Advertisement

Reversal of Mutualism

  • Atsushi KawakitaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

A major goal in the study of mutualism is to understand how co-operation is maintained when mutualism may potentially turn into parasitism. As detailed in Chap.  8, certain mutualisms feature host sanction or partner choice mechanisms that help stabilize cooperation by decreasing the fitness of noncooperative individuals. For example, in obligate pollination mutualisms, plants selectively abscise flowers that contain high numbers of pollinator eggs relative to the amount of pollen deposited, thereby punishing individuals that impose heavy egg loads or those that do not pollinate (Pellmyr and Huth 1994; Addicott and Bao 1999; Goto et al. 2010; Jandér and Herre 2010; Jandér et al. 2012).

Keywords

Active pollination behavior Braconidae Epicephala Gall Parasitoid Phyllanthus microcarpus Phyllanthus reticulatus Phylogeny Proboscis 

Literature Cited

  1. Addicott JF, Bao T (1999) Limiting the costs of mutualism: multiple modes of interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Als TD, Vila R, Kandul NP, Nash DR, Yen S-H, Hsu Y-F, Mignault AA, Boomsma JJ, Pierce NE (2004) The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature 432:386–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey R, Schönrogge K, Cook JM, Melika G, Csóka G, Thuróczy C, Stone GN (2009) Host niches and defensive extended phenotypes structure parasitoid wasp communities. PLoS Biol 7:e1000179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bidartondo MI, Bruns TD (2001) Extreme specificity in epiparasitic Monotropoideae (Ericaceae): widespread phylogenetic and geographical structure. Mol Ecol 10:2285–2295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Culley TM, Weller SG, Sakai AK (2002) The evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol 17:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Espíndola A, Carstens BC, Alvarez N (2014) Comparative phylogeography of mutualists and the effect of the host on the genetic structure of its partners. Biol J Linn Soc 113:1021–1035Google Scholar
  7. Goto R, Okamoto T, Kiers ET, Kawakita A, Kato M (2010) Selective flower abortion maintains moth cooperation in a newly discovered pollination mutualism. Ecol Lett 13:321–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heraty JM, Burks RA, Cruaud A, Gibson GAP, Liljeblad J, Munro J, Rasplus J-Y, Delvare G, Janšta P, Gumovsky A, Huber J, Woolley JB, Krogmann L, Heydon S, Polaszek A, Schmidt S, Darling DC, Gates MW, Mottern J, Murray E, Dal Molin A, Triapitsyn S, Baur H, Pinto JD, van Noort S, George J, Yoder M (2013) A phylogenetic analysis of the megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Cladistics 29:466–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hibbett DS, Gilbert LB, Donoghue MJ (2000) Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature 407:506–508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jandér KC, Herre EA (2010) Host sanctions and pollinator cheating in the fig tree–fig wasp mutualism. Proc R Soc B 277:1481–1488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jandér KC, Herre EA, Simms EL (2012) Precision of host sanctions in the fig tree–fig wasp mutualism: consequences for uncooperative symbionts. Ecol Lett 15:1362–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li H, Yang X (2015) Three new species of Epicephala Meyrick (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) associated with Phyllanthus microcarpus (Benth.) (Phyllanthaceae). ZooKeys 484:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luo SX, Esser HJ, Zhang D, Renner SS (2011a) Nuclear ITS sequences help disentangle Phyllanthus reticulatus (Phyllanthaceae), an Asian species not occurring in Africa, but introduced to Jamaica. Syst Bot 36:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lutzoni F, Pagel M, Reeb V (2001) Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411:937–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Machado CA, Jousselin E, Kjellberg F, Compton SG, Herre EA (2001) Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. Proc R Soc B 268:685–694CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Pellissier L, Litsios G, Fiedler K, Pottier J, Dubuis A, Pradervand JN, Salamin N, Guisan A (2012) Loss of interactions with ants under cold climate in a regional myrmecophilous butterfly fauna. J Biogeogr 39:1782–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pellmyr O (1997) Pollinating seed eaters: why is active pollination so rare? Ecology 78:1655–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pellmyr O, Huth CJ (1994) Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pellmyr O, Thompson JN, Brown JM, Harrison RG (1996a) Evolution of pollination and mutualism in the yucca moth lineage. Am Nat 148:827–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng YQ, Duan ZB, Yang DR, Rasplus JY (2008) Co-occurrence of two Eupristina species on Ficus altissima in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Symbiosis 45:9–14Google Scholar
  21. Sachs JL, Simms EL (2006) Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends Ecol Evol 21:585–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sachs JL, Mueller UG, Wilcox TP, Bull JJ (2004) The evolution of cooperation. Q Rev Biol 79:135–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone GN, Schonrogge K (2003) The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:512–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ecological ResearchKyoto UniversityOtsuJapan

Personalised recommendations