Abstract
Through decentralization policy in 2001, the central government of Indonesia has transferred tasks to plan, execute and evaluate rural development to village government . Nevertheless, to be successful, sufficient local capacity is needed. This study aims to measure capacity of rural institutions , realization of capacity to address livelihood problems and capacity development delivered by the government. It focuses on village officers , neighborhood group , village parliament and village development committee . Through cases study in Serang, Kedarpan and Sumilir villages, it was found that majority of capacity indicators were perceived to be good enough. However, capacity realization was hampered by the problem of weak coordination . Village head, culturally the highest patron in village, was still too dominant and delimitating the other institutions to perform their tasks. Such condition was exacerbated because district government put emphasis on capacity development of village officers at the expense of neighborhood group, village parliament and village development committee. This study recommends that to make more balanced power relation among rural institutions, the government should develop individual capacity of village parliament, village development committee and neighborhood group.
An erratum to this chapter is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54774-7_11
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54774-7_11
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2004, the laws were revised into Law 32/2004 on Regional Governance and Law 33/2004 on Fiscal Balance.
- 2.
Summarized from the interview with the head of Kedarpan parliament in February 23rd, 2012, the head of Sumilir parliament in January 18th, 2012 and the head of Serang parliament in February 2nd, 2012.
- 3.
Summarized from the interview with the head of Kedarpan village in January 12th, 2012; the head of Kedarpan parliament in February 23rd, 2012, the head of Sumilir parliament in January 18th, 2012; and the head of Serang parliament in February 2nd, 2012.
- 4.
Interview with the head of Sumilir village development committee in January 18th, 2012 and the head of Kedarpan village development committee in February 23rd, 2012.
- 5.
Interview with the head of Serang village in February 2nd, 2012.
- 6.
Conducted in Kedarpan on March 19th, 2011.
- 7.
Interview with the head of Kedarpan village in January 12th, 2012.
- 8.
Interview with the secretary of Kemangkon sub-district in January 28th, 2012.
References
Alatas V et al (2001) Voice lessons: local government organizations, social organizations and the quality of local governance. The World Bank Indonesia, Jakarta
Antlöv H (2000) Village governance in Indonesia: past, present and future challenges. Paper presented at the conference of dynamic of local politic in Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 3–7 July 2000
Antlöv H (2003) Village government and rural development in Indonesia: the new democratic framework. Bull Indonesian Econ Stud 39(2):193–214
Aref F et al (2009) Assessing community leadership factor in community capacity building in tourism development: a case study of Shiraz, Iran. J Hum Ecol 28(3):171–176
Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27(12):2021–2044
Bebbington A et al (2006) Local capacity, village governance, and the political economy of rural development in Indonesia. World Dev 34(11):1958–1976
Blair H (2000) Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Dev 28(1):21–39
Central Java Local Planning Agency (2010) Analysis on poverty alleviation in Central Java province. Local Planning Agency, Semarang
Chetri AK et al (2007) Intervention on livelihood management through community based organization: case of rural Nepal. J Int Dev Coop 13(1):187–206
Cohen JM, Peterson SB (1997) Administrative decentralization : a new framework for improved governance, accountability, and performance. Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge
CSA (2010) Trend of selected socio-economic indicators of Indonesia 2010. CSA, Jakarta
Dharmawan L (2002) Dynamics of local capacity and village governance: findings from the second Indonesian local level institutions study. The World Bank Indonesia, Jakarta
Evers PJ (2000) Resourceful villagers, powerless communities (rural village government in Indonesia). The World Bank Indonesia, Jakarta
Goodman R et al (1998) Idenfiying and defining the dimension of community capacity to provide a base for measurement. Health Educ Bahav J 25:258–278
Hadiz VR (2004) Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: a critique of neo-institutionalist perspectives. Dev Change 35(4):697–718
Irawanto DW (2011) Exploring paternalistic leadership and its application to the Indonesian context. Massey University, New Zealand
JICA (2004) Capacity development: handbook for JICA Staff. JICA, Tokyo
Johnson C (2001) Local Democracy, democratic decentralization and rural development: theories, challenges and options for policy. Dev Policy Rev 19(4):521–532
Joshi NM, Maharjan KL (2007) Institutional changes in forest resource management and change in forest coverage in Nepal. J Int Dev Coop 13(1):231–252
Jutting J et al (2005) What makes decentralisation in developing countries pro-poor? Eur J Dev Res 17(4):626–648
Kedarpan Village Government (2010) Final report of village allocation fund (VAF) of Kedarpan village 2010. Kedarpan Village Government, Purbalingga
Mizrahi Y (2004) Capacity enhancement indicators. World Bank Institute, Washington
Mulder N (1996) The ideology of Javanese-Indonesian leadership. In: Antlöv H, Cederroth S (eds) Leadership in Java: gentle hints, authoritarian rule. Curzon, Great Britain, pp 57–72
Parker AN (1995) Decentralization: the way forward for rural development? . World Bank, Washington
Purbalingga CSA (2011a) Karangreja sub-district in figure, 2010. Purbalingga CSA, Purbalingga
Purbalingga CSA (2011b) Kejobong sub-district in figure, 2010. Purbalingga CSA, Purbalingga
Purbalingga CSA (2011c) Kemangkon sub-district in figure, 2010. Purbalingga CSA, Purbalingga
Purbalingga District Government (2010) Document of Purbalingga district budget 2010 (Mimeo). Purbalingga District Government, Purbalingga
Purbalingga Local Planning Agency (2006) Medium term development plan of Purbalingga, 2006–2011. Purbalingga Local Planning Agency, Purbalingga
Ranis T, Stewart F (1994) Decentralization in Indonesia. Bull Indonesian Econ Stud 30(3):41–72
Ricketts KG (2005) The importance of community leadership to successful rural communities in Florida. Ph.D. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Florida, Florida
Rondinelli DA, Cheema GS (2007) From government decentralization to decentralized governance. In: Rondinelli DA, Cheema GS (eds) Decentralizing governance, emerging concepts and practices. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 1–20
Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton
Serang Village Government (2010) Final report of village allocation fund (VAF) of Serang village, 2010. Serang Village Government, Purbalingga
Smoke P, Lewis BD (1996) Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: a new approach to an old idea. World Dev 24(8):1281–1299
Sumilir Village Government (2010) Final report of village allocation fund (VAF) of Sumilir village, 2010. Sumilir Village Government, Purbalingga
Takeshi I (2006) The dynamics of local governance reform in decentralizing Indonesia: participatory planning and village empowerment in Bandung, West Java. Asian Afr Area Stud 5(2):137–183
Tinker I, Walker M (1973) Planning for regional development in Indonesia. Asian Surv 13(12):1102–1120
UNDP (2002) Capacity for development, new solution to old problems. Earthscan Publications Ltd, New York
Uphoff N (1985) Local institutions and decentralisation for development. In: Hye HA (ed) Decentralisation, local government institutions and resource mobilisation. Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development, Bangladesh, pp 43–78
Uphoff N (1986) Local institutional development: an analytical sourcebook with cases. Kumarian, West Hartford
Uphoff N (2004) Local communities and institutions: realizing their potential for integrated rural development . In: Wijayaratna CM (ed) Role of local communities and institutions in integrated rural development. Asian Productivity Organization, New Zeland, pp 63–84
Uphoff N et al (1998) Reasons for success: learning from instructive experiences in rural development. Vistaar Publications, New Delhi
Velsink IS (1996) Traditional leadership in rural Java. In: Antlöv H, Cederroth S (eds) Leadership in Java: gentle hints, authoritarian rule. Curzon, Great Britain, pp 33–56
Widianingsih I (2005) Local Governance, decentralization, and participatory planning in Indonesia: seeking a new path to a harmonious society. In: Ahmad R (ed) The role of public administration in building a harmonious society. ADB, Philippines, pp 69–89
World Bank (2006) Making the new Indonesia work for the poor. The World Bank Indonesia, Jakarta
World Bank (2007) Spending for development: making the most of Indonesia's new opportunities. World Bank, Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sutiyo, Maharjan, K.L. (2014). Capacity of Rural Institutions in Implementing Decentralized Development in Indonesia: Case of Three Villages in Purbalingga District, Central Java Province. In: Maharjan, K. (eds) Communities and Livelihood Strategies in Developing Countries. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54774-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54774-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54773-0
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54774-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)