Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSDBJRS))

  • 424 Accesses

Abstract

In Book III of The General Theory, Keynes decomposes the aggregate demand function, which is introduced in Book I into the consumption and investment function. Book III considers properties of the consumption function, and provides the investment multiplier analysis that asserts that capital investment causes additional effective demand. Although Keynes recommends expansionary fiscal policy based on the multiplier analysis, the government of Britain did not response. While many researchers of Keynesian economics are inclined to blame the government’s unwise and/or obstinate attitude, one should note that economic conditions that Britain faced. Because of World War I, the country was heavily in debt to the US, although not to the same extent as continental Europe. In order to stabilize the value of monetary assets, an expansionary fiscal policy, which was associated with a considerable amount of public debt, might not have been considered reasonable by the government. Further, I show that Kahn’s employment multiplier reaches the same value as Keynes’s investment multiplier under some plausible condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One should note that it is necessary for the left-hand side to retain the economic meaning that the relative vector \(\overrightarrow {p}\) should be invariant with a change in an exogenous shock and the aggregation among production is feasible as shown in Appendix 1. The derivative \(\frac{{dY_{w} }}{dN}\) corresponds to that of (A.6) divided by the nominal wage, \(w\).

  2. 2.

    In relation to Book I, the following remarks are worth noting: ‘When involuntary unemployment exists, the marginal disutility of labor is necessarily less than the utility of the marginal product.’ (p. 128).

References

  • Kahn, R. F. (1931). The relation of home investment and to unemployment. Economic Journal, 41, 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (2012). Activities 1931–1939: World crises and policies in Britain and America, the collected writings of John Maynard Keynes (Vol. 21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otaki, M. (2015a). Keynesian economics and price theory: Re-orientation of a theory of monetary economy. Tokyo: Springer Japan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Otaki, M. (2015b). The origin of the prolonged economic stagnation in contemporary Japan: The factitious deflation and meltdown of the Japanese firm as an entity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayuki Otaki .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Development Bank of Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otaki, M. (2016). Analyzing Book III of The General Theory . In: Keynes’s General Theory Reconsidered in the Context of the Japanese Economy. SpringerBriefs in Economics(). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55915-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics