Promotion of Strength Training

  • Yoshio NakamuraEmail author
  • Kazuhiro Harada


The health benefits of strength training have been well established by numerous intervention studies. Based on such studies, current physical activity guidelines recommend strength training to improve public health. However, previous reviews have not focused on the behavioral aspects of strength training. Thus, this chapter briefly reviews research trends in the prevalence and correlates of strength training, and interventions to promote strength-training behavior. Previous studies have reported 3.9–21 % of the populations in each country engage in strength-training behavior. Recent studies have begun to reveal the environmental correlates of strength-training behavior (e.g., access to strength-training facilities), as well as socio-demographic and psychosocial correlates (e.g., age, perceived health benefits, and barriers to participation). Although a community-wide campaign has been reported, intervention studies to promote strength-training behavior are limited. Further well-designed observational studies examining correlates of strength-training behavior and large-scale intervention trials are warranted to confirm effective strategies to promote strength-training behavior.


Strength training Behavioral research Behavior mechanisms Environment design Health promotion 


  1. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bopp M, Wilcox S, Oberrecht L, Kammermann S, McElmurray CT (2004) Correlates of strength training in older rural African American and Caucasian women. Women Health 40:1–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bopp M, Wilcox S, Laken M, Butler K, Carter RE, McClorin L, Yancey A (2006) Factors associated with physical activity among African-American men and women. Am J Prev Med 30:340–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown W J, Moorhead GE, Marshall AL (2005) Choose health: be active: a physical activity guide for older Australians. Commonwealth of Australia and the Repatriation Commission, Canberra.$File/choosehealth-brochure.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2015
  5. Bryan AD, Rocheleau CA (2002) Predicting aerobic versus resistance exercise using the theory of planned behavior. Am J Health Behav 26:83–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardinal BJ, Kosma M (2004) Self-efficacy and the stages and processes of change associated with adopting and marinating muscular fitness-promoting behavior. Res Q Exerc Sport 75:186–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardinal BJ, Keis JS, Ferrand C (2006) Comparison of American and French college student’s stage of change for muscular fitness-promoting behaviors. Am J Health Promot 20:388–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chevan J (2008) Demographic determinants of participation in strength training activities among U.S. adults. J Strength Cond Res 22:553–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, Minson CT, Nigg CR, Salem GJ, Skinner JS (2009) American college of sports medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1510–1530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH, Coeckelberghs E, Vanhees L (2011) Impact of resistance training on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension 58:950–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dean RN, Farrell JM, Kelley ML, Taylor MJ, Rhodes RE (2007) Testing the efficacy of the theory of planned behavior to explain strength training in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 15:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fetherman DL, Hakim RM, Sanko JP (2011) A pilot study of the application of the transtheoretical model during strength training in older women. J Women Aging 23:58–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galuska DA, Earle D, Fulton JE (2002) The epidemiology of U.S. adults who regularly engage in resistance training. Res Q Exerc Sport 73:330–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harada K, Oka K, Ota A, Shibata A, Nakamura Y (2008a) Prevalence and correlates of strength training among Japanese adults: analysis of SSF national sports-life survey 2006. Int J Sport Health Sci 6:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harada K, Oka K, Shibata A, Ota A, Okada J, Nakamura Y (2008b) Factors associated with the stages of change for strength training behavior among Japanese adults. Int J Sport Health Sci 6:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harada K, Oka K, Shibata A, Ishii K, Nakamura Y, Inoue S, Shimomitsu T (2011) Strength-training behavior and perceived environment among Japanese older adults. J Aging Phys Act 19:262–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Harada K, Shibata A, Ishii K, Liao Y, Oka K (2014a) Perceived and objective measured access to strength-training facilities and strength-training behavior. Ann Behav Med 48:120–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harada K, Shibata A, Lee E, Oka K, Nakamura Y (2014b) Associations between perceived health benefits and barriers to strength training, and stages of change for strength-training behavior among older Japanese adults. J Phys Act Health 11:801–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harada K, Shibata A, Lee E, Oka K, Nakamura Y Sources of strength-training information and strength-training behavior among Japanese older adults. Health Promot Int. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau052
  20. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A (2007) Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1423–1434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Humphries B, Duncan MJ, Mummery WK (2010) Prevalence and correlates of resistance training in a regional Australian population. Br J Sports Med 44:653–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inoue S, Murase N, Shimomitsu T, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, Takamiya T, Ishii K, Katsumura T, Sallis JF (2009) Association of physical activity and neighborhood environment among Japanese adults. Prev Med 48:321–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James MM, Carroll S (2006) High-intensity resistance training and postmenopausal bone loss: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 17:1225–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamada M, Kitayuguchi J, Inoue S, Ishikawa Y, Nishiuchi H, Okada S, Harada K, Kamioka H, Shiwaku K (2013) A community-wide campaign to promote physical activity in middle-aged and elderly people: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10:44PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katula JA, Sipe M, Rejeski WJ, Focht BC (2006) Strength training in older adults: an empowering intervention. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:106–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelley GA, Kelley KS (2009) Impact of progressive resistance training on lipids and lipoproteins in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prev Med 48:9–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kruger J, Brown DR, Galuska DA, Bunchner D (2004) Strength training among adults aged ≥65 years: United States, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 53:25–28Google Scholar
  28. Kruger J, Carlson S, Kohl H (2006) Trends in strength training: Unite States, 1998–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55:769–772Google Scholar
  29. Liu CJ, Latham N (2011) Can progressive resistance strength training reduce physical disability in older adults? A meta-analysis study. Disabil Rehabil 33:87–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morrow JR Jr, Bain TM, Frierson GM, Trudelle-Jackson E, Haskell WL (2011) Long-term tracking of physical activity behaviors in women: the WIN Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:165–170PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C (2007) Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1435–1445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, Cooper AR, Crank H, Ekelund U, Fox KR, Gately P, Giles-Corti B, Gill JM, Hamer M, McDermott I, Murphy M, Mutrie N, Reilly JJ, Saxton JM, Stamatakis E (2010) The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and exercise sciences. J Sports Sci 28:573–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H, Cavill N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons CF, Mutrie N, Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (2007) Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ 334:1204PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Panter JR, Jones A (2010) Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: what do and don’t we know? J Phys Act Health 7:551–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Plotnikoff RC, Courneya KS, Trinh L, Karunamuni N, Sigal RJ (2008) Aerobic physical activity and resistance training: an application of the theory of planned behavior among adults with type 2 diabetes in a random, national sample of Canadians. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:61PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1983) Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 51:390–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Public Health Agency of Canada (1998) Handbook for Canada’s physical activity guide to healthy active living. Accessed 11 Sept 2010
  38. Rhodes RE, Blanchard CM, Matheson DH (2007) Motivational antecedent beliefs of endurance, strength, and flexibility activities. Psychol Health Med 12:148–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saelens BE, Handy SL (2008) Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:S550–S566PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 25:80–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sallis JF, Johnson MF, Calfas KJ, Caparosa S, Nichols JF (1997) Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 68:345–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fotheringham MJ (2000) Behavioral epidemiology: a systematic framework to classify phases of research on health promotion and disease prevention. Ann Behav Med 22:294–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J (2006) An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 27:297–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sasakawa Sports Foundation (2006) The 2006 SSF national sports-life survey. Sasakawa Sports Foundation, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  45. Shirazi KK, Wallace LM, Niknami S, Hidarnia A, Torkaman G, Gilchrist M, Faghihzadeh S (2007) A home-based, transtheoretical change model designed strength training intervention to increase exercise to prevent osteoporosis in Iranian women aged 40–65 years: a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res 22:305–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strasser B, Siebert U, Schoberberger W (2010) Resistance training in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of resistance training on metabolic clustering in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism. Sports Med 40:397–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. US Department of Health and Human Services (2008) 2008 Physical activity guidelines for American. Accessed 11 Sept 2010
  48. US Department of Health and Human Services (2009) Healthy people 2020. Accessed 11 Sept 2010
  49. World Health Organizations (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Accessed 3 Dec 2013
  50. Yang L, Sahlqvist S, McMinn A, Griffin SJ, Ogilvie D (2010) Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review. BMJ 341:5293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zimmerman MA (1995) Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol 23:581–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Sport SciencesWaseda UniversitySaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Section for Motor Function ActivationNational Center for Gerontology and GerontologyAichiJapan

Personalised recommendations