Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Treatment for Varicocele Testis: Current Status

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Recent Advances in Endourology ((ENDOUROLOGY,volume 1))

Summary

To minimize the invasiveness of surgical treatment for varicocele testis, laparoscopic varicocele ligation was developed in 1990. In principle, the laparoscopic procedure is similar to open high ligation, where the objective is to occlude the internal spermatic veins cephalad to the internal inguinal ring. Thirty-six papers were published in English between 1990 and 1997 and were reviewed. A total of 1551 patients were treated laparoscopically, resulting in a 99.0% success rate, with an average operative time of 60.7 min. Perioperative complications occurred in 5.7% of the patients, the majority of which were minor and subsided without specific treatment. Postoperative hydrocele was noted in 1.3% of the patients. The effects of laparoscopic varicocele ligation were similar to those of open high ligation, with a persistence or recurrence rate of 5.2%, a rate of improvement in semen quality of 58.4%, and a pregnancy rate of 29.1%. With regard to convalescence, the laparoscopic procedure resulted in less postoperative pain and a shorter recovery period in comparison with open high ligation, although the comparison with inguinal/ subinguinal ligation under local anesthesia was not favorable. Patients with bilateral varicocele testes should benefit from the procedure, because the opposite internal spermatic vein could be accessed without additional ports. The major disadvantages of the laparoscopic approach are the requirement of general anesthesia, the possibility of serious complications related to laparoscopic procedures, and the high cost because of the use of disposable instruments. In conclusion, it is now difficult to consider laparoscopic varicocele ligation less invasive than the subinguinal open surgical approach using local anesthesia for unilateral varicocele testis. In the near future, however, further improvements in surgical instruments, particularly microlaparoscopic instruments, may significantly reduce the convalescence period associated with the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Oster J (1971) Varicocele in children and adolescents. An investigation of the incidence among Danish school children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 5:27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Steeno O, Knops J, Declerck L, Adimoelja A, van de Voorde H (1976) Prevention of fertility disorders by detection and treatment of varicocele at school and college age. Andrologia 8:47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger OG (1980) Varicocele in adolescence. Clin Pediatr Phila 19:810–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Comhaire FH (1986) Varicocele and male infertility. In: Paulson JD, Negro-Vilar A, Lucena E, Martini L (eds) Andrology, male fertility and sterility. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 253–270

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mordel N, Mor Yosef S, Margalioth EJ, Simon A, Menashe M, Berger M, Schenker JG (1990) Spermatic vein ligation as treatment for male infertility. Justification by postoperative semen improvement and pregnancy rates. J Reprod Med 35:123–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivanissevich O (1960) Left varicocele due to reflux. Experience with 4,470 operative cases in forty-two years. J Int Colorectal Surg 34:742–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Palomo A (1949) Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique: preliminary report. J Urol 61:604–607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C (1992) Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol 148:1808–1811

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lima SS, Castro MP, Costa OF (1978) A new method for the treatment of varicocele. Andrologia 10:103–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pryor JL, Howards SS (1987) Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 14:499–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanchez-de-Badajoz E, Diaz-Ramirez F, Vara-Thorbeck C (1990) Endoscopic varicocelectomy. J Endourol 4:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hagood PG, Mehan DJ, Worischeck JH, Andrus CH, Parra RO (1992) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: preliminary report of a new technique. J Urol 147:73–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Donovan JF, Winfield HN (1992) Laparoscopic varix ligation. J Urol 147:77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuda T, Horii Y, Higashi S, Oishi K, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O (1992) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a simple technique for clip ligation of the spermatic vessels. J Urol 147:636–638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuda T, Yoshida O (1994) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy as a minimally invasive surgery: a review. Jpn J Endourol ESWL 7:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winfield HN, Donovan JF (1992) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Semin Urol 10:152–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstein M (1993) Surgical therapy of male infertility (editorial). J Urol 149:1374–1376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahlberg NE, Bartley O, Chidekel N, Fritjofsson A (1966) Phlebography in varicocele scroti. Acta Radiol Diagn Stockh 4:517–528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nadel SN, Hutchins GM, Albertsen PC, White RI Jr (1984) Valves of the internal spermatic vein: potential for misdiagnosis of varicocele by venography. Fertil Steril 41:479–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wishahi MM (1991) Detailed anatomy of the internal spermatic vein and the ovarian vein. Human cadaver study and operative spermatic venography: clinical aspects. J Urol 145:780–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Comhaire F, Kunnen M, Nahoum C (1981) Radiological anatomy of the internal spermatic vein(s) in 200 retrograde venograms. Int J Androl 4:379–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill JT, Green NA (1977) Varicocele: a review of radiological and anatomical features in relation to surgical treatment. Br J Surg 64:747–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wishahi MM (1992) Anatomy of the spermatic venous plexus (pampiniform plexus) in men with and without varicocele: intraoperative venographic study. J Urol 147:1285–1289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coolsaet BL (1980) The varicocele syndrome: venography determining the optimal level for surgical management. J Urol 124:833–839

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorenstein A, Katz S, Schiller M (1986) Varicocele in children: “to treat or not to treat”—venographic and manometric studies. J Pediatr Surg 21:1046–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sayfan J, Adam YG, Soffer Y (1980) A new entity in varicocele subfertility: the “cremasteric reflux.” Fertil Steril 33:88–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Setchell BP, Waites GMH (1969) Pulse attenuation and counter-current heat exchange in the internal spermatic artery of some Australian marsupials. J Reprod Fertil 20:165–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee LM, Johnson HW, McLoughlin MG (1984) Microdissection and radiographic studies of the arterial vasculature of the human testes. J Pediatr Surg 19:297–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Silber SJ (1979) Microsurgical aspects of varicocele. Fertil Steril 31:230–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beck EM, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M (1992) Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study. J Urol 148:1190–1194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mandressi A, Buizza C, Antonelli D, Chisena S (1996) Is laparoscopy a worthy method to treat varicocele? Comparison between 160 cases of two-port laparoscopic and 120 cases of open inguinal spermatic vein ligation. J Endourol 10:435–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Loughlin KR, Brooks DC (1992) The use of a Doppler probe to facilitate laparoscopic varicocele ligation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:326–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1994) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol 151:895–897

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gurpinar T, Sariyuce O, Balbay MD, Ozkan S, Gurel M (1995) Retroperitoneoscopic bilateral spermatic vein ligation. J Urol 153:127–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Matsuda T, Ogura K, Uchida J, Fujita I, Terachi T, Yoshida O (1995) Smaller ports result in shorter convalescence after laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol 153:1175–1177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lenk S, Fahlenkamp D, Gliech V, Lindeke A (1994) Comparison of different methods of treating varicocele. J Androl 15 (suppl):34s-37s

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aaberg RA, Vancaillie TG, Schuessler WW (1991) Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: a new technique. Fertil Steril 56:776–777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. al-Shareef ZH, Koneru SR, al Tayeb A, Shehata ZM, Aly TF, Basyouni A (1993) Laparoscopic ligation of varicoceles: an anatomically superior operation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75:345–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gill B, Kogan SJ, Maldonado J, Reda E, Levitt SB (1990) Significance of intraoperative venographic patterns on the postoperative recurrence and surgical incision placement of pediatric varicoceles. J Urol 144:502–505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kass EJ, Marcol B (1992) Results of varicocele surgery in adolescents: a comparison of techniques. J Urol 148:694–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Okuyama A, Fujisue H, Matsui T, Doi Y, Takeyama M, Nakamura N, Namiki M, Fuijoka H, Matsuda M (1988) Surgical repair of varicocele: effective treatment for subfertile men in a controlled study. Eur Urol 14:298–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Okuyama A, Nakamura M, Namiki M, Takeyama M, Utsunomiya M, Fujioka H, Itatani H, Matsuda M, Matsumoto K, Sonoda T (1988) Surgical repair of varicocele at puberty: preventive treatment for fertility improvement. J Urol 139:562–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Matsuda T, Horii Y, Yoshida O (1993) Should the testicular artery be preserved at varicocelectomy? J Urol 149:1357–1360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ross LS, Ruppman N (1993) Varicocele vein ligation in 565 patients under local anesthesia: a long-term review of technique, results and complications in light of proposed management by laparoscopy. J Urol 149:1361–1363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Seibold J, Janetschek G, Bartsch G (1996) Laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology. Eur Urol 30:394–399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dahlstrand C, Thune A, Hedelin H, Grenabo L, Pettersson S (1994) Laparoscopic ligature of the spermatic veins. A comparison between outpatient and hospitalised treatment. Scand J Urol Nephrol 28:159–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ulker V, Garibyan H, Kurth KH (1997) Comparison of inguinal and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of varicocele. Int Urol Nephrol 29:71–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fuse H, Okumura A, Sakamoto M, Ohta S, Katayama T (1996) Laparoscopic varicocele ligation. Int Urol Nephrol 28:91–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fahlenkamp D, Winfield HN, Schonberger B, Mueller W, Loening SA (1997) Role of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology. Eur Urol 32:75–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Iselin CE, Almagbaly U, Borst F, Rohner S, Schmidlin F, Campana A, Graber P (1997) Safety and efficiency of laparoscopic varicocelectomy in one hundred consecutive cases. Urol Int 58:213–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Dudai M, Sayfan J, Mesholam J, Sperber Y (1995) Laparoscopic simultaneous ligation of internal and external spermatic veins for varicocele. J Urol 153:704–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Enquist E, Stein BS, Sigman M (1994) Laparoscopic versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: a comparative study. Fertil Steril 61:1092–1096

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rajfer J, Pickett S, Klein SR (1992) Laparoscopic occlusion of testicular veins for clinical varicocele. Urology 40:113–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Jarow JP, Assimos DG, Pittaway DE (1993) Effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Urology 42:544–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ng WT, Wong MK, Book KS, Yeung HC, Liu K, Lau HW (1995) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in pediatric patients. Urology 46:121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Belloli G, Musi L, D’Agostino S (1996) Laparoscopic surgery for adolescent varicocele: preliminary report on 80 patients. J Pediatr Surg 31:1488–1490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Miersch WD, Schoeneich G, Winter P, Buszello H (1995) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: indication, technique and surgical results. Br J Urol 76:636–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Tan SM, Ng FC, Ravintharan T, Lim PH, Chng HC (1995) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: technique and results. Br J Urol 75:523–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Mischinger HJ, Colombo T, Rauchenwald M, Altziebler S, Steiner H, Vilits P, Hubmer G (1994) Laparoscopic procedure for varicocelectomy. Br J Urol 74:112–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Mehan DJ, Andrus CH, Parra RO (1992) Laparoscopic internal spermatic vein ligation: report of a new technique. Fertil Steril 58:1263–1266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ralph DJ, Timoney AG, Parker C, Pryor JP (1993) Laparoscopic varicocele ligation. Br J Urol 72:230–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lynch WJ, Badenoch DF, McAnena OJ (1993) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ligation of the testicular vein. Br J Urol 72:796–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Darzi A, Carey P, Menzies Gow N, Monson JR (1994) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:210–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wuernschimmel E, Lipsky H, Noest G (1995) Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: a recommendable standard procedure with good long-term results. Eur Urol 27:18–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Milad MF, Zein TA, Hussein EA, Ayyat FM, Schneider MP, Sant GR (1996) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy for infertility. An initial report from Saudi Arabia. Eur Urol 29:462–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Chiu AW, Huang WJ, Chen KK, Chang LS (1996) Laparoscopic ligation of bilateral spermatic varices under epidural anesthesia. Urol Int 57:80–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Spaziani E, Silecchia G, Ricci S, Raparelli L, Materia A, Fantini A, Basso N (1997) Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of idiopathic varicocele. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:140–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ugazzi M, Chiriboga A, Proano L (1996) Laparoscopic treatment for varicocele. J Laparoendosc Surg 6 (suppl 1):S9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Abdel Meguid TA, Hirsch IH (1997) Noninsufflative extraperitoneal laparoscopic varicocele ligation. Tech Urol 3:12–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Black J, Beck RO, Hickey NC, Windsor CW (1991) Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of varicocele. Lancet 338:383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Humphrey GM, Najmaldin AS (1997) Laparoscopy in the management of pediatric varicoceles. J Pediatr Surg 32:1470–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Donovan JF Jr (1994) Laparoscopic varix ligation (editorial). Urology 44:467–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Matsuda T, Uchida J, Muguruma K, Mikami O, Komatsu Y, Terachi T, Horii Y, Ogura K, Arai Y, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O (1993) Complications in urological laparoscopic surgery. Acta Urol Jpn 39:337–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wallijn E, Desmet R (1977) Hydrocele: a frequently overlooked complication after high ligation of the spermatic vein for varicocele. Int J Androl 1:411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Szabo R, Kessler R (1984) Hydrocele following internal spermatic vein ligation: a retrospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 132:924–925

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Club TSS (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Terachi T, Matsuda T, Terai A, Ogawa O, Kakehi Y, Kawakita M, Shichiri Y, Mikami O, Takeuchi H, Okada Y, Yoshida O (1997) Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: experience in 100 patients. J Endourol 11:361–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Parra RO, Perez MG, Boullier JA, Cummings JM (1995) Comparison between standard flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. J Urol 153:1171–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Elashry O (1995) Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer—the Washington University experience. J Urol 154:975–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ogura K, Matsuda T, Terachi T, Horii Y, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O (1994) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: invasiveness and effectiveness compared with conventional open retroperitoneal high ligation. Int J Urol 1:62–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Mastrogiacomo I, Foresta C, Ruzza G, Rizzotti A, Lembo A, Zanchetta R (1983) Pathogenesis of persistent infertility in men after varicocelectomy. Andrologia 15: 573–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Homonnai ZT, Fainman N, Engelhard Y, Rudberg Z, David MP, Paz G (1980) Varicocelectomy and male fertility: comparison of semen quality and recurrence of varicocele following varicocelectomy by two techniques. Int J Androl 3:447–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Yavetz H, Levy R, Papo J, Yogev L, Paz G, Jaffa AJ, Homonnai ZT (1992) Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality. Int J Androl 15:338–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Reitelman C, Burbige KA, Sawczuk IS, Hensle TW (1987) Diagnosis and surgical correction of the pediatric varicocele. J Urol 138:1038–1040

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Murray RR Jr, Mitchell SE, Kadir S, Kaufman SL, Chang R, Kinnison ML, Smyth JW, White RI Jr (1986) Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion. J Urol 135:286–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Rothman CM, Newmark HD, Karson RA (1981) The recurrent varicocele—a poorly recognized problem. Fertil Steril 35:552–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Kane MG, Krejs GJ (1984) Complications of diagnostic laparoscopy in Dallas: a 7-year prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 30:237–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Poindexter AN III, Abdul-Malak M, Fast JE (1990) Laparoscopic tubal sterilization under local anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 75:5–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Mintz M (1977) Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases. J Reprod Med 18:269–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Querleu D, Chapron C, Chevallier L, Bruhat MA (1993) Complications of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery—a French multicenter collaborative study. N Engl J Med 328:1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Jarow JP (1994) Varicocele repair: low ligation (editorial). Urology 44:470–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Marmar JL, DeBenedictis TJ, Praiss D (1985) The management of varicoceles by microdissection of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring. Fertil Steril 43:583–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 The Japanese Society of Endourology and ESWL

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matsuda, T. (1999). Laparoscopic Treatment for Varicocele Testis: Current Status. In: Yoshida, O., Higashihara, E., Ohshima, S., Matsuda, T. (eds) Urologic Laparoscopy. Recent Advances in Endourology, vol 1. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65898-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65898-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-65900-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-65898-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics