Recent Developments on Reaction Automata Theory: A Survey

Chapter
Part of the Mathematics for Industry book series (MFI, volume 9)

Abstract

This paper surveys recent developments on the theory of reaction automata, which has been lately initiated in [17] to model and analyze in the computational framework the behaviors of biochemical reactions in nature. Reaction automata (RAs) have been proposed as computing models for accepting string languages. RAs may be taken as a kind of an extension of reaction systems in that they deal with multisets rather than (usual) sets being dealt with in reaction systems. A computation process by an RA is performed in such a way that after taking in the system an input symbol from the environment, the RA changes its state (represented by a multiset) by applying reaction rules to the multiset in the manner designated, where the maximally parallel manner is considered as well as the (usual) sequential manner. An input sequence of symbols is accepted if the RA stays in a final state (i.e., a designated multiset) at some moment after reading through the input. Thus, RAs may also be regarded as a variant of finite automata in which multisets are used to play a role of (unbounded number of) states. The presented results are all from [16, 17, 18] and include: RAs have the Turing universal computation power, the computation power of exponential-bounded RAs coincides with that of the linear-bounded Turing machines, the computation power of linear-bounded RAs is incomparable to that of pushdown automata. Further, the case for RAs with sequential mode of rule applications is also investigated.

Keywords

Models of biochemical reactions Reaction automata Multisets Chomsky hierarchy Turing computability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work of F. Okubo was in part supported by Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) No.24700304, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The work of T.Yokomori was in part supported by a Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects: 2012B-050 and 2013B-063, and also by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas "Molecular Robotics" (No.24104003) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    Alhazov, A., Verlan, S.: Minimization strategies for maximally parallel multiset rewriting systems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 412, 1587–1591 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calude, C., Păun, Gh, Rozenberg, G, Salomaa, A. (eds.): Multiset Processing. LNCS 2235, Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Csuhaj-Varju, E., Ibarra, O.H., Vaszil, G.Y.: On the computational complexity of P automata. Nat. Comput. 5, 109–126 (2006)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csuhaj-Varju, E., Oswald, M., Vaszil, Gy., P automata, in The Oxford Handbook of Membrane Computing, pp.145-167, 2010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csuhaj-Varju, E., Vaszil, Gy.: P Automata or Purely Communicating Accepting P Systems, pp. 219–233. LNCS 2597, Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehrenfeucht, A., Rozenberg, G.: Reaction systems. Fundam. Inf. 75, 263–280 (2007)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ehrenfeucht, A., Rozenberg, G.: Events and modules in reaction systems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 376, 3–16 (2007)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ehrenfeucht, A., Rozenberg, G.: Introducing time in reaction systems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 410, 310–322 (2009)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehrenfeucht, A., Main, M., Rozenberg, G.: Combinatorics of life and death in reaction systems. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 21, 345–356 (2010)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ehrenfeucht, A., Main, M., Rozenberg, G.: Functions defined by reaction systems. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 22, 167–178 (2011)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freund, R., Oswald, M.: A short note on analysing P systems. Bull. EATCS 79, 231–236 (2002)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, T., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Language and Computation, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kudlek, M., Martin-Vide, C., Păun, Gh.: Toward a formal macroset theory. In: Calude, C., Păun, Gh., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Multiset Processing, pp. 123–134. LNCS 2235, Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kudlek, M., Totzke, P., Zetzsche, G.: Properties of multiset language classes defined by multiset pushdown automata. Fundam. Inf. 93, 235–244 (2009)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hirvensalo, M.: On probabilistic and quantum reaction systems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 429, 134–143 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okubo, F.: Reaction automata working in sequential manner. RAIRO Theor. Inf. Appl. 48, 23–38 (2014)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okubo, F., Kobayashi, S., Yokomori, T.: Reaction automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 429, 247–257 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okubo, F., Kobayashi, S., Yokomori, T.: On the properties of language classes defined by bounded reaction automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 454, 206–221 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Păun, Gh., Pérez-Jiménez, M.J.: P and dP automata: a survey. In: Calude, C., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Maurer Festschrift. LNCS 6570, Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Păun, Gh., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.): Handbook of Membrane Computing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.): Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3. Springer, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salomaa, A.: Formal Languages. Academic Press, New York (1973)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salomaa, A.: On State sequences defined by reaction systems. In: Constable, R.L., Silva A. (eds.) Logic and Program Semantics, pp. 271–282. LNCS 7230, Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salomaa, A.: Functions and sequences generated by reaction systems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 466, 871–96 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suzuki, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Takabayashi, J., Tanaka,H.: Artificial Life applications of a class of P systems. In: Calude, C., Păun, Gh., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Multiset Processing, pp. 299–346. LNCS 2235, Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and ScienceKyushu UniversityNishi-kuJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and SciencesWaseda UniversityShinjuku-KuJapan

Personalised recommendations