EUS-FNA for Submucosal Tumor

Abstract

At present, EUS-FNA is a reliable technique for obtaining tissue samples of the sub-mucosal tumor with minimal risks. A large group of submucosal lesions such as lipomas (hyperechoic mass), cysts (anechoic mass), and submucosal varices has typical features that allow accurate diagnosis based solely on the data gathered from endoscopy and EUS imaging [1–4]. However, an important subset of submucosal lesions such as GISTs, leiomyoma, neurinoma, carcinoid tumors, ectopic pancreas, lymphoid mass tissues, SMT-like cancers, and metastases may have overlapping echo (hypoechoic solid mass) and endoscopic features and cannot be accurately determined without a biopsy sample. Therefore, EUS-FNA should be performed for all hypoechoic solid tumors imaged by EUS (Fig. 17.1) [2].

Keywords

Carcinoid Tumor Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Malt Lymphoma Submucosal Tumor Submucosal Lesion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akahoshi K, Harada N, Nawata H (2003) The current state of endoscopic ultrasonography. In: Pandalai SG (ed) Recent research developments in radiology. Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akahoshi K, Matsui N, Sumida Y et al (2009) Diagnosis of the gastric submucosal tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration. Endoscopia Digestiva 21:1709–1717 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akahoshi K, Oya M (2010) Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: how to manage? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2:271–277PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui N et al (2007) Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 14:2077–2082Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sawaki A, Mizuno N, Takahashi K et al (2006) Long-term follow up of patients with small gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach using endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Dig Endosc 18:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y et al (2002) The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 55:37–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Okubo K, Yamao K, Nakamura T et al (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach. J Gastroenterol 39:747–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chatzipantelis P, Salla C, Karoumpalis I et al (2008) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. A study of 17 cases. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 17:15–20Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsui N, Akahoshi K, Motomura Y et al (2010) Successful endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pelvic lesion through the sigmoid colon. Dig Endosc 22:337–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu PC, Langerman A, Ryan CW et al (2003) Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib (STI-571) era. Surgery 134:656–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akahoshi K (2009) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the stomach. In: Tajiri H, Oyama T (eds) Knack and pitfall of gastrointestinal endoscopy in diagnosis of esophageal, gastricand duodenal diseases. Yodosya, Tokyo, pp 149–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyAso Iizuka HospitalIizuka city, FukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of PathologyAso Iizuka HospitalIizuka city, FukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations