Skip to main content

Fault-Tolerance and Error Recovery in an Autonomous Robot with Distributed Controlled Components

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Most of the existing autonomous robot systems have a centralized hierarchical control architecture. In such robot systems, all planning, execution control, and monitoring tasks are performed by a single control unit on a defined level. In case of an error that occurs during the execution, this central control unit has the complete knowledge about the past executed actions and is able to reason on the error situation. Besides the centralized control architectures, distributed and decentralized control architectures have been developed to overcome some problems with the centralized systems. Because of the missing overall control, error recovery is more difficult than in centralized systems. This paper presents concepts to obtain fault-tolerance behaviour and error recovery in a distributed controlled robot system. As an example for such a robot system, the Karlsruhe Autonomous Mobile Robot KAMRO is considered that is being developed at IPR. Many experiments were performed with the former centralized control architecture. Our intention is to achieve the same and better results with the distributed control architecture KAMARA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albus, LS., Barbera, AJ., Nagel, R.N.: Theory and practice of hierarchical control. Proceedings of IEEE Comp. Soc. Int. Conf., 1981, pp. 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fukuda, T.; Buss, M.; Hosokai, H.; Kawauchi, Y.: Cell Structured Robotic System CEBOT — Control, Planning and Communication Methods-. Proceedings of IAS Intelligent Autonomous Systems, Amsterdam, December, 11–14, 1989, pp. 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asama, H.; Ozaki, K.; Ishida, Y.; Habib, M.K., Matsumoto, A.; Endo, I.: Negotiation between Multiple Mobile Robots and An Environment Manager. Proceedings of 5th ICAR Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy, June, 4–6, 1991, pp. 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kotoska, S.; Asama, H.; Kaetsu, H.; Ohmori, H.; Endo, I.; Sato, K.; Okada, S.; Nakayama, R.: Development of a functionally adaptive and robust manipulator. Proceedings of DARS Int. Symp. on Distributed Autonomous Robotic System, Wako, Japan, Sep. 21–22, 1992, pp. 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hörmann, K.; Rembold, U.: A Robot Action Planner for Automatic Parts Assembly. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ Int’l Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 1988, pp. 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frommherz, B.; Werling, G.: Generating Robot Action Plans by Means of an Heuristic Search. Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 13–18, 1990, pp. 884–889.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hörmann, A.; Meier, W.; Schloen, J.: A Control Architecture for an Advanced Fault-Tolerant Robot System. Proceedings of Intelligent Autonomous Systems, Amsterdam, December, 11–14, 1989, pp. 576–585.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng, X.; Kappey, D.; Schloen, J.: Elements of an Advanced Robot Control System for Assembly Tasks. Proceedings of Int’l Conf. on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy, June, 4–6, 1991, pp. 411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hörmann, A.; Rembold, U.: Development of an Advanced Robot for Autonomous Assembly. Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California, April 1991, pp. 2452–2457.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lueth, T.C.; Rembold, U.: Extensive Manipulation Capabilities and Reliable Behavior at Autononomous Robot Assembly. Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, May 8–13,1994, pp. 3495–3500.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lueth, T.C.; Laengle, Th.: Task Description, Decomposition, and Allocation in a Distributed Autonomous Multi-Agent Robot System. Proceedings of IROS IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Munich, Germany, Sep. 12–16, 1994, pp. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trevelyan, J.P, Nelson, M.: Adaptive robot control incorporating automatic error recovery. Proceedings of IInternational Conference on Advanced Robotics, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivas, S: Error recovery in robot systems. PhD Theses, California Institute of Technology, 1977

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lueth, T.C., Laengle, T. (1994). Fault-Tolerance and Error Recovery in an Autonomous Robot with Distributed Controlled Components. In: Asama, H., Fukuda, T., Arai, T., Endo, I. (eds) Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68275-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68275-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68277-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68275-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics