Abstract
The concept of walkability conveys how conducive the built environment is to walking. It has been adopted in many parts of the world to predict people’s physical activity and mode of transportation (Frank and Engelke 2005; Owen et al. 2004; Sallis et al. 2004). Walkability captures the proximity between functionally complementary land uses (live, work, and play) and the directness of a route or the connectivity between destinations (Forsyth and Southworth 2008; Moudon et al. 2006). A walk score is an indicator of how “friendly” an area is for walking. This score is related to the benefits to society in terms of energy savings and improvements in health that a particular environment offers to its residents. For example, a recently developed walk score web site uses Google Maps, specifically Google’s local search application programming interface (API), to find stores, restaurants, bars, parks, and other amenities within walking distance of any address entered. The walk score currently includes addresses in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The algorithm behind this score indicates the walkability of a given route based on the fixed distance from one’s home to nearby amenities. The number of amenities found nearby is the leading predictor of whether people will walk rather than take another travel mode. However, evaluating walkability is challenging because it requires the consideration of many subjective factors (Reid 2008). Moreover, all technical disciplines related to walkability have their own terminology and jargon (Abley 2005).
Keywords
- Geographical Information System
- Green Space
- Search Radius
- Greenness Score
- Advanced Land Observe Satellite
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This chapter has been improved from “Ko Ko Lwin and Yuji Murayama (2011), Modelling of urban green space walkability: eco-friendly walk score calculator. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(5), 408–420.” Copyright (2011), with permission from Elsevier.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abley S (2005) Walkability scoping paper. Charted Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Christchurch
Bell S, Tyrvainen L, Sievanen T, Proebstl U, Simpson M (2007) Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: a European perspective. Living Rev Landsc Res 1:2
Bhat C, Handy S, Kockelman K, Mahmassani H, Gopal A, Srour I, Weston L (2002) Development of an urban accessibility index: formulations, aggregation, and application. Report No. FHWA/TX-02-4938-4. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin
Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T, Dawes LA (2009) Sustainable urban futures: an ecological approach to sustainable urban development. In: Proceedings of the second infrastructure theme postgraduate conference 2009: rethinking sustainable development planning, infrastructure engineering, design and managing urban infrastructure, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
Forsyth A, Southworth M (2008) Cities afoot: pedestrians, walkability, and urban design. J Urban Des 13:1–3
Frank LD, Engelke P (2005) Multiple impacts of the built environment on public health: walkable places and the exposure to air pollution. Int Reg Sci Rev 28:193–216
Ghaemi P, Swift J, Sister C, Wilson JP, Wolch J (2009) Design and implementation of a web-based platform to support interactive environmental planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:482–491
Grahn P, Stigsdotter UA (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban For Urban Green 2:1–18
Handy S, Niermeier DA (1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ Plann A 29:1175–1194
Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jiang B (1999) SimPed: simulating pedestrian crowds in a virtual environment. J Geogr Inform Decis Anal 3:21–30
Kweon B-S, Sullivan WC, Wiley AR (1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner city older adults. Environ Behav 30:832–858
Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Hugo G (2007) Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health Place 13:111–122
Levinson DM, Krizek KJ (2005) Access to destinations. Elsevier, Kidlington
Lwin KK, Murayama Y (2009) A GIS approach to estimation of building population for micro-spatial analysis. Trans GIS 13:401–414
Lwin KK, Murayama Y (2010) Development of a GIS tool for dasymetric mapping. Int J Geoinform 6:11–18
Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Comm Health 60:587–592
Mahon JR, Miller RW (2003) Identifying high-value green space prior to land development. J Arboricult 29:25–33
Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin CW, Johnson DB, Schmid TL et al (2006) Operational definitions of a walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights. J Phys Act Health 3:S99–S117
Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin C, Johnson DB, Schmid TL et al (2007) Attributes of environments supporting walking. Am J Health Promot 21:448–459
O’Sullivan D, Morrison A, Shearer J (2000) Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 14:85–104
Okabe A, Okunuki K (2001) A computational method for estimating the demand of retail stores on a street network and its implementation in GIS. Trans GIS 5:209–220
Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 27:67–76
Peponis J, Zimring C, Choi YK (1990) Finding the building in way-finding. Environ Behav 22:555–590
Pirie GH (1979) Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environ Plann A 11:299–312
Pretty J, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South N, Griffin M (2007) Green exercise in the UK countryside: effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. J Environ Plann Manag 50:211–231
Randall TA, Churchill CJ, Baetz BW (2003) A GIS-based decision support system for neighbourhood greening. Environ Plann B 30:541–563
Reid S (2008) Fit for purpose: evaluating walkability. Eng Sustain 161:105–112
Roehr D, Laurenz J (2008) Green surfaces in the city context. In: Proceeding of ecocity world summit, San Francisco
Sallis JF, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Kraft MK (2004) Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transport Res Pol Pract 38:249–268
Sherman L, Barbara B, Kondo W (1974) Method for evaluating metropolitan accessibility. Transport Res Rec 499:70–82
Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N (2008) Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J Epidemiol Comm Health 62:e9
Thill J-C (2000) Geographic information systems for transportation in perspective. Transport Res C Emerg Tech 8:3–12
Thill J-C (2009) Transportation applications of geographic information systems, manual of geographic information systems. In: Madden M (ed) Manual of geographic information systems. ASPRS, Washington, pp 1035–1049
Thill J-C, Kim M (2005) Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility. J Geogr Syst 7:229–248
Wachs M, Kumagi TG (1973) Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Soc Econ Plann Sci 7:437–456
Wolch J, Wilson JP, Fehrenbach J (2005) Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: an equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geogr 26:4–35
Zhang L, Wang H (2006) Planning an ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis. Landsc Urban Plann 78:449–456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lwin, K.K., Murayama, Y. (2012). Web-Based Interactive Walkability Measurement Using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems. In: Murayama, Y. (eds) Progress in Geospatial Analysis. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54000-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54000-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-53999-5
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54000-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)