Skip to main content

Biomechanical Aspects of Knee Implant Design

  • Conference paper
Joint Arthroplasty
  • 192 Accesses

Summary

Influence of design for long-term performance in total knee arthroplasty is discussed. Factors affecting the results were prevention of aseptic loosening and antiwear design; therefore, tibiofemoral surface geometry should be designed as “double dish” or “spherical” shape. When using this geometry without cement, secure initial fixation should be required. Anti-wear design and range of motion present a dilemma, but a retention of posterior cruciate ligament and the design of posterior femoral condyles with short height and small radius could present an alternative solution. Conventional dome shape, avoiding metal backing, will be a standard for the patella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hoshino A (1992) Biomechanical aspect of the recent artificial knee design (in Japanese). J Joint Surg 11: 1403–1411

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Society for Testing and Materials (1989) Standard specification for ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene powder and fabricated forms for surgical implants, F 648–84. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 13. 01, pp 186–188

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li S (1994) The identification of defects in ultra high molecular weight polyethlene. Trans Orthop Res Soc 19: 587

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coventry MB, Finerman GAM, Riley LH et al (1972) A new geometric knee for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 94: 171–184

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moran CG, Pinder IM, Lees TA et al (1991) Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73A: 848–857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto S, Nakata S, Kondo Y (1989) A follow-up study of an uncemented knee replacement. The results of 312 knees using Kodama-Yamamoto prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 71B: 505–508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoshino A, Desjardins D, Laird L et al (1997) Efficacy of screw fixation in cementless total knee arthroplasty (in Japanese). J Jpn Orthop Assoc 71: s227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA et al (1995) Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 77B: 884–889

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1995) The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 77A: 1713–1720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kocmond JH, Delp SL, Stern SH (1995) Stability and range of motion of Insall-Burstein condylar prosthesis: a computer simulation study. J Arthroplasty 10: 383–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoshino A (1997) Influence of design on the range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. In: Niwa S, Yoshino S, Kurosaka M, Shino K, Yamamoto S (eds) Reconstruction of the knee joint. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 324–329

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright TM, Bartel DL (1986) The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee components. Clin Orthop 205: 67–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford Knee. Clin Orthop 205: 21–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buechal FF, Pappas MJ (1990) Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate sparing versus cruciate sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop 260: 162–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoshino, A. (1999). Biomechanical Aspects of Knee Implant Design. In: Imura, S., Wada, M., Omori, H. (eds) Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68529-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68529-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68531-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68529-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics