Skip to main content

The Effect of Flexibility and Central Stem of the Cementless Total Knee Tibial Tray on Initial Fixation

  • Chapter
Biomechanics in Orthopedics
  • 336 Accesses

Summary

The effect of material properties, central stem and its length on tibial tray micromovements were investigated using 100 preserved cadaver tibias. Both axial and shear tests were performed on independent specimens. Axial compressive loads of 100 kg were applied to the anterolateral portion of tibial trays in axial loading tests. Subsidence on the loaded side, lift-off on the contralateral side, micromotions on both sides, and bending of the tray were measured. There was significantly less subsidence, micromotion, and lift-off with the softer Ti6A14V trays than with the harder CoCr trays. Less subsidence and lift-off were also demonstrated in trays with a long central stem when compared to the other stem groups. For shear loading tests, shear loads of 25 kg were applied to the central portion of the posterior rim of the tray anteriorly. Subsidence and micromotion were measured on the medial and lateral side of the trays, and the mean values were statistically determined for each group. The presence of a central stem significantly reduced both subsidence and micromotion regardless of stem length. Therefore, we concluded that the flexible Ti6A14V tibial tray remains in better contact with the cut tibial bone surface than the more rigid CoCr tray during eccentric loading. We also concluded that the tibial tray with a long stem can achieve better initial fixation of the implant to bone when compared to the short stem and no stem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Miura H, Whiteside LA, Easley JC, Amador DD (1990) Effects of screws and sleeve on initial fixation in uncemented total knee tibial component. Clin Orthop Rel Res 259: 160–168

    Google Scholar 

  2. Volz RG, Nisbet JK, Lee RW, McMurtry MC (1988) The mechanical stability of various noncemented tibial components. Clin Orthop Rel Res 226: 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sumner DR, Jacobs JJ, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO (1989) The amount and distribution of bone ingrowth in tibial components retrieved from human patients. Trans ORS 14: 375

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall JN (1982) Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64: 1026

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crowninshield RD, Murase K, Pedersen DR (1983) An analysis of tibial component design in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 16: 13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dempsey AJ, Finlay JB, Boume RB, Rorabeck CH, Scott MA, Millman JC (1989) Stability and anchorage considerations for cementless tibial components. J Arthroplasty 4: 223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manley MT, Stulberg BN, Stern LS, Watson JT (1987) Direct observation of micromotion at the implant-bone interface with cemented and non-cemented tibial components. Trans Orthop Res Soc 12: 436

    Google Scholar 

  8. Samuelson K (1988) Bone grafting and noncemented revision arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Rel Res 226: 93

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shimagaki H, Bechtold JE, Sherman R, Gustilo RB (1988) Initial stability of tibial components in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Trans ORS 13: 477

    Google Scholar 

  10. Strickland AB, Chan KH, Andriacchi TP, Miller J (1988) The initial fixation of porous coated tibial components evaluated by the study of rigid body motion under static load. Trans ORS 13: 476

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whiteside LA, Pafford J (1989) Load characteristics of a non-cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 239: 168–177

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hvid I, Hansen SL (1985) Trabecular bone strength patterns at the proximal tibial epiphysis. J Orthop Res 3: 464–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Rosenquist R, Selvik G (1986) Tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 213: 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murase K, Crowninshield RD, Pedersen DR, Chang T (1983) An analysis of tibial component design in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 16: 13–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1982) The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair climbing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64: 1328–1335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yoshii, I., Whiteside, L.A. (1992). The Effect of Flexibility and Central Stem of the Cementless Total Knee Tibial Tray on Initial Fixation. In: Niwa, S., Perren, S.M., Hattori, T. (eds) Biomechanics in Orthopedics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68216-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68216-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68218-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68216-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics