Skip to main content

Complex Space Models for the Analysis of Asymmetry

  • Conference paper
Measurement and Multivariate Analysis

Summary

Two kinds of complex space models are discussed for the analysis of asymmetry. One is the H Ermitian Form Asymmetric multidimensional Scaling for Interval Data (EFASID), which is a version of Hermitian Form Model (HFM) for the analysis of one-mode two-way asymmetric relational data proposed by Chino and Shiraiwa (1993). It was first proposed by Chino (1999). Some results from simulations of EFASID are reported. The other is a possible complex difference system model for the analysis of two-mode three-way asymmetric relational data. Implications of such a complex difference system model are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chino, N. (1977). N-ko no taishokan no hitaisyo na kannkei wo zusikikasuru tameno ichi giho. [A graphical technique for representing the asymmetric relationships between N objects]. Proceedings of the 5th annual meeting of the Behaviormetric Society of Japan (pp.146–149)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chino, N. (1978). A graphical technique for representing the asymmetric relationships between N objects. Behaviormetrika, 5, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chino, N. (1990). A generalized inner product model for the analysis of asymmetry. Behaviormetrika, 27, 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chino, N. (1999). A Hermitian form asymmetric MDS for interval data. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of The Behaviormetric Society of Japan. 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chino, N. (2000). Complex difference system models of social interaction.–Preliminary considerations and a simulation study. Bulletin of The Faculty of Letters of Aichi Gakuirt University, 30, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chino, N., and Shiraiwa, K. (1993). Geometrical structures of some non-distance models for asymmetric MDS. Behaviormetrika, 20, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, A. G. and Gower, J. C. (1978). Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices. Applied Statistics, 27, 297–304.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Escoufier, Y., and Grorud, A. (1980). Analyse factorielle des matrices carrees non symetriques. In E. Diday et al. (Eds.) Data Analysis and Informatics (pp. 263–276 ). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. (1977). The analysis of asymmetry and orthogonality. In J.R. Barra, F. Brodeau, G. Romer, and B. van Cutsem (Eds.), Recent Developments in Statistics (pp. 109–123 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshman, R. A. (1978). Models for analysis of asymmetrical relationships among N objects or stimuli. Paper presented at the First Joint Meeting of the Psychometric Society and The Society for Mathematical Psychology, Hamilton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshman, R. A., Green, P. E., Wind, Y., and Lundy, M. E. (1982). A model for the analysis of asymmetric data in marketing research. Marketing Science, 1, 205–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, H. A. L., and Takane, Y. (1994). A generalization of GIPSCAL for the analysis of asymmetric data. Journal of Classification, 11, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). Fractals: Form, chance, and dimension. San Francisco: Freeman.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A., and Imaizumi, T. (1987). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximities. Behaviormetrika, 21, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A., and Imaizumi, T. (1997). Asymmetric multidimensional scaling of two-mode three-way proximities. Journal of Classification., 14, 195–224.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, T. (1991). Analysis of asymmetric proximity matrix by a model of distance and additive terms. Behaysorrnetrika, 29, 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, T., and Takeda, S. (1990). Multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximity: model and method. Behaviormetrika, 28, 49–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Y. (1988). An analysis of sociometric data by MDS in Minkowski space. In K. Matsusita (Ed.), Statistical Theory and Data Analysis II (pp. 385–396 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F. W. (1975). An asymmetric Euclidean model for multi-process asymmetric data. Paper presented at U.S.-Japan Seminar on MDS, San Diego, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, D. G., and Bentler, P. M. (1982). Restricted multidimensional scaling models for asymmetric proximities. Psychometrika, 47, 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chino, N. (2002). Complex Space Models for the Analysis of Asymmetry. In: Nishisato, S., Baba, Y., Bozdogan, H., Kanefuji, K. (eds) Measurement and Multivariate Analysis. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65955-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65955-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-65957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-65955-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics