In this chapter, we provide an overview of the fundamental concepts and technical details for group-sequential designs for clinical trials comparing two interventions based on two primary endpoints. In this situation, there are many procedures for controlling the Type I error rate. We discuss the simplest procedure, i.e., the weighted Bonferroni procedure which is commonly applied in practice. We evaluate the behavior of the sample size, power, and Type I error rate associated with the procedure.
Average sample size Efficacy stopping Lan–DeMets error-spending method Maximum sample size Recycled significance level Union–intersection test Weighted Bonferroni procedure
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Bretz F, Maurer W, Brannath W, Posch M (2009) A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Stat Med 28:586–604MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall P (2011) Multiple comparisons using R. Chapman and Hall, CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Burman CF, Sonesson C, Guilbaud O (2009) A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests. Stat Med 28:739–761MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrienko A, Tamhane AC, Bretz F (2010) Multiple testing problems in pharmaceutical statistics. Chapman and Hall, CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
Glimm E, Mauer W, Bretz F (2009) Hierarchical testing of multiple endpoints in group-sequential trials. Stat Med 29:219–228MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Glimm E, Mauer W, Bretz F (2010) Hierarchical testing of multiple endpoints in group-sequential trials. Stat Med 29:219–228MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Hung HMJ, Wang SJ, O’Neill RT (2007) Statistical considerations for testing multiple endpoints in group sequential or adaptive clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 17:1201–1210MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamhane AC, Wu Y, Mehta C (2012) Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints. Stat Med 31:2027–2040MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang DI, Geller NL (1999) Closed testing procedures for group sequential clinical trials with multiple endpoints. Biometrics 55:1188–1192CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Tang DI, Gnecco C, Geller NL (1989) Design of group sequential clinical trials with multiple endpoints. J Am Stat Assoc 84:776–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens BL, Dmitrienko A (2010) On selecting a multiple comparison procedure for analysis of a clinical trial: fallback, fixed sequence, and related procedures. Stat Biopharm Res 2:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar