carcinoma; Work-group No. 1 (1997) Union Internationale Centre Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer 80:987–989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6:655–663.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin MaB, Amin MiB, Tamboli P, Javidan J, Stricker H, De-Peralta Ventrina M, Deshpande A, Menon M (2002) Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms. An experience of 405 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 26:281–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lohse CM, Blute ML, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Cheville JC (2002) Comparison of standardized and nonstandardized nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma to predict outcome among 2,042 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 118:877–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ (2000) Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classificaion and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma. A Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 89:604–614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML (2003) Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27:612–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Leibovich BC, Frank I, Blute ML (2004) Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. An examination of underlying histologic subtype and an analysis of association with patient outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 28:435–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thoenes W, Storkel S, Rumpelt HJ (1986) Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas and carcinomas). The basic cytological and histological elements and their use for diagnostics. Pathol Res Pract 181:125–143.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Storkel S, Thoenes W, Jacobi GH, Lippold R (1989) Prognostic parameters in renal cell carcinoma: A new approach. Eur Urol 16:416–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Delahunt B, Nacey JN (1987) Renal cell carcinoma, II: histological indicators of prognosis. Pathology 19: 258–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Leibovich BC, Zincke H (2003) A multifactorial postoperative surveillance model for patients with surgically treated clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 170:2225–2232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). What are the essential features of renal neoplasms based on the current (2004) WHO classification system? What is the clinical implication of the new classification? How does the Fuhrman grading system work? What are the factors affecting survival of renal cell carcinoma patients?. In: Questions in Daily Urologic Practice. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-72819-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-72819-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-72818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-72819-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics