Advertisement

Hydrocephalus pp 237-247 | Cite as

Cerebral Evoked Potentials in Rats with Congenital Hydrocephalus

  • Kozo Mutoh
  • Takehiko Okuno
  • Masatoshi Ito
  • Haruki Mikawa

Summary

Cerebral evoked potentials were recorded, in a congenitally hydrocephalic rat strain, HTX, after unilateral forepaw electrical stimulation and monocular flash stimulation. In the hydrocephalic HTX rats, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were delayed in latency and reduced in amplitude, except for the first cortical positive wave, which was probably subcortical in origin. Therefore, central conduction time was prolonged. The degree of SEP abnormality was inversely correlated with the thickness of the cerebral mantle and SEPs were directly correlated to the pathological severity of hydrocephalus. By contrast, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in the hydrocephalic group were unaltered when compared with the non-hydrocephalic group, and VEPs were considered less sensitive than SEPs. However, VEPs were abnormal in the four hydrocephalic rats that showed severe behavioral deterioration and were considered to be related to the behavioral alterations.

The HTX strain rats were considered to be appropriate for studying the clinical relevance of cerebral evoked potentials and for further elucidating the mechanism of evoked potential abnormalities in congenital hydrocephalus.

Keywords

Cerebral evoked potentials Congenital hydrocephalus HTX strain rat Somatosensory evoked potentials Visual evoked potentials 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alani AM (1985) Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 62: 234–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison T, Hume AL (1981) A comparative analysis of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat. Exp Neurol 72: 592–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehle A, Sklar F (1979) Visual evoked potentials in infants with hydrocephalus. Neurology (NY) 29: 1541–1544Google Scholar
  4. Guthkelch AN, Sclabassi RJ, Vries JK (1982) Changes in the visual evoked potentials in hydrocephalic children. Neurosurgery 11: 599–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guthkelch AN, Sclabassi RJ, Hirsch RP, Vries JK (1984) Visual evoked potentials in hydrocephalus: Relationship to head size, shunting, and mental development. Neurosurgery 14: 283–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohn DF, Chinookoswong N, Chou SM (1981) A new model of congenital hydrocephalus in the rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 54: 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McSherry JW, Walters CL, Horbar JD (1982) Acute visual evoked potential changes in hydrocephalus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53: 331–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mutoh K, Okuno T, Ito M, Mikawa H (1988a) Effects of pentobarbital on visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in adult rats. Ann Paediatr Jpn 34: 73–79Google Scholar
  9. Mutoh K, Okuno T, Nakano S, Mikawa H, Moritake K, Kikuchi H (1988b) Visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in hydrocephalus. Ann Paediatr Jpn 34: 1–3Google Scholar
  10. Nagao S, Roccaforte P, Moody RA (1979) Acute intracranial hypertension and auditory brain-stem responses. Part 1: Changes in the auditory brain-stem and somatosensory evoked responses in intracranial hypertension in cats. J Neurosurg 51: 669–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Brien MS (1982) Hydrocephalus in children. In: Youmans JR (ed) Neurological surgery, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1381–1422Google Scholar
  12. Onofrj M, Harnois C, Bodis-Wollner I (1985) The hemispheric distribution of the transient rat VEP: A comparison of flash and pattern stimulation. Exp Brain Res 59: 427–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paxinos G, Watson C (1986) The rat brain in the stereotaxic coordinates, 2nd edn. Academic, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  14. Sklar F, Ehle A, Clark WK (1979) Visual evoked potentials: A noninvasive technique to monitor patients with shunted hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 4: 529–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutton LN, Cho B, Jaggi J, Joseph PM, Bruce DA (1986) Effects of hydrocephalus and intracranial pressure on auditory and somatosensory evoked responses. Neurosurgery 18: 756–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wiederholt WC, Iragui-Madoz VJ (1977) Far field somatosensory potentials in the rat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42: 456–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Witzmann A (1990) Changes of somatosensory evoked potentials with increase of intracranial pressure in the rat’s brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 77: 59–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. York DH, Pulliam MW, Rosenfeld JG, Watts C (1981) Relationship between visual evoked potentials and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 55: 909–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kozo Mutoh
  • Takehiko Okuno
  • Masatoshi Ito
  • Haruki Mikawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyoto, 606Japan

Personalised recommendations