Advertisement

Indonesian Fuel Subsidy Removal Impact on Environment: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis

  • Ahmad LuthfiEmail author
  • Shinji Kaneko
Chapter

Abstract

Due to its accelerating economy and growing population, Indonesia consumed more and more energy. It has become an oil-importing country since 2003. Furthermore, Indonesia’s energy policy has changed drastically since the Asian crisis by giving more funds to fuel subsidy than development fund. These facts made scholars and international institutions urge the government of Indonesia to remove the subsidy. One of the benefits of removal of subsidy is lessening CO2 emission due to lower fuel consumption. There are several studies conducted to estimate the impact of subsidy removal using descriptive analysis, computable general equilibrium and partial equilibrium analysis. This paper tries to estimate the CO2 emission reduction using partial equilibrium analysis based on several price adjustment scenarios. The policy implication of this paper would be that the government should keep the ongoing removal of fuel subsidy because this action would be more environmental friendly by saving around 70 million tonnes CO2 which is double compared to IEA estimation using 1998 data (IEA 2000).

Keyword

Fuel subsidy Subsidy removal effect Partial equilibrium analysis 

References

  1. Abeysinghe T (2001) Estimation of direct and indirect impact of oil price on growth. Econ Lett 73:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bank Indonesia (2013) Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara. Economic and Financial StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  3. British Colombia Ministry of Environment (2013) Methodology for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions. Ministry of Environment, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  4. BP – British Petroleum (2013) Statistical review of world energy 2013. BP Statistics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Burniaux J, Chateau J, Dellink R, et al (2009) The economics of climate change mitigation: how to build the necessary global action in a cost-effective manner. OECD Econ Dep work pap 128Google Scholar
  6. Hartono D, Resosudarmo BP (2008) The economy-wide impact of controlling energy consumption in Indonesia: an analysis using a social accounting matrix framework. Energy Policy 36:1404–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill H (2007) The Indonesian economy: growth, crisis and recovery. Singap Econ Rev 52:137–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hope E, Singh B (1995) Energy price increases in developing countries. The Policy Research PaperGoogle Scholar
  9. IEA (2000) World energy outlook 1999: looking at energy subsidies: getting the prices right. International Energy Agency, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2012) Handbook of energy and economics statistics of Indonesia. Pusdatin, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  11. Indonesia’s Ministry of Finance (2004) Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara, Fiscal Policy Office, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  12. International Monetary Fund (2013a) World economic outlook database. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. International Monetary Fund (2013b) International financial statistics. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehrara M, Oskoui KN (2007) The sources of macroeconomic fluctuations in oil exporting countries: a comparative study. Econ Model 24:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosser A (2007) Escaping the resource curse: the case of Indonesia. J Contemp Asia 37:38–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School for International Development and CooperationHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations