Skip to main content

Oncology Information System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A system that can manage patient treatment schedules, treatment plans, treatment delivery, treatment summaries, and results is inevitable. An oncology information system (OIS) can be used to manage these data. This OIS will encompass the information exchange between radiation therapy departments and the overall healthcare enterprise. Particle therapy departments utilize many information systems. For medical safety purposes, patient demographic information and treatment data should be shared among these systems. The OIS must be connected with other hospital information systems (HISs, e.g., electronic medical records). All HISs should share radiation treatment information. This information may be transmitted transparently by each device. Evaluating and improving the quality of radiation therapy requires complete information on cancer stage and treatment results. Hospital-based registries are a key tool. The development of information systems requires standardization for rapid development and ease of integration. Standardization also facilitates preparation and reduces the test time. For standardization there are some standards (such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiotherapy (DICOM-RT) and Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE)). By using these standards we can easily share the patient data. And this interoperability will lead to improved medical safety and professional effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Urda D, Ribelles N, Subirats JL, Franco L, Alba E, Jerez JM. Addressing critical issues in the development Of an oncology information system. Int J Med Inform. 2012;S1386-5056(12):00152–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu P, Gandhidasan S, Miller AA. Different usage of the same oncology information system in two hospitals in Sydney–lessons go beyond the initial introduction. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):422–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Apr 3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamada T, Ikeda M, Murao T, Yanagawa S, Ishigaki T, Ishiguchi T. Image storing system for radiation therapy (radiation oncology information system: ROIS) as a branch of diagnostic PACS; implementation and evaluation. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1999;23(2):111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson M. HL7 Messaging Second Edition, OTech Inc, 2007. http://www.hl7.org/.

  5. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 6. DICOM Supplement 96: Unified worklist and procedure step. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup96_ft.pdf.

  6. Belletti D, Zacker C, Mullins CD. Perspectives on electronic medical records adoption: electronic medical records (EMR) in outcomes research. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2010;1:29–37. Epub 2010 Apr 30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grams R. The “New” America Electronic Medical Record (EMR)-design criteria and challenge. J Med Syst. 2009;33(6):409–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho I, Kim J, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim Y. Design and implementation of a standards-based interoperable clinical decision support architecture in the context of the Korean EHR. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(9):611–22. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Zhang K, Yang Y, Sun J, Ling T, Wang G, Ling Y, Peng D. Grid-based implementation of XDS-I as part of image-enabled EHR for regional healthcare in Shanghai. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011;6(2):273–84. doi:10.1007/s11548-010-0522-8. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaelber D, Pan EC. The value of personal health record (PHR) systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008;6:343–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):515–22. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallin K, Palis BE, Watroba N. Completeness of american cancer registry treatment data: implications for quality of care research. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):428–37. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. German RR, Wike JM, Bauer KR. Quality of cancer registry data: findings from CDC-NPCR’s breast and prostate cancer data quality and patterns of care study. J Registry Manag. 2011;38(2):75–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palta JR, Efstathiou JA, Justin EB. Developing a national radiation oncology registry: from acorns to oaks. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012;2(1):10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology(JASTRO). http://www.jastro.or.jp/.

  16. Bidgood Jr WD, Horii SC, Prior FW, Van Syckle DE. Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):199–212. Review.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oosterwijk H. DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11(3 Suppl 1):39–41. Review.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DICOM Radiotherapy Information Objects Supplement 11. ftp://medical.nema.org/MEDICAL/Dicom/Final/sup11_ft.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Law MY, Liu B, Chan LW. Informatics in radiology: DICOM-RT-based electronic patient record information system for radiation therapy. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):961–72. doi:10.1148/rg.294085073. Epub 2009 May 15. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 7. DICOM Radiotherapy Extensions for Ion Therapy Supplement 102. ftp://medical.nema.org/MEDICAL/Dicom/Final/sup102_ft.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cavanaugh BJ, Garland HT, Hayes BL. Upgrading legacy systems for the Integrating The Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) initiative. J Digit Imaging. 2000;13 Suppl 1:180–2. doi:10.1007/BF03167655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE. http://www.ihe.net/.

  23. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, IHE Radiation Oncology, Technical Framework Vol 1 (RO TF-1), Revision 1.7, http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_RO_TF_Rev1-7_Vol1_2011-0509.pdf.

  24. JASTRO, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. Enterprise Schedule Integration ESI, http://www.ihe-j.org/file2/comments/IHE-J_RO_TF_Volume_1_Supplement_for_Enterprise_Schedule_Integration_v0.1b.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yutaka Ando .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ando, Y. (2014). Oncology Information System. In: Tsujii, H., Kamada, T., Shirai, T., Noda, K., Tsuji, H., Karasawa, K. (eds) Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54457-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54457-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54456-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54457-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics