Aerodynamics and Flight Stability of Bio-inspired, Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicles

  • Hao Liu
  • Xiaolan Wang
  • Toshiyuki Nakata
  • Kazuyuki Yoshida
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 65)

Abstract

In this chapter, we present an integrated study of flexible wing aerodynamics and passive dynamic flight stability of a prototype bio-inspired, flapping-wing micro air vehicle (MAV) by a combination of flexible wing kinematics and force measurements and computational approaches. The MAV is weighted 2.4–3.0 g, equipped with an X-type wing and a wingspan of 12–15 cm. A bio-inspired, dynamic flight simulator is utilized to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of the flexible wing MAV. This simulator, by integrating the modeling of realistic wing-body morphology and realistic flapping-wing and body kinematics, is capable to provide an evaluation of the MAV’s unsteady aerodynamics in terms of vortex and wake structures and their relationship with aerodynamic force generation.

Keywords

Flapping Micro air vehicle Flexible wing aerodynamics Flight stability Computational fluid dynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Shyy W, Liang Y, Tang J, Viieru D, Liu H (2007) Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number flyers. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Trizila P, Kang C-K, Cesnik CES, Liu H (2010) Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 46:284–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mueller TJ (ed) (2001) Fixed and flapping wing aerodynamics for micro air vehicle applications. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut, vol 195. AIAA, RestonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pines DJ, Bohorquez F (2006) Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. J Aircr 43:290–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Platzer M, Jones K, Young J, Lai J (2008) Flapping wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges. AIAA J 46:2136–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stanford B, Ifju P, Albertani R, Shyy W (2008) Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: experimental characterization, numerical modeling, and tailoring. Prog Aerosp Sci 44:258–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu H (section editor) (2010) In: Blockrey R, Shyy W (ed) Micro air vehicles, encyclopedia of aerospace engineering. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wootton RJ (1981) Support and deformability in insect wings. J Zool 193:447–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Young J, Walker SM, Bomphrey RJ, Taylor GK, Thomas ALR (2009) Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science 325:1549–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mountcastle AM, Daniel TL (2009) Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance. Exp Fluids 46:873–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakata T, Liu H (2011) Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach. Proc R Soc B 279(1729):722–731. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nanaka T, Liu H, Tanaka Y, Nishihashi N, Wang X, Sato A (2011) Flexible wings aerodynamics of a bio-inspired flapping micro air vehicle. Bioinspir Biomim 6:045002. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/045002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakata T, Liu H (2011) A fluid–structure interaction model of insect flight with flexible wings. J Comput Phys 231(4):1822–1847. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.11.005MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weis-Fogh T (1973) Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J Exp Biol 59:169–230Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aono H, Liang F, Liu H (2008) Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study. J Exp Biol 211:239–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu H (2009) Integrated modelling of insect flight: from morphology, kinematics to aerodynamics. J Comput Phys 228:439–459MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu H, Aono H (2009) Size effects on insect hovering aerodynamics: an integrated computational study. Bioinspir Biomim 4:015002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maeda M, Gao N, Nishihashi N, Liu H (2010) A free-flight simulation of insect flapping flight. J Aero Aqua Biomech 1:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao N, Liu H (2010) A numerical analysis of dynamic flight stability of hawkmoth hovering passive dynamic stability of a hovering fruitfly: a comparison between linear and nonlinear methods. J Biomech Sci Eng 5:591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gao N, Aono H, Liu H (2009) A numerical analysis of dynamic flight stability of hawkmoth hovering. J Biomech Sci Eng 4(1):105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gao N, Aono H, Liu H (2010) Perturbation analysis of 6DoF flight dynamics and passive dynamic stability of hovering fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. J Theor Biol 270(1):98–111. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi. 2010.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaolan Wang
    • 3
  • Toshiyuki Nakata
    • 4
  • Kazuyuki Yoshida
    • 5
  1. 1.Chiba UniversityChibaJapan
  2. 2.Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Chiba University International Cooperative Research Center (SJTU-CU ICRC)ShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Sharp, LtdTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of ZoologyThe University of OxfordOxfordUK
  5. 5.Fiber Optics Components & System DivisionFujikura LtdChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations