Advertisement

Less Emissions and Less Waste: An Economic Analysis of a Waste-to-Energy Project for Bekasi City

  • Savin Ven JohnsonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Waste-to-energy (WTE) can be a potential solution for Indonesia allowing for improved waste management, reduced emissions, and less waste in landfills. An economic analysis comparing WTE and landfilling using Bekasi City, Indonesia, as a case study is examined. Waste amounts are projected for 2015–2035 with baseline costs and emissions estimated. Next, parameters for the WTE scenario are presented followed by economic analysis with IRRs calculated. Sensitivity analyses are also conducted to assess changes on the returns, given different relative price changes in future. The WTE scenario considers three incineration plant sizes and two major revenue sources – per ton of cleaning benefit and electricity sales – not currently implemented under two different scopes: independent introduction of WTE and its reference to current landfilling strategy. The results show that there are possible conditions that make WTE financially feasible especially larger scale of projects with large collection volumes. The IRRs would then be largely improved by further aggressive feed-in tariff policy. Waste management should not be viewed solely as private sector service but a public good with social costs and benefits taken into account, since environmental benefits also improve the IRRs. National-level initiatives such as the National Waste Policy and the feed-in tariff provide a push and pull strategy for innovation in WTE, but additional policies for enhancing environmental awareness of the citizens can help hasten WTE adoption.

Keywords

Waste-to-energy (WTE) Landfilling Incinerator Bekasi City Feed-in tariff Cost and benefit analysis Sensitivity analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Asahi Glass Foundation and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25-699.

References

  1. Aprilia A, Tezuka T, Spaargaren G (2010) Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in Indonesia: a policy review. Available via ACADEMIA. http://www.academia.edu/411599/Municipal_solid_waste_management_and_Waste-to-energy_in_Indonesia_a_Policy_Review. Accessed 26 Oct 2012
  2. AusAID (2011) Scoping study for solid waste management in indonesia: technical report. Available via Indonesia Infrastructure Initiative. http://www.indii.co.id/publications-detail.php?id_news=258. Accessed 10 Oct 2012
  3. Chaerul M, Tanaka M, Shekdar A (2007) Municipal solid waste management in Indonesia: status and the strategic actions. J Fac Environ Sci Technol 12(1):41–49Google Scholar
  4. Cental Intelligence Agency “CIA” World Fact Book (2012) US Central Intelligence Agency https://www.cia.gov. Accessed 10 Oct 2012
  5. Damanhuri E (2005) Some principal issues on municipal solid waste management in Indonesia. In: Proceeding of the expert meeting on waste management in Asia-Pacific Islands, Tokyo, 27–29 Oct 2005Google Scholar
  6. Dijkgraaf E, and Vollebergh H (2003) Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods. Ecol Econ 50(3):233–247Google Scholar
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), United States (2015) Technical support document: – technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis – under executive order 12866 ­. http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/EPAactivities/economics/scc.html Accessed 24 Sept 2015
  8. Federal Reserve (n.d.) Annual average exchange rate JPY and USD. Available via http://japan.usembassy.gov/e/acs/tacs-7126b.html. Accessed 24 Mar 2013
  9. Global Carbon Project (2013) Methane budget 2013. Available via www.globalcarbonproject.org/global/pdf/pep/Kirschke2013_3DecadesMethane.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013
  10. Government of Bekasi City (2012) Kota Bekasi Dalam Angka/data primer Kota Bekasi 2011, Bekaski, Indonesia. Available via http://bekasikota.go.id/. Accessed 10 Dec 2012
  11. Government of Indonesia (2008) Act of the Republic of Indonesia number 18 year 2008 regarding waste management, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  12. Government of Indonesia (2010) Indonesia’s second national communication to the UNFCCC, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  13. Government of Indonesia (2011) In: Murniningtyas B, Endah (Deputy for Natural Resources and Environment) (eds) Guideline for implementing Green House Gas Emission Reduction Action Plan. Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency, Jakarta, p 165, Available via http://www.transport2012.org/bridging/ressources/documents/2/1717,Guideline-on-the-implementation-of-.pdf Accessed 14 Nov 2012Google Scholar
  14. Government of Indonesia (2013) Ministerial Decree 19/2013, from the Ministry of Mineral and Energy Resources proclamation no. 19 in year 2013 on the price of electricity purchased by State Electric Company PT Persero from Waste-Based Power Plant. Available via http://www.djlpe.esdm.go.id/modules/_website/files/37/File/Permen%20ESDM%2019%202013.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
  15. Hitachi-Zosen (2012) Study on the integrated waste to energy project in Greater Malang, The Republic of Indonesia. Malang. Available via http://www.meti.go.jp/meti_lib/report/2012fy/E001982-2.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  16. Indonesia SNC [Second National Communication] (2011) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Available via http://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/application/pdf/indonesia_snc.pdf
  17. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC/IGES, Hayama, Japan. Available via http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ppd.htm. Accessed 3 Mar 2013
  18. Jamasb T, Nepal R (2010) Issues and options in waste management: a social cost–benefit analysis of waste-to-energy in the UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1341–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaplan P, Decarolis J, Thorneloe S (2009) Is it better to burn or bury waste for clean electricity generation? Environ Sci Technol 43(6):1711–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khajuria A, Yamamoto Y, Morioka T (2010) Estimation of municipal solid waste generation and landfill area in Asian developing countries. J Environ Biol 31(5):649–654Google Scholar
  21. Meidiana C, Gamse T (2010) Development of waste management practices in Indonesia. Eur J Sci Res 40(2):199–210Google Scholar
  22. Rahim I, Nakayama H, Shimaoka T (2012) Cost analysis of municipal solid waste management in major Indonesian cities. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser G (Environ Res) 68(6):79–89Google Scholar
  23. Thomson and Reuters (n.d.) Carbon market. Available via http//:www.pointcarbon.com. Accessible at 8 Jun 2023
  24. Tsilemou K, Panagiotakopoulos D (2006) Approximate cost functions for solid waste treatment facilities. Waste Manag Res 24:310–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – UNFCCC (2006) Clean development mechanism project design document: Gikoko Bekasi – LFG Flaring Project (Version 10)Google Scholar
  26. World Bank (1999) What a waste: solid waste management in Asia. Urban Development Sector Unit East Asia and Pacific Region, May. Available via http://www.worldbank.org/urban/solid_wm/erm/CWG%20folder/uwp1.pdf
  27. World Bank (2000) Municipal solid. Waste incineration. A decision maker’s guide. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. World Bank (2008) Indonesia: Bekasi landfill gas recovery project. Project appraisal document (report no:40646-ID)Google Scholar
  29. World Bank (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series knowledge paper no. 15. Mar. Available via http://go.worldbank.org/BCQEP0TMO0. Accessed 6 Dec 2012
  30. World Bank (2013) Indonesia country data. Available via data.worldbank.org
  31. World Population Review (2013) Indonesia population. Available via http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/indonesia-population. Accessed 2 Feb 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityFederal Emergency Management AgencyWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations