Advertisement

Biogeographic Pattern of Japanese Birds: A Cluster Analysis of Faunal Similarity and a Review of Phylogenetic Evidence

  • Takeshi YamasakiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Diversity and Commonality in Animals book series (DCA)

Abstract

The Japanese islands accommodate 102 native breeding species/subspecies of water birds (comprising 99 species belonging to 58 genera and 22 families) and 246 native breeding species/subspecies of land birds (comprising 156 species belonging to 101 genera and 40 families). The degree of endemism at the species/subspecies level is low in the former (11.8 %) and high in the latter (47.2 %). In this chapter, I investigated the geographic patterns of the community composition of land birds in detail. Using hierarchical and nonhierarchical methods, the cluster analysis of faunal similarity revealed that, despite high vagility, land birds on continental islands exhibited the same biogeographic patterns as other terrestrial vertebrates. This result suggests that the land birds and non-volant terrestrial vertebrates have evolved under the strong influence of the island geohistory, including the appearance and disappearance of land bridges. The cluster analysis also revealed that, in contrast to the non-volant terrestrial vertebrates, the Japanese land birds formed comparatively rich and distinct faunas on these oceanic islands.

Keywords

Japanese birds Species diversity Endemism Biogeography Continental islands Oceanic islands Cluster analysis Faunal similarity 

References

  1. Abe H, Ishii N, Itoo T, Kaneko Y, Maeda K, Miura S, Yoneda M (2005) A guide to the mammals of Japan, 2nd edn. Tokai University Press, HadanoGoogle Scholar
  2. BirdLife International (2015) Species factsheet: Gorsachius goisagi. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 09/11/2015
  3. Choi C-Y, Nam H-Y (2008) Distribution of the Japanese Wagtail Motacilla grandis in Korea. Ornithol Sci 7(1):85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cracraft J (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. In: Johnston R (ed) Current ornithology, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 159–187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6781-3_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dekker R, Dickinson E, Morioka H (2001) Systematic notes on Asian birds. 18. Some nomenclatural issues relating to Japanese taxa described in the Planches Coloriées (1820–1839) and Fauna Japonica, Aves (1844–1850). Zool Verh 335:199–214Google Scholar
  6. del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Cabot J (eds) (2010) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 15. Lynx Edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong L, Wei M, Alström P, Huang X, Olsson U, Shigeta Y, Zhang Y, Zheng G (2015) Taxonomy of the Narcissus Flycatcher Ficedula narcissina complex: an integrative approach using morphological, bioacoustic and multilocus DNA data. Ibis 157(2):312–325. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5(2):164–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00562.x Google Scholar
  9. Gooders J (1982) Collins British birds. William Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hachisuka M (1925) A comparative hand list of the birds of Japan and the British isles. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Holt BG, Lessard J-P, Borregaard MK, Fritz SA, Araújo MB, Dimitrov D, Fabre P-H, Graham CH, Graves GR, Jønsson KA, Nogués-Bravo D, Wang Z, Whittaker RJ, Fjeldså J, Rahbek C (2013) An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339(6115):74–78. doi: 10.1126/science.1228282 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerr KCR, Birks SM, Kalyakin MV, Red’kin YA, Koblik EA, Hebert PDN (2009) Filling the gap: COI barcode resolution in eastern Palearctic birds. Front Zool 6:29–29. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-29 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuroda N (1932) A revision of the types of birds described by Japanese authors during the years 1923 to 1931. Novit Zool 37:384–405Google Scholar
  14. McKay BD, Mays HL, C-T Y, Wan D, Higuchi H, Nishiumi I (2014) Incorporating color into integrative taxonomy: analysis of the varied tit (Sittiparus varius) complex in East Asia. Syst Biol. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu016 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mearns B, Mearns R (1988) Biographies for bird watchers: the lives of those commemorated in Western Palearctic bird names. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Merriam-Webster (1997) Merriam-Webster’s geographical dictionary. Merriam-Webster, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  17. Millien-Parra V, Jaeger J-J (1999) Island biogeography of the Japanese terrestrial mammal assemblages: an example of a relict fauna. J Biogeogr 26(5):959–972. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00346.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morioka H (1971) Alpine Avifauna of Hokkaido, Japan. Mem Natl Sci Mus 4:43–54Google Scholar
  19. Morioka H (1974) Avifauna of the Ryukyu Islands and its origin. Mem Natl Sci Mus 7:203–211Google Scholar
  20. Morioka H (1979) Taxonomic and distributional notes on Japanese birds: 1. Notes on Turdus chrysolaus orii. Tori 28(4):125–129. doi: 10.3838/jjo1915.28.125 Google Scholar
  21. Morioka H (1990) Breeding birds of the Tokara Islands and their origin. Mem Natl Sci Mus 23:151–166Google Scholar
  22. Morioka H (1994) Subspecific status of certain birds breeding in Hokkaido. Mem Natl Sci Mus 27:165–173Google Scholar
  23. Morioka H, Sakane T (1980) Subalpine avifauna of the Ohmine mountain range in the Kii Peninsula, Japan. Mem Natl Sci Mus 13:53–58Google Scholar
  24. Morioka H, Dickinson EC, Hiraoka T, Allen D, Yamasaki T (2005) Types of Japanese birds. Natl Sci Mus Monogr 28:1–154Google Scholar
  25. Nakamura T, Nakamua M (1995) Bird’s life in Japan with color pictures: birds of mountain, woodland and field. Hoikusha, OsakaGoogle Scholar
  26. Nishiumi I, Morioka H (2009) A new subspecies of Zoothera dauma (Aves, Turdidae) from Iriomotejima, southern Ryukyus, with comments on Z. d. toratugumi. Bull Natl Mus Nat Sci Ser A Zool 35(2):113–124Google Scholar
  27. Ota H (1998) Geographic patterns of endemism and speciation in amphibians and reptiles of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan, with special reference to their paleogeographical implications. Res Popul Ecol 40(2):189–204. doi: 10.1007/BF02763404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ota H (2000) The current geographic faunal pattern of reptiles and amphibians of the Ryukyu Archipelago and adjacent regions. Tropics 10(1):51–62. doi: 10.3759/tropics.10.51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parkin D, Knox A (2010) The status of birds in Britain and Ireland. Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Saitoh T, Alström P, Nishiumi I, Shigeta Y, Williams D, Olsson U, Ueda K (2010) Old divergences in a boreal bird supports long-term survival through the Ice Ages. BMC Evol Biol 10:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-35 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saitoh T, Sugita N, Someya S, Iwami Y, Kobayashi S, Kamigaichi H, Higuchi A, Asai S, Yamamoto Y, Nishiumi I (2015) DNA barcoding reveals 24 distinct lineages as cryptic bird species candidates in and around the Japanese Archipelago. Mol Ecol Resour 15(1):177–186. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12282 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seki S, Tokorozaki S, Mizoguchi F, Takagi S, Nakamura N, Crystal F (2011) Avifauna of the Tokara Islands, northern Ryukyu Archipelago. Bull For For Prod Res Inst 10(4):183–229Google Scholar
  33. Sengoku S, Hikida T, Matsui M, Nakaya K (eds) (1996) The encyclopedia of the animals in Japan, vol. 5. Amphibians, reptiles, Chondrichthyes. Heibonsha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  34. Short LL (1973) Notes on Okinawan birds and Ryukyu Island zoogeography. Ibis 115(2):264–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1973.tb02642.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2015) Japan statistical yearbook 2015. http://www.stat.go.jp/data/nenkan/index1.htm. Accessed 10 June 2015
  36. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30(12):2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. The American Ornithologists’ Union (1919) Notes and news. Auk 36(4):628–636. doi: 10.2307/4073424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. The Ornithological Society of Japan (1974) Check-list of Japanese birds, 5th edn. Gakken, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  39. The Ornithological Society of Japan (2000) Check-list of Japanese birds, 6th edn. The Ornithological Society of Japan, ObihiroGoogle Scholar
  40. The Ornithological Society of Japan (2012) Check-list of Japanese birds, 7th edn. The Ornithological Society of Japan, SandaGoogle Scholar
  41. The World Bank (2015) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC. Accessed 8 July 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vaurie C (1959) The birds of the Palearctic Fauna: order Passeriformes. Witherby, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaurie C (1965) The birds of the Palearctic Fauna: non-Passeriformes. Witherby, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Yamasaki T (2006) Taxonomic status of populations of the light-vented bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes: Pycnonotidae) in Taiwan and the southern Ryukyus. Zool Stud 45(2):168–179Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yamashina Institute for OrnithologyAbiko, ChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations