Skip to main content

On the Making of Endocasts: The New and the Old in Paleoneurology

Part of the Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series book series (RNMH)

Abstract

Making endocasts with latex rubber has been around for many years. This chapter describes my methods which were not original and some of the experiences encountered. Other methods, using plaster of Paris, various silicon-based rubbers, and Admold (dental caulk), for sectioned crania are examined and their relative merits and problems compared, such as damage to original specimens, deterioration with time (especially with latex rubber), and tensile strength of silicon-based molds. The resolution is as good as it can get, compared to “virtual” endocasts. These older methods have largely been succeeded by the making of “virtual” endocasts through various scanning procedures, with numerous advantages such as being noninvasive of original fossil specimens, immediate coordinates for morphometric analyses, scan data sharing and replication, and production of actual virtual endocasts through 3-D printing.

Keywords

  • Brain endocasts
  • Latex
  • Silicon
  • Dental caulk
  • “Virtual” endocasts

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.1
Fig. 1.2
Fig. 1.3
Fig. 1.4
Fig. 1.5
Fig. 1.6
Fig. 1.7

References

  • Berger LR, Hawks J, de Ruiter DJ, Churchill SE, Schmid P et al (2015) Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa. elife 4:e09560

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner E, Manzi G (2005) CT-based description and phyletic evaluation of the archaic human calvarium from Ceprano, Italy. Anat Rec 285A:643–658

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson KJ, Stout D, Jashashvili T, de Ruiter DJ, Tafforeau P et al (2011) The endocast of of MH1, Australopithecus sediba. Science 333:1402–1407

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Copes L (2012) Comparative and experimental investigations of cranial robusticity in Mid-Pleistocene Hominins. PhD dissertation, Arizona State University, 696 pages; 3505341

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinger T (1929) Die fossilen Gehirne. Ergebneise Anat Entwicklungen Gesch 28:1–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinger T (1949) Paleoneurology versus comparative brain anatomy. Confina Neurol Separatum 9:5–24

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edinger T (1975) Paleoneurology 1804–1966: an annotated bibliography. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Falk D, Hildebolt C, Smith K, Morwood MJ, Sutikna T et al (2005) The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis. Science 308:242–245

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Neubauer S, Weber GW, Bookstein FL (2009) Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. J Hum Evol 57:48–62

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway RL (1964) Quantitative relations in the primate brain. PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley, pp 174

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway RL (1966) Dendritic branching: some preliminary results of training and complexity in rat visual cortex. Brain Res 2:393–396

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway RL (1981) Exploring the dorsal surface of hominoid brain endocasts by stereoplotter and discriminant analysis. Phil Trans R Soc London B 292:155–166

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway RL (2008) The human brain evolving: a personal retrospective. Annu Rev Anthropol 37:1–19

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway RL (2014) Paleoneurology, resurgent! In: Bruner E (ed) Human paleoneurology. Springer Series in Bio/Neuroinformatics, Berlin, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway RL, Broadfield DC, Yuan MS (2004) Brain endocasts: the paleoneurological evidence. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer S, Gunz P, Weber GW, Hublin JJ (2012) Endocranial volume of Australopithecus africanus: new CT-based estimates and the effects of missing data and small sample size. J Hum Evol 62:498–510

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oyen OJ, Walker A (1977) Stereometric craniometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 46:177–182

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Radinsky L (1967) The oldest primate endocast. Am J Phys Anthropol 27:385–388

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenemann PT, Gee J, Avants B, Holloway RL, Monge J, Lewis J (2007) Validation of plaster endocast morphology through 3D CT image analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 132:188–192

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weber GW, Gunz P, Neubauer S, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL (2012) Digital South African fossils: morphological studies using reference-based reconstruction and electronic preparation. In: Reynolds SC, Gallagher A (eds) African genesis: perspectives on Hominin evolution. Cambridge, New York, pp 298–316

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León M (2013) Pandora’s growing box: inferring the evolution and development of hominin brains from endocasts. Evol Anthropol 22:20–33

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph L. Holloway .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holloway, R.L. (2018). On the Making of Endocasts: The New and the Old in Paleoneurology. In: Bruner, E., Ogihara, N., Tanabe, H. (eds) Digital Endocasts. Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56582-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56582-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-56580-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-56582-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)