Skip to main content

Postural Sway Biofeedback Training in Congenitally Blind Children

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The aim of this experiment was to determine whether or not congenitally blind children were able to control postural sway under auditory feedback and to examine the effect of such training in congenitally blind children. To assess postural control, a newly developed apparatus was used. Seven untrained congenitally blind children, aged 6 to 10 years, were tested on a force plate. When anteroposterior sway stayed within 10mm in the sagittal plane, no auditory feedback was given. If anteroposterior sway was more than 10mm, they were presented with a 500-Hz pure tone with a speaker. The width of 10 mm corresponded to approximately 80% of the amplitude of anteroposterior sway in each subject. Information about lateral sway was not provided. Time taken while anteroposterior sway exceeded and returned to the width of 10 mm was defined as the response time to a 500-Hz pure tone. Subjects stood for 60s on a force plate with arms held at the sides and feet together, and performed three trials for each training session. Training sessions were done once a week for five consecutive weeks. The results showed that the total time for which postural sway deviated from the width of 10 mm decreased as training continued. The results also indicated that the response time to the 500-Hz pure tone became shorter as training progressed. It is apparent that congenitally blind children changed their pattern of posture movements for postural correction; it may be associated with changes in postural strategy. Congenitally blind children may be refining their interpretation of auditory feedback and learning to integrate it in the control of posture. We will call the ability of the remaining sensory systems to control posture “nonvisual postural control systems”. In conclusion, it was found that postural sway biofeedback training was effective for the assessment of postural control in congenitally blind children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Edwards AS (1946) Body sway and vision. J Exp Psychol 36:526–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leonard JA (1969) Static and mobile balancing performance of blind adolescent grammar school children. New Outlook Blind 63:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gipsman SC (1981) Effect of visual condition on use of proprioceptive cues in performing a balance task. J Vis Impair Blindness 75(2):50–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ribadi H, Rider RA, Toole T (1987) A comparison of static and dynamic balance in congenitally blind, sighted, and sighted blindfolded adolescents. Adapt Phys Activity Quart 4:220–225

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakata H (1983) Postural controllabilities of the visually impaired in maintaining upright standing posture (In Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Hum Posture 3:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A (1990) Changes in posture control across the life span—A system approach. Physical Therapy 70:799–807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55:1369–1381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horak FB, Nashner LM, Diener HC (1990) Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 82:167–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Starkes J, Riach C, Clarke B (1992) The effect of eye closure on postural sway: converging evidence from children and a Parkinson patient. In: Proteau L, Elliot D (eds) Vision and motor control. North-Holland, pp 353–373

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy FM, O’Driscoll M (1989) Observations on the motor development of visually impaired children. Physiotherapy 75:505–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakata H (1990) Development of auditory reaction times, using fine and gross motor movements in visually impaired children. In: Kaneko M (ed) Fitness for the aged, disabled, and industrial worker. International series on sport sciences, vol 20. Human Kinetics, pp 148–153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buell C (1950) Motor performance of visually handicapped children. Except Child 17:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burton AW, Walter ED (1992) Assessing balance in adapted physical education: fundamental concepts and applications. Adapt Phys Activity Quart 9:14–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nakata, H., Enzaki, Y., Yabe, K. (1994). Postural Sway Biofeedback Training in Congenitally Blind Children. In: Yabe, K., Kusano, K., Nakata, H. (eds) Adapted Physical Activity. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68272-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68272-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68274-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68272-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics