Support of Describing Service Delivery Processes in Consideration of Service Function Models on Service CAD System

  • Wataru Miura
  • Satoshi Shimada
  • Taiki Ogata
  • Jun Ota
  • Tamio Arai
  • Tatsunori Hara


The authors have been developing a service CAD system called Service Explorer in the context of service engineering research. This system uses a function modeling technique in product design and a process modeling technique for service delivery in the marketing field. However, concrete supports for interrelating the two different models have not yet been developed. In this study, we propose a method for supporting the description of service delivery processes by using the workflow patterns, which consist of many patterns such as synchronization and conditional branches. Designers need to choose an appropriate pattern among predefined patterns in deploying a service function for the service delivery processes. However, choosing an appropriate pattern may be difficult for designers because doing so greatly depends on both knowledge of process modeling and the detail level of process modeling. Therefore, we structure patterns with the ISM (interpretive structural modeling) method based on associations among them so that designers can easily specify the proper patterns on the service CAD system.


CAD Delivery process Function Workflow patterns 



This research was partially supported by JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists 24300050.


  1. 1.
    Shimomura Y, Tomiyama T (2005) Service modeling for service engineering. Int Federation Inform Process 167:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shostack GL (1984) Designing services that deliver. Harv Bus Rev 62:133–139Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hara T, Arai T, Shimomura Y (2009) A modeling method of services on their contents and delivery processes. Int Conf Eng Design 4:323–332Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimomura Y, Hara T, Arai T (2009) A unified representation scheme for effective PSS development. CIRP Ann Manuf Tech 58:379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hara T, Arai T, Shimomura Y, Sakao T (2009) Service CAD system to integrate product and human activity for total value. CIRP J Manuf Sci Tech 1:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    White SA (2004) Introduction to BPMN. IBM Cooperation 2.0:1–11Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM, Kiepuszewski B, Barros AP (2000) Workflow patterns. BETA Working Paper Series 14:5–51Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warfield JN (1973) Binary matrices in system modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arai T, Shimomura Y (2004) Proposal of service CAD system: a tool for service engineering. CIRP Ann Manufacturing Tech 53:397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fontela E, Gabus A (1976) The DEMATEL observer. DEMATEL 1976 ReportGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barros A, Dumas M (2005) Service interaction patterns: towards a reference framework for service-based business process interconnection. Technical report FIT-TR-2005-02, Faculty of IT, Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wataru Miura
    • 1
  • Satoshi Shimada
    • 1
  • Taiki Ogata
    • 1
  • Jun Ota
    • 1
  • Tamio Arai
    • 2
  • Tatsunori Hara
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan
  2. 2.Shibaura Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations