Influence of the Corporation Tax Rate on GDP in an Agent-Based Artificial Economic System

Conference paper
Part of the Agent-Based Social Systems book series (ABSS, volume 11)

Abstract

An agent-based model of an artificial economic system, including the government, was developed on the basis of the authors’ previous model. This model was used to analyze the factors influencing the relationship between GDP and the corporation tax rate and its mechanism. The findings show that executive compensation and the use of producers’ own cash for investment are both indispensable factors for reproducing the negative correlation between GDP and the corporation tax rate, because these actions help redistribute the firm’s surplus money to the market. Inefficiency in government expenditure is another indispensable condition. The calculated average multipliers for the reduction of both income tax and corporation tax are in good agreement with real data based on the macroeconometric model.

Keywords

Agent-based computational economics Corporation tax Expenditure policy GDP Government Income tax Tax rate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 23510182, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)).

References

  1. 1.
    Terano T (2008) Beyond the KISS principle for agent-based social simulation. J Socio Inform 1(1):175–187Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amman HM, Tesfatsion L, Kendrick DA, Judd KL, Rust J (eds) (2006) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam [Access online]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farmer JD, Foley D (2009) The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460(7256):685–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Croson R, Gachter S (2010) The science of experimental economics. J Econ Behav Organ 73(1):122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ashraf Q, Gershman B, Howitt P (2011) Banks, market organization, and macroeconomic performance: an agent-based computational analysis (No. w17102). National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russo A, Catalano M, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Napoletano M (2007) Industrial dynamics, fiscal policy and R&D: evidence from a computational experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 64(3):426–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2010) Schumpeter meeting Keynes: a policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1748–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruun C (2003) The economy as an agent-based whole—simulating Schumpeterian dynamics. Industry Innov 10(4):475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruun C (2000) Growth and inequality in agent-based models—effect of introducing a wealth tax. Institut for Økonomi, Politik og Forvaltning, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dawid H, Gemkow S, Harting P, Kabus K, Wersching K, Neugart M (2008) Skills, innovation, and growth: an agent-based policy analysis. J Econ Stat 228(2):251–275Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2012) Debt, deleveraging and business cycles: an agent-based perspective. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6(27):1–49Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sprigg JA, Ehlen MA (2004) Full employment and competition in the Aspen economic model: implications for modeling acts of terrorism (No. SAND2004–5500). Sandia National Laboratories, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ogibayashi S, Takashima K (2009) Multi-agent simulation of fund circulation in an artificial economic system involving self-adjusting mechanism of price, production and investment. ICIC Express Lett 4(3):877–884Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogibayashi S, Takashima K (2013) Influence of government expenditure policies and tax rate on GDP in an agent-based artificial economic system. In: Murata T, Terano T, Takahashi S (eds) Agent-based approaches in economic and social complex systems, vol VII. Springer, Tokyo, pp 147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krugman P, Wells R (2009) Economics, 2nd edn. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sakuma T (2011) The ESRI short-run macroeconometric model of the Japanese economy: basic structure, multipliers, and economic policy analyses (2011 version). ESRI Discussion Paper Series, 259, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Tokyo, pp 41–44Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (2011) Annual report on national accounts of 2009, January 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chiba Institute of TechnologyNarashinoJapan

Personalised recommendations