Advertisement

Trait-Based Approaches for Understanding Species Niche, Coexistence, and Functional Diversity in Subalpine Moorlands

  • Kouki Hikosaka
  • Takehiro Sasaki
  • Chiho Kamiyama
  • Masatoshi Katabuchi
  • Shimpei Oikawa
  • Masaya Shimazaki
  • Hiroshi Kimura
  • Tohru Nakashizuka
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

Moorland is an interesting vegetation because (1) it has high diversity with various coexisting species of different functional groups; (2) the coexistence of species is conserved for long time without large disturbances; (3) it is isolated from other moorlands by forest areas, where dispersal of species is expected to be influenced by spatial distribution and size of moorlands; and (4) the environmental factors vary among moorlands, which enable us to determine how these environmental factors affect species composition. We analyzed species diversity of plant communities in subalpine moorlands as well as underlying mechanisms using trait-based approaches to reveal that landscape-level species diversity is mainly a function of between-moorland level species diversity. Species composition and community-level functional traits were influenced by environmental factors such as temperature and soil water characteristics. We analyzed light acquisition efficiency of species belonging to different functional groups and found a seasonal niche separation for light use between functional groups, facilitating species coexistence. Furthermore, we found that species diversity in moorland plant communities conforms to a spatially nested structure. By assuming that the nested rank of species is the potential order of species loss, our simulation analysis demonstrated that vulnerability is considerably different among moorlands, which implies that functional diversity can be a useful measure for the planning of conservation strategies.

Keywords

Functional groups Functional traits Leaf traits Moorland Resource acquisition efficiency Species coexistence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Koji Yonekura for advice on species identification, our laboratory colleagues for helping with field work, and land owner (Tashiro Farm) and government for permission of the study. This work was funded by the Global Environmental Research Fund of Japan’s Ministry of the Environment (F-052, F-092 and D-0904), the Mitsui & Co., Ltd. Environment Fund, Tohoku University’s Global COE program “Ecosystem Adaptability Science for the Future” (J03), JSPS research fellowship, and KAKENHI.

References

  1. Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164:S165–S184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerly DD, Cornwell WK (2007) A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. Ecol Lett 10:135–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anten NPR, Hirose T (1998) Biomass allocation and light partitioning among dominant and subordinate individuals in Xanthium canadense stands. Ann Bot 82:665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aselmann I, Crutzen PJ (1989) Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J Atmos Chem 8:307–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atmar W, Patterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azeria ET, Kolasa J (2008) Nestedness, niche metrics and temporal dynamics of a metacommunity in a dynamic natural model system. Oikos 117:1006–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady N, Weil R (1998) The nature and properties of soils, 12th edn. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48:1079–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin F, Zavaleta ES, Eviner V et al (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins SL, Glenn SM, Briggs JM (2002) Effects of local and regional processes on plant species richness in tallgrass prairie. Oikos 99:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD (2009) Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol Monogr 79:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawley MJ, Harral JE (2001) Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science 291:864–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Freckleton RP (2004) The problems of prediction and scale in applied ecology: the example of fire as a management tool. J Appl Ecol 41:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galeuchet DJ, Perret C, Fischer M (2005) Performance of Lychnis flos-cuculi from fragmented populations under experimental biotic interactions. Ecology 86:1002–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climate warming. Ecol Appl 1:182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1990) Comparative plant ecology. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajkova P, Hajek M, Apostolova I (2006) Diversity of wetland vegetation in the Bulgarian high mountains, main gradients and context-dependence of the pH role. Plant Ecol 184:111–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hikosaka K (2004) Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship: patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance. J Plant Res 117:481–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hikosaka K, Shigeno A (2009) The role of Rubisco and cell walls for the interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacity. Oecologia 160:443–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hikosaka K, Sudoh S, Hirose T (1999) Light acquisition and use by individuals competing in a dense stand of an annual herb, Xanthium canadense. Oecologia 118:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hikosaka K, Yamano T, Nagashima H, Hirose T (2003) Light- acquisition and use of individuals as influenced by elevated CO2 in even-aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album. Funct Ecol 17:786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillebrand H, Bennett DM, Cadotte MW (2008) Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89:1510–1520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1995) Canopy structure and photon flux partitioning among species in a herbaceous plant community. Ecology 76:466–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) In: Stocker TF et al (eds) Climate change 2013 the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonsson BG (2001) A null model for randomization tests of nestedness in species assemblages. Oecologia 127:309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamiyama C, Oikawa S, Kubo T, Hikosaka K (2010) Light interception in species with different functional types coexisting in moorland plant communities. Oecologia 164:591–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kamiyama C, Katabuchi M, Sasaki T, Shimazaki M, Nakashizuka T, Hikosaka K (2014a) Leaf-trait responses to environmental gradients in moorland communities: plasticity, species replacement and functional group replacement. Ecol Res 29:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kamiyama C, Oikawa S, Hikosaka K (2014b) Seasonal change in light partitioning among coexisting species of different functional groups along elevation gradient in subalpine moorlands. New Phytol 204:913–923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Karlsson PS (1985) Photosynthetic characteristics and leaf carbon economy of a deciduous and an evergreen dwarf shrub: Vaccinium uliginosum L. and V. vitis-idaea L. Holarct Ecol 8:9–17Google Scholar
  35. Kattage J, Díaz S, Lavorel S et al (2011) TRY—a global database of plant traits. Glob Chang Biol 17:2905–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koike K, Toshikazu T, Chinzei K, Miyagi T (2005) Regional geomorphology of the Japanese Islands, vol 3, Geomorphology of Tohoku Region. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  37. Körner C (2007) The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22:569–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lienert J, Fischer M, Diemer M (2002) Local extinctions of the wetland specialist Swertia perennis L. (Gentianaceae) in Switzerland: a revisitation study based on herbarium records. Biol Conserv 103:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacArthur R, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Matsumoto Y, Oikawa S, Yasumura Y, Hirose T, Hikosaka K (2008) Reproductive yield of individuals competing for light in a dense stand of an annual, Xanthium canadense. Oecologia 157:185–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Matsuzaki SS, Sasaki T, Akasaka M (2013) Consequences of the introduction of exotic and translocated species and future extirpations on the functional diversity of freshwater fish assemblages. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:1071–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews E, Fung I (1987) Methane emissions from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochem Cycles 1:61–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McIntyre S, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Cramer W (1999) Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics. Introduction. J Veg Sci 10:604–608Google Scholar
  44. Milla R, Reich PB (2011) Multi-trait interactions, not phylogeny, fine-tune leaf size reduction with increasing altitude. Ann Bot 107:455–465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Mochida Y, Sato M, Kikuchi T (1997) The vegetation of the south Hakkoda mountains, northern Honshu, Japan. Ecol Rev 23:295–300Google Scholar
  47. Muraoka H, Takakura S (1988) Explanatory text of the geological map of the Hakkoda geothermal area. Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  48. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Powell GVN, Wikramanayake ED (2002) Conservation biology for biodiversity crisis. Conserv Biol 16:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearcy RW, Muraoka H, Valladares F (2005) Crown architecture in sun and shade environments: assessing function and trade-offs with a three-dimensional simulation model. New Phytol 166:791–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002a) Extinction and the loss of functional diversity. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269:1721–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002b) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Poorter L, Kwant R, Hernandez R, Medina E, Werger MJA (2000) Leaf optimal properties in Venezuelan cold forest trees. Tree Physiol 20:519–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Proctor M, Maltby E (1998) Relations between acid atmospheric deposition and the surface pH of some ombrotrophic bogs in Britain. J Ecol 86:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raunkiær C (1904) Om biologiske Typer, med Hensyn til Planternes Tilpasninger til at overleve ugunstige Aarstider. Bot Tidskr 34:1–13Google Scholar
  56. Raunkiær C (1937) Plant life forms. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1991) Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 Amazonian tree species. Oecologia 86:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:365–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:13730–13734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Sasaki T, Katabuchi M, Kamiyama C, Shimazaki M, Nakashizuka T, Hikosaka K (2012a) Diversity partitioning of moorland plant communities across hierarchical spatial scales. Biodivers Conserv 21:1577–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sasaki T, Katabuchi M, Kamiyama C, Shimazaki M, Nakashizuka T, Hikosaka K (2012b) Nestedness and niche-based species loss in moorland plant communities. Oikos 121:1783–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sasaki T, Katabuchi M, Kamiyama C, Shimazaki M, Nakashizuka T, Hikosaka K (2013) Variations in species composition of moorland plant communities along environmental gradients within a subalpine zone in northern Japan. Wetlands 33:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sasaki T, Katabuchi M, Kamiyama C, Shimazaki M, Nakashizuka T, Hikosaka K (2014) Vulnerability of moorland plant communities to environmental change: consequences of realistic species loss on functional diversity. J Appl Ecol 51:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schimper AFW (1903) Plant-geography upon a physiological basis. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tsuyuzaki S, Haraguchi A, Kanda F (2004) Effects of scale-dependent factors on herbaceous vegetation patterns in a wetland, northern Japan. Ecol Res 19:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ulrich W, Gotelli NJ (2007) Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. Ecology 88:1824–1831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Ulrich W, Almeida-Neto M, Gotelli NJ (2009) A consumer’s guide to nestedness analysis. Oikos 118:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Valladares F, Skillman JB, Pearcy RW (2002) Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understory plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. Am J Bot 89:1275–1284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wahren CH, Williams RJ, Papst WA (1999) Alpine and subalpine wetland vegetation on the Bogong High Plains, southeastern Australia. Aust J Bot 47:165–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Werger MJA, Hirose T, During HJ et al (2002) Light partitioning among species and species replacement in early successional grasslands. J Veg Sci 13:615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Wheeler BD, Proctor MCF (2000) Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. J Ecol 88:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wright DH, Reeves JH (1992) On the meaning and measurement of nestedness of species assemblages. Oecologia 92:416–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wright DH, Patterson BD, Mikkelson GM, Cutler A, Atmar W (1998) A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Yonebayashi C (1996) Reconstruction of the vegetation at AD 915 at Ohse-yachi Mire, northern Japan, from pollen, present-day vegetation and tephra data. Plant Ecol 125:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yonebayashi C (2001) Reconstruction of local vegetation in AD 915 at an oligotrophic mire in northern Japan from pollen, present-day vegetation and tephra data. Ecol Res 16:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kouki Hikosaka
    • 1
    • 2
  • Takehiro Sasaki
    • 3
    • 4
  • Chiho Kamiyama
    • 5
  • Masatoshi Katabuchi
    • 6
  • Shimpei Oikawa
    • 7
  • Masaya Shimazaki
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Kimura
    • 8
  • Tohru Nakashizuka
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Life SciencesTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.CREST, Japan Science and Technology AgencyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Frontier SciencesThe University of TokyoKashiwa, ChibaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceChiba UniversityChibaJapan
  5. 5.Institute for the Advanced Study of SustainabilityUnited Nations UniversityTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Department of BiologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  7. 7.College of ScienceIbaraki UniversityMitoJapan
  8. 8.Tohoku Ryokka Kankyohozen Co., LtdSendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations