The Innovator’S Dilemma in Collaboration

Part of the Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science book series (EESCS, volume 21)




  1. 1.
    Christensen C. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delmestri G, Montanari F, Usai A. Reputation and strength of ties in predicting commercial success and artistic merit of independents in the Italian feature film industry*. J Manag Stud. 2005;42(5):975–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gersick CJG, Hackman JR. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1990;47:65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorman JC, Cooke NJ. Changes in team cognition after a retention interval: the benefits of mixing it up. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011;17(4):303–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gorman JC, Amazeen PG, Cooke NJ. Team coordination dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010;14(3):265–89.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goto A, Motohashi K. Construction of a Japanese patent database and a first look at Japanese patenting activities. Res Policy. 2007;36(9):1431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griliches Z. R&D and productivity-the economic evidence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guimera R, et al. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science. 2005;308(5722):697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8498; 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inoue H. Evidence for a creative dilemma posed by repeated collaborations. PloS One. 2015;10(9):e0137418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inoue H, Liu Y. Revealing the intricate effect of collaboration on innovation. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janis IL. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin School; 1982.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones BF. The burden of knowledge and the ‘Death of the renaissance man’: is innovation getting harder? NBER Working Paper Series; 2005.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin Sci Q. 1982;27:81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, editors. Handbook of psychology, vol. 12. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003, p. 333–75.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lai R, et al. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U. S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Technical report the Harvard Dataverse Network; 2012, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merton RK. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perretti F, Negro G. Mixing genres and matching people: a study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. J Organ Behav. 2007;28(5):563–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porac JF, et al. Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams. Res Policy. 2004;33(4):661–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B. How to make the team: social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin Sci Q. 2004;49(1):101–33.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schwab A, Miner AS. Learning in hybrid-project systems: the effects of project performance on repeated collaboration. Acad Manag J. 2008;51:1117–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skilton PF, Dooley KJ. The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Acad Manag Rev. 2010;35(1):118–34.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uzzi B, Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem1. Am J Sociol. 2005;111(2):447–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007;316(5827):1036–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Simulation StudiesUniversity of HyogoKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations