Skip to main content

Screening Cataract Surgery Candidates with Corneal Topographer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

We investigated the characteristics of corneal higher-order aberrations in patients with simple cataract. Corneal topographic analysis was retrospectively reviewed in 149 consecutive eyes before simple cataract surgery. The corneal total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) for a 4-mm diameter, difference between central corneal power and simulated K readings (ΔK), corneal spherical aberration for a 6-mm diameter (Z40), and corneal cylinder were measured. Reliable topographic measurements for a 6-mm diameter were obtained for 78 % of eyes. In such reliable measurements, the mean ± standard deviation total HOA was 0.162 ± 0.067 μm; in 5 % of eyes the total HOAs exceeded 0.3 μm. In 3 % of eyes, the ΔK (mean, 0.16 ± 0.17 diopter [D]) exceeded 0.5 D. In 11 % of eyes, the Z40 (mean, 0.247 ± 0.135 μm) was below 0.1 μm. In 18 % of eyes, the cylinder (mean, 1.04 ± 0.8 D) exceeded 1.5 D. Our results suggested that eyes with clinically significant irregular astigmatism, spherical aberration, or regular astigmatism were included even in simple cataract candidates in addition to the existence of eyes where reliable evaluation of corneal topography was not possible. Assessing corneal topography preoperatively may aid in the selection of new technology IOLs to avoid potential problems in eyes with suboptimal optics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1997–2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohnen T. Incision sizes with 5.5 mm total optic, 3-piece foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1765–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Feasibility of ultrasound cataract surgery with a 1.4 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:934–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Ortiz D, Montalbán R. Clinical outcomes and postoperative intraocular optical quality with a microincision aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1548–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1789–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P. Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:297–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:683–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Olson RJ, Werner L, Mamalis N, Cionni R. New intraocular lens technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(4):709–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deitz MR, Sanders DR, Raanan MG. Progressive hyperopia in radial keratotomy. Long-term follow-up of diamond-knife and metal-blade series. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:1284–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes after refractive keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1995;11:490–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalski RS, Danjoux JP, Fraenkel GE, Lawless MA, Rogers C. Intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. J Refract Surg. 1997;13:362–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:349–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbero S, Marcos S, Jiménez-Alfaro I. Optical aberrations of intraocular lenses measured in vivo and in vitro. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003;20:1841–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohtani S, Miyata K, Samejima T, Honbou M, Oshika T. Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:896–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kasper T, Bühren J, Kohnen T. Intraindividual comparison of higher-order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses as a function of pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beiko GH. Personalized correction of spherical aberration in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1455–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Koch DD. Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson W, Poirier L, Coulon P, Verin P. Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity). Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:249–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Celikkol L, Ahn D, Celikkol G, Feldman ST. Calculating intraocular lens power in eyes with keratoconus using videokeratography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:497–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A. Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:172–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ravalico G, Parentin F, Baccara F. Effect of astigmatism on multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:804–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2080–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson SE, Klyce SD. Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography. A clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:349–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, McDonald MB. Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia. Cornea. 1997;16:517–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by Grant-in-Aid No. 24592669 (to Dr. Maeda) for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Dr Maeda receives a research grant from the Topcon Corporation. Dr. Ito has no financial or proprietary interest in any materials or methods mentioned.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoyuki Maeda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maeda, N., Ito, M. (2014). Screening Cataract Surgery Candidates with Corneal Topographer. In: Bissen-Miyajima, H., Koch, D., Weikert, M. (eds) Cataract Surgery: Maximizing Outcomes Through Research. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54538-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54538-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54537-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54538-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics