Skip to main content
  • 2349 Accesses

Abstract

Labor market institutions play an essential role in determining the distribution of bargaining power between employers and employees. In turn, the allocation of bargaining power affects, among other things, the success of labor negotiations and thereby the level of unemployment, the power of incentive schemes in labor contracts and the associated efficiency of the latter. Different institutions may shape these outcomes differently. For example, social security laws directly influence the threat point of workers. In contrast, employment laws (regulating dismissal procedures and employment conditions) and collective relation laws (co-determination and conflict resolution mechanisms) may directly affect the worker’s ability to extract a fraction of the quasi-rent. This paper attempts to compare the efficiency effect of different institutional arrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bental, B.; Demougin D. (2006): Incentive Contracts and Total Factor Productivity, International Economic Review 47(3), pp. 1021–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K.; Rubinstein, A.; Wolinsky A. (1986): The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling, RAND Journal of Economics 17(2), pp. 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (1997): The Medium Run, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp. 89–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (2006): European Unemployment: The Evolution of Facts and Ideas, Economic Policy 21, pp. 5–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demougin, D.; Fluet, C. (2001): Monitoring versus incentives, European Economic Review 45, pp. 1741–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demougin, D.; Helm, C. (2006): Moral Hazard and Bargaining Power, German Economic Review 7(4), pp. 463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.K. (1997): Limited Liability and Bonus Contracts, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6, pp. 899–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (1981): Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications, Bell Journal of Economics 12, pp. 380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthoo, A. (1999): Bargaining Theory with Application, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, F. (1953): Two Person Cooperative Games, Econometrica, 21, pp. 128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999): Employment Outlook 1999, Paris, OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Pissarides, C. A. (2000): Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, The MIT press, 2nd edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1982): Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica 50, pp. 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (2003): The New legal competition, Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Eger Jochen Bigus Claus Ott Georg von Wangenheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demougin, D. (2008). Labor Market Institutions and Efficiency. In: Eger, T., Bigus, J., Ott, C., von Wangenheim, G. (eds) Internationalisierung des Rechts und seine ökonomische Analyse. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5582-7_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics