Skip to main content

Toward an Asian Economic Community?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1101 Accesses

Abstract

The Asia and Pacific region has emerged as the growth pole of the world economy especially since 2000. However, in the aftermath of the 2008–2009 global financial crisis, sustaining the dynamism of Asian and Pacific economies would require a rebalancing in favor of greater domestic consumption and exploiting the potential of regional economic integration. This chapter argues that broader regional economic integration in Asia within the Comprehensive Economic Partnership of East Asia (CEPEA) framework, proposed for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)+6 countries could be an engine of growth for not only the participating countries but also has the potential to enhance the welfare of the rest of the world by unleashing the synergies of Asian countries for trade creation besides making the region emerge as the third pole of the world economy alongside the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the European Union (EU). ASEAN members are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. The +6 countries are the People’s Republic of China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and India. Furthermore, monetary and financial cooperation in the region has further possibilities of generating additional aggregate demand for sustaining their dynamism by efficiently intermediating between the region’s excess savings and unmet investment needs. By forming credible schemes of regional economic integration, Asia will be able to seek its due place in global economic governance and contribute to building a more democratic and multipolar world economy. Asian economic integration by increasing the interdependence of countries in the region will also ensure peace and stability.

Earlier versions of this chapter were presented as papers at the Conference on The Future of South-South Economic Relations held at The Frederick S. Pardee Centre for the Study of the Longer Range Future, Boston University, US on 24 September 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ASEAN+3 members are 10 ASEAN countries plus the People’s Republic of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea.

  2. 2.

    The survey took place at the World Economic Forum’s New Asian Leaders Retreat in Seoul in June 2003, covering all participants and invitees and other Asian-based global leaders for tomorrow.

References

  • Agarwala, R., & De, P. (2008). Reducing global imbalances and accelerating growth: Role of regional financial cooperation in Asia. In N. Kumar et al. (Eds.), Asia’s new regionalism and global role: Agenda for the East Asia Summit (pp. 203–220). New Delhi and Singapore: RIS and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB), & ADB Institute (ADBI). (2009). Infrastructure for a seamless Asia. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., Roland-Holst, D., & Zhai, F. (2005). Growth, trade, and integration: Long-term scenarios of developing Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPEA Study Group. (2008). Report of the track two study group on comprehensive economic partnership in East Asia (CEPEA). Tokyo. 20 June. http://www.thaifta.com/thaifta/Portals/0/cepea_report.pdf.

  • CEPEA Study Group. (2009). Phase II Report of the track two study group on comprehensive economic partnership in East Asia (CEPEA). Tokyo. 3 July. http://www.dfat.gov.au/asean/eas/cepea-phase-2-report.pdf.

  • East Asia Summit. (2009). Chairman’s statement of the 4th East Asia Summit. Hua Hin. 25 October. http://www.15thaseansummit-th.org/PDF/25-08_EAS%20Statement.pdf.

  • ESCAP. (2010). Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific 2010. Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. http://www.unescap.org/pdd/publications/survey2010/download/Survey2010.pdf.

  • ESCAP. (2011). Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific 2011. Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. http://www.unescap.org/survey2011.

  • ESCAP. (2012). Growing together: Economic integration for an inclusive and sustainable Asia-Pacific Century. Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. http://www.unescap.org/pdd/publications/themestudy2012/index.asp.

  • Frost, E. L. (2008). Asia’s new regionalism. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, M., & Motonoshi, T. (2005). Macroeconomic interdependence in East Asia: Empirical evidence and issues. In Asian Development Bank (Ed.), Asian economic cooperation and integration: Progress, prospects, challenges (pp. 213–268). Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, M., & Wignaraja, G. (2008). EAFTA or CEPEA. Which way forward? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 25(2), 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (Ed.). (2004). Towards and Asian economic community: Vision of a new Asia. New Delhi and Singapore: RIS and Institute for Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2005). A broader Asian community and a possible roadmap. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(36), 3926–3931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Kesavapany, K., & Yao, C. (Eds.). (2008). Asia’s new regionalism and global role: Agenda for the East Asia Summit. New Delhi and Singapore: RIS and Institute for Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, A. (2004). Asian integration needs and overarching framework. New Asia Monitor, 1(1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2007). Asian immensities. Keynote Address in Commemoration of the 60th Anniversary of UNESCAP. Bangkok. 28 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V. (2004). Towards an Asian economic community: Exploring the past. In N. Kumar (Ed.), Towards an Asian economic community: Vision of a new Asia (pp. 13–40). New Delhi and Singapore: RIS and ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2004). Speech at the ASEAN–India business Summit, New Delhi. October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuli, V. (2008). Regional cooperation for Asian energy security. In N. Kumar, K. Kesavapany, & C. Yao (Eds.), Asia’s new regionalism and global role: Agenda for the East Asia Summit (pp. 247–260). New Delhi and Singapore: RIS and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050. Goldman Sachs. Global Economic Papers No.99. http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/brics/book/99-dreaming.pdf.

  • Wolf, M. (2004). Asia needs the freedom of its monetary fund. Financial Times. 19 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (WEF) (2003). Press Release. 18 June.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nagesh Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Asian Development Bank Institute

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumar, N. (2014). Toward an Asian Economic Community?. In: Capannelli, G., Kawai, M. (eds) The Political Economy of Asian Regionalism. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54568-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics