Abstract
This chapter addresses a problem that is salient in the human factors and ergonomics communities regarding the inconsistent connections between subjective ratings of workload and actual performance. Previous work with vigilance tasks showed that a substantial part of subjective workload, and further connections to actual performance, were associated with psychosocial variables related to elasticity as defined in the cusp catastrophe models for cognitive workload and fatigue. The empirical study presented in this chapter was conducted with the data set described in earlier chapters. The influence of cognitive variables, compared to psychosocial variables, is much stronger in financial decision making contexts. It now appears that context is highly relevant for determining which psychosocial or ability variables best explain individual differences in subjective ratings of workload, all situational variables considered equal. Context, furthermore, affects the combination of psychosocial variables, abilities, and subjective ratings that result in performance dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blanchette, I. (Ed.). (2014). Emotion and reasoning. New York: Psychology Press.
Boring, E. G. (1950). History of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Corr, P. J. (2010). Individual differences in cognition: In search of a general model of behavior control. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition (pp. 3–26). New York: Springer.
De Neys, W., & Osman, M. (Eds.). (2014). New approaches in reasoning research. New York: Psychology Press.
Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., & Szymura, B. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of individual differences in cognition (pp. 3–26). New York: Springer.
Guastello, S. J., Shircel, A., Malon, M., & Timm, P. (2015). Individual differences in the experience of cognitive workload. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16, 20–52.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.
Karwowski, W. (2000). Symvatology: The science of an artifact-human compatibility. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1, 76–91.
Mykytyn, P. P., Jr. (1989). Group embedded figures test (GEFT): Individual differences, performance, and learning effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 951–959.
NASA Ames Research Center (n.d.). NASA Task Load Index (TLX) 1.0: Paper and pencil package. Moffett Field: Author. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from http://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/paperpencil.html
Nygren, T. E. (1991). Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: Implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload. Human Factors, 33, 17–33.
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologia, 32, 301–345.
Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.
Wilhelms, E. A., & Reyna, V. F. (Eds.). (2015). Neuroeconomics, judgment, and decision making. New York: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guastello, S.J. (2016). Individual Differences in the Assessment of Cognitive Workload. In: Guastello, S. (eds) Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in Financial Decision Making. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 13. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55312-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55312-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55311-3
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55312-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)