Abstract
Marginal willingness to pay for public investment under urban environmental risk is considered in this chapter. In particular, we show a model that takes into account a bounded rationality on the ability of risk perception, information situation, and people’s threshold acceptance of risk. Then, as one case study of urban environmental risk, the evaluation of risk in municipal water use is shown. In order to investigate the information situation and risk perception of people, a survey is conducted using questionnaires. The survey reveals that risk awareness is a factor in drinking water, and that people change their choice based on risk information. Then, the effects of information on risk and public investment are considered. From some numerical examples, marginal willingness to pay is found to be low in the case of high risk, because of consumers’ self-defensive activities. In other words, marginal willingness to pay for public investment is high when there is no or little averting behaviour. Moreover, it is shown that consumers’ perception of risk is largely dependent on information on risk, countermeasures taken by public authorities, and overconfidence in private averting goods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Asahi, C., & Hagihara, K. (1999). Evaluating environmental risk in drinking water. Studies in Environmental System, 27, 395–401 (in Japanese).
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2000). Walrasian economics in retrospect. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1411–1439.
Crocker, T. D., Forster, B. A., & Shogren, J. F. (1991). Valuing potential groundwater protection benefits. Water Resources Research, 27, 1–6.
Desvousges, W. H., Reed, J. F., & Spencer, B. H. (1998). Environmental policy analysis with limited information. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Freeman, A. M. (1995). Evaluating changes in risk perceptions by revealed preference. In D. W. Bromley (Ed.), The handbook of environmental economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Gurian, P. L., Small, M. J., Lockwood, J. R., & Schervish, M. J. (2001). Benefit-cost estimation for alternative drinking water maximum contaminant levels. Water Resources Research, 37, 2213–2226.
Hagihara, K. (1996). Comprehensive urban economic studies. Comprehensive Urban Studies, 60, 95–104 (in Japanese).
Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (1990). Measuring the benefits of water quality improvement. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 8, 195–201.
Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (2004). The role of environmental valuation in public policymaking: The case of urban waterside area in Japan. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22, 3–13.
Hagihara, Y., et al. (2000). Planning on rain water environment in urban areas: An approach by the systems analysis. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo (in Japanese).
Hahnel, R., & Albert, M. (1990). Quiet revolution in welfare economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hanley, N., & Spash, C. L. (1993). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hanley, N., Shogren, J. F., & White, B. (1997). Environmental economics in theory and practice. Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
Heap, S. H., Hollis, M., Lyons, B., Sugden, R., & Weale, A. (1992). The theory of choice- A critical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Jones-Lee, M. G., & Loomes, G. (1997). Valuing health and safety: Some economic and psychological issues. In R. Nau (Ed.), The economic and environmental risk and uncertainty- New models and methods. Dordrecht: Academic.
Jordan, J. F., & Elnagheeb, A. H. (1993). Willingness to pay for improvements in drinking water quality. Water Resources Research, 29, 237–245.
Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L., & Schmitz, A. (1982). Applied welfare economics and public policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kask, S. B., & Shogren, J. F. (1994). Benefit transfer protocol for long-term health risk valuation: A case of surface water contamination. Water Resources Research, 30, 2813–2823.
Kreps, D. M. (1990). A course in microeconomic theory. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matsubara, N. (1992). Statistical decision making. Tokyo: The University of the Air Press (in Japanese).
McConnell, K. E., & Rosado, M. A. (2000). Valuing discrete improvements in drinking water quality through revealed preferences. Water Resources Research, 36, 1575–1582.
Mitchell, R., & Carson, R. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: Contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Niels, C. L. (1992). A national standard for risk analysis. Risk Abstract, 9, 1–3.
Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modelling bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Shogren, J. F. (1990). Impact of self-protection and self-insurance on individual response to risk. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 3, 191–204.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 286–285.
Suzumura, K. (1999). Paretian welfare judgements and Bergsonian social choice. The Economic Journal, 109, 204–220.
Syme, G. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). The psychology of drinking water quality: An exploratory study. Water Resources Research, 29, 4003–4010.
Acknowledgements
This paper has originally presented at the second DPRI-IIASA International Symposium on Integrated Disaster Risk Management : Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, July 2002. We have benefited from discussion with especially Professor Norio Okada on earlier drafts.
This paper has originally published in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2004, volume 22, pages 349–362, Pion LTD, London; www.pion.co.uk and www.envplan.com. We would like to thank the publishers for their permission to use the material here.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hagihara, K., Asahi, C., Hagihara, Y. (2016). Marginal Willingness to Pay for Public Investment Under Urban Environmental Risk: The Case of Municipal Water Use. In: Hagihara, K., Asahi, C. (eds) Coping with Regional Vulnerability. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 4. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55169-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55169-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55168-3
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55169-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)