Advertisement

Hydrocephalus pp 375-382 | Cite as

Importance of Anti-Siphon Devices in Shunt Therapy of Pediatric and Adolescent Hydrocephalus

  • Yasuhiro Chiba
  • Kazuhiko Tokoro
  • Hiroyuki Abe

Summary

A Slit-like ventricle (SLV) is occasionally observed on computerized tomography (CT) scans in pediatric hydrocephalus. The incidence of SLV was investigated in 64 pediatrie and adolescent patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts in relation to their activity of daily living (ADL) and to the presence or absence of an anti-siphon device (ASD). Patients were divided into three groups. Group A had full ADL and shunt systems with ASDs. Group B had full ADL and shunt systems without ASDs. Group C consisted of bedridden patients without ASDs in their shunt systems. All patients had hypertensive hydrocephalus. All but two had ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Medium pressure valves were inserted in all. The average follow-up period was 8.8 years. The incidence of SLV was 7.4% in group A, 53.1% in group B, 20% in group C, and 31.3% for all groups. Group A had a signicantly lower incidence of SLV than group B (X2 test, P < 0.001). One patient in group B developed slit ventricle syndrome. The CSF flow patterns through the shunt were examined using our thermosensitive technique. A rapid flow pattern was observed in most of group B. By contrast, this pattern was observed in only a few cases in group A. SLV appeared in only one out of four cases in group C despite the rapid CSF flow during positional changes.

In conclusion, ASDs in the shunt system played an important role in reducing the incidence of SLV in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus, but some work on the use of ASDs for treating tall adolescent patients will still be necessary because of the large hydrostatic pressure involved.

Keywords

Anti-siphon device Slit-like ventricle Hydrocephalus Ventriculoperitoneal shunt Thermistor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chapman PH (1990) Hydrocephalus in childhood. In: Youmans JR (ed) Neurological Surgery, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1236–1276Google Scholar
  2. Chiba Y, Yuda K (1980) Thermosensitive determination of CSF shunt patency with a pair of small disc thermistors. J Neurosurg 52: 700–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiba Y, Ishiwata Y, Suzuki N, Muramoto M, Kunimi Y (1985) Thermosensitive determination of obstructed sites in ventriculoperitoneal shunts. J Neurosurg 62: 363–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Epstein F, Fleischer AS, Hochwald GM, Ransohoff J (1974) Subtemporal craniectomy for recurrent shunt obstruction secondary to small ventricles. J Neurosurg 41: 29–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruber R (1981) The relationship of ventricular shunt complications to the chronic overdrainage syndrome: A follow-up study. Z Kinderchir 34: 346–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experiences with the anti-siphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61: 156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holness RO, Hoffmann HJ, Hendrick EB (1979) Subtemporal decompression for the slit-ventricle syndrome after shunting in hydrocephalic children. Childs Brain 5: 137–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Keucher TR, Mealy JJ (1979) Long-term results after ventriculoatrial and ventriculoperitoneal shunting for infantile hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 50: 179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kiekens R, Mortier W, Pothmann R, Bock WJ, Seibert H (1982) The slit ventricle syndrome after shunting in hydrocephalic children. Neuropediatrics 13: 190–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McCullough DC (1986) Symptomatic progressive ventriculomegaly in hydrocephalies with patent shunts and anti-syphon devices. Neurosurgery 19: 617–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCullough DC, Wells M (1982) Complications with antisiphon devices in hydrocephalies with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. In: Epstein F, Raimondi AJ (eds) Concepts in pediatrie neurosurgery, vol. 2. Karger, Basel, pp 63–75Google Scholar
  12. Nakada Y, Enomoto T, Maki Y (1982) Clinical and computed tomographical analysis of hydrocephalie children showing slit-like ventricle after shunt operation (in Japanese). Shoni no No-shinkei 7: 59–66Google Scholar
  13. Oi S (1983) Slit-like ventricle and isolation of CSF pathway as complication of shunt procedure in child hydrocephalus (Part-1). The pathophysiology and clinical problems (in Japanese). Shoni no No-shinkei 8: 107–117Google Scholar
  14. Oi S, Matsumoto S (1983) Complications (slit ventricle, isolated fourth ventricle) of shunt procedure in child hydrocephalus (in Japanese). No to Hattatsu 15: 199–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL, Croissant PD, Tripp L (1973) Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38: 729–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salmon JH (1978) The collapsed ventricle: management and prevention. Surg Neurol 9: 349–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Seida M, Ito U, Tomida S, Yamazaki, Inaba Y (1987) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction with anti-siphon device in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Report of three cases (in Japanese). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 27: 769–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tani S, Kumamura Y, Kusano T, Yamanouchi Y, Matsumura H (1981) Clinical analysis of 13 hydrocephalic children with slit-like ventricles caused by shunt procedures (in Japanese). Shoni no No-shinkei 6: 33–40Google Scholar
  19. Tokoro K, Chiba Y (1989) Effects on shunt flow of position of anti-siphon device and of changes in posture in hydrocephalus (abstract). Ninth International Congress of Neurological Surgery, New Delhi, India, p 100Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuhiro Chiba
  • Kazuhiko Tokoro
  • Hiroyuki Abe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryKanagawa Rehabilitation CenterAtsugiJapan

Personalised recommendations