Skip to main content

Abstract

The treatment armamentarium of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is based on at least five TKIs, employed either in first-line CP (imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib) and in second and third line (dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib). These drugs share the same target of interest (BCR-ABL) but have profound different off-target effects. In turn, the general spectrum of adverse events experienced by the treated patients, either clinical symptoms, biochemical abnormalities, or severe AEs (or “complications”), varies considerably. SAEs are more frequent with second- and third-generation TKIs, and from this point of view, imatinib remains the safest drug. The early identification of CML patient candidates to experience more frequently SAEs with second (and third)-generation TKIs is of course part of the treatment decision process where the right balance between risk and benefit should be accomplished. Second-generation TKIs, nilotinib and dasatinib, are considered generally to be better tolerated than imatinib. However, two types of complications are described more frequently with nilotinib and ponatinib (cardiovascular, in general, and PAOD in particular) and with dasatinib (pleural effusions and pulmonary hypertension) if compared with imatinib. These two types of complications deserve a particular attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;122(6):872–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien S, Abboud CN, Akhtari M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Chronic myelogenous leukemia, Version 3, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). 2014. http://www.nccn.org.

  3. Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108:1809–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim TD, Rea D, Schwarz M, et al. Peripheral artery occlusive disease in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with nilotinib or imatinib. Leukemia. 2013;27:1316–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Labussiere-Wallet H, Guillermin Y, Etienne M, et al. Analysis of clinical arterial and metabolic parameters in chronic phase CML patients on nilotinib in a single center cohort. ASH Annu Meet Abstr. 2012;120:3756.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rea D, Mirault T, Raffoux E, et al. Usefulness of the 2012 European CVD risk assessment model to identify patients at high risk of cardiovascular events during nilotinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29(5):1206–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Larson RA, Kim DW, Issaragrilsil S, Coutre PL, Dorlhiac Llacer PE, G Etienne, Clark RE, Flinn I, Nakamae H, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, Donohue B, Deng W, Menssen HD, Hughes TP. Efficacy and safety of nilotinib (NIL) vs imatinib (IM) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): long-term follow-up (f/u) of ENESTnd [Clinically relevant abstract] program: oral and poster abstracts. Presented at ASH 2015. 2014 abstract no. 4541.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cortes JE, Kim D-W, Pinilla-Ibarz J, Le Coutre P, Paquette R, Chuah C, Nicolini FE, Apperley JF, Khoury HJ, Talpaz M, DiPersio JF, DeAngelo DJ, Abruzzese E, Rea D, Baccarani M, Müller MC, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Lustgarten S, Rivera VM, Clackson T, Turner CD, Haluska FG, Guilhot F, Deininger MW, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Shah NP, Kantarjian HM. Long-term follow-up of ponatinib efficacy and safety in the phase 2 PACE trial [Clinically relevant abstract]. Program: Oral and poster abstracts session: 632. Chronic myeloid leukemia: therapy: poster II. West Building, Level 1 (Moscone Center); 2014:Abstract 3135.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knickerbocker R, Dorer DJ, Haluska FG, Baccarani M, Cortes JE, Hochhaus A, Talpaz M. Impact of dose intensity of ponatinib on selected adverse events: multivariate analyses from a pooled population of clinical trial patients [Clinically relevant abstract] program: oral and poster abstracts. ASH 2014. 2014 abstract no. 4546.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Pinilla-Ibarz J, Coutre PL, Paquette R, Chuah C, Nicolini FE, Apperley JF, Jean Khoury H, Talpaz M, DiPersio JF, DeAngelo DJ, Abruzzese E, Rea D, Baccarani M, Müller MC, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Lustgarten S, Rivera VM, Clackson T, Turner CD, Haluska FG, Guilhot F, Deininger MW, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Shah NP, Kantarjian HM. 3135 Long-term follow-up of ponatinib efficacy and safety in the phase 2 PACE trial [Clinically relevant abstract] program: oral and poster abstracts. ASH abstract: Blood. 2013;122(21):1482.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cortes J, Saglio G, Baccarani M, Kantarjian HM, Mayer J, BoquÕ C, Shah NP, Chuah C, Casanova L, Narayanan G, Bradley-Garelik B, Manos G, Hochhaus A. Final study results of the phase 3 dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) trial (DASISION, CA180-056) [Clinically relevant abstract] program: oral and poster abstracts. ASH 2014. 2014 abstract no. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Antolini L, Mahon FX, et al. Multicenter independent assessment of outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:553–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Cortes JE, Lipton JH, et al. Safety of bosutinib versus imatinib in the phase 3 BELA trial in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:947–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hochhaus A, O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, et al. Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23:1054–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2260–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantarjian HM, Giles F, Gattermann N, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood. 2007;110:3540–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. le Coutre P, Ottmann OG, Giles F, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2008;111:1834–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aprile L, Puccetti L, Galimberti S, et al. Atherothrombotic risk and TKIs treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: a role for genetic predisposition and pro-inflammatory/pro-oxidative status? Blood. 2013;122(21):1482.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Porkka K, Khoury HJ, Paquette RL, Matloub Y, Sinha R, Cortes JE. Dasatinib 100 mg once daily minimizes the occurrence of pleural effusion in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and efficacy is unaffected in patients who develop pleural effusion. Cancer. 2010;116(2):377–86.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Latagliata R, Breccia M, Fava C, Stagno F, Tiribelli M, Luciano L, et al. Incidence, risk factors and management of pleural effusions during dasatinib treatment in unselected elderly patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Hematol Oncol. 2013;31(2):363–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Porkka K, Baccarani M, Cortes J, Hochhaus A, Kantarjian H, Shah N, et al. Pleural effusion in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) who received first-line dasatinib in the DASISION trial: patient characteristics, management, and outcomes. Haematologica. 16th Congress of the EHA. 2011. p. 692.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Borthakur G, Bruzzi J, Munden R, et al. Pleural effusion in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with dasatinib after imatinib failure. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(25):3908–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Lavallade H, Punnialingam S, Milojkovic D, Bua M, Khorashad JS, Gabriel IH, et al. Pleural effusions in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with dasatinib may have an immune-mediated pathogenesis. Br J Haematol. 2008;141(5):745–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marin D. Initial choice of therapy among plenty for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Prog. 2012;2012:115–21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Efficace F, Cardoni A, Cottone F, et al. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and patient-reported outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review. Leuk Res. 2013;37:206–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Efficace F, Baccarani M, Breccia M, et al. Health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long-term therapy with imatinib compared with the general population. Blood. 2011;118:4554–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baccarani M, Efficace F, Rosti G. Moving towards patient-centered decision-making in chronic myeloid leukemia: assessment of quality of life and symptom burden. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):205–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams LA, Gonzalez AG, Ault P, et al. Measuring the symptom burden associated with the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;122:641–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Efficace F, Baccarani M, Breccia M, et al. International development of an EORTC questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: the EORTC QLQ-CML24. Qual Life Res. 2014a;23(3):825–36.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Efficace F, Rosti G, Aaronson N, et al. Patient versus physician symptom and health status reporting in chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2014b;99(4):788–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianantonio Rosti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosti, G., Castagnetti, F., Gugliotta, G., Baccarani, M. (2016). Safety Profiles of First-Line TKIs and Managing Adverse Effects. In: Kizaki, M. (eds) Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55714-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55714-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55713-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55714-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics