Skip to main content

Design of Risk Monitor for Nuclear Reactor Plants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress of Nuclear Safety for Symbiosis and Sustainability

Abstract

In this chapter, the method of how to comprise a concept of “plant Defense-in-Depth (DiD) risk monitor” and “reliability monitor” for nuclear power plant is discussed in detail. The discussion starts on the definition of risk and risk ranking on the items of (a) design principle of nuclear safety, (b) risk to be monitored, (c) severe accident phenomena, and (d) risk ranking. After analyzing the anatomy of fault event occurrence from the view of common mode failure and considering the semiotic modeling of nuclear power plant as a whole by utilizing multilevel flow model (MFM), the image of distributed human-machine interface system of plant DiD risk monitor and reliability monitor is introduced. Also discussion is made on how to visualize risk state intuitively as “dynamic risk monitor” as the display to human. Then an example practice is presented for containment spray system of PWR by the proposed concept of “reliability monitor” with the application of FMEA and GO-FLOW analysis. The formation of “plant DiD risk monitor” by utilization of revised MFM will be the next step study for configuring the proposed concept for the “plant DiD risk monitor.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. H. Morikawa, H. Watanabe, The main control board upgrade project at the Ikata power station for units 1 and 2, in Proceedings of 7th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Interface Technologies (NPIC6HMIT 2010), Las Vegas, 7–11 November 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Filippi, L. Norros, D. Pirius, F. Dionis, NMOTION project, the European project for defining the research roadmap on HF, I&C and HIS for NPPs, in Proceedings of 7th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Interface Technologies (NPIC6HMIT 2010), Las Vegas, 7–11 November 2010

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Yoshikawa, Distributed HMI system for managing all span of plant control and maintenance. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 41(3), 237–246 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Yoshikawa, M. Yang, Study on integrated method for constructing proactive trouble prevention knowledge base, in Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE18), Xi’an, China, 17–21 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Yoshikawa, M. Yang, M. Lind, K. Tamayama, K. Okusa, Development of semiotic framework of proactive trouble prevention knowledge base system and its application for FBR prototype plant “Monju”, in Proceedings of 7th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Interface Technologies (NPIC6HMIT 2010), Las Vegas, 7–11 November 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Mizuno, K. Okusa, K. Tamayama, Human interface of distributed plant monitoring and diagnosis system at “Monju”, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Symbiotic Nuclear Power Systems for 21st Century (ISSNP), Tsuruga, 9–11 July 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Lind, Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants. Appl. Artif. Intell. 8(2), 259–283 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Lind, Knowledge representation for integrated plant operation and maintenance, in Proceedings of 7th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2010), Las Vegas, 7–11 November 2010

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Lind, A goal-function approach to analysis of control situation, in Proceedings of 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Human–Machine Systems, Valenciennes, August 31–September 3 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. For the example of FMEA method. See http://www.npd-solutions.com/fmea.html (As of January 2010)

  11. T. Matsuoka, System Reliability Analysis Method GO-FLOW for Probabilistic Safety Assessment (CRC Sogo Kenkyusho, 1996, in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Petrangelli, Nuclear Safety (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Yang, Z. Zhang, H. Yoshikawa, M. Lind, K. Ito, K. Tamayama, K. Okusa, Integrated method for constructing knowledge base system for proactive trouble prevention of nuclear power plant. Int. J. Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2(2), 140–15 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study is supported by the 111 project on Nuclear Power Safety and Simulation (b08047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidekazu Yoshikawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yoshikawa, H., Yang, M., Hashim, M., Lind, M., Zhang, Z. (2014). Design of Risk Monitor for Nuclear Reactor Plants. In: Yoshikawa, H., Zhang, Z. (eds) Progress of Nuclear Safety for Symbiosis and Sustainability. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54610-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54610-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54609-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54610-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics