Skip to main content

Auszug

Kognitive Trägheit beschreibt die Unfähigkeit von Top- Managern, auf Veränderungen der Unternehmensumwelt durch eine entsprechende Anpassung und Aktualisierung ihrer strategischen Schemata zu reagieren (Hodgkinson 1997; Hodgkinson/Wright 2002; Reger/Palmer 1996). Empirische Forschungsergebnisse zeigen, dass kognitive Trägheit organisationales Handeln verzögern und zu geringerer organisationaler Leistung führen kann (Barr 1998; Barr/Huff 1997; Barr/Stimpert/Huff 1992; Sull 1999; Tripsas/Gavetti 2000). Diese Studien belegen zwar die Auswirkungen kognitiver Trägheit, bieten jedoch wenig Einblick in die Prozesse und Determinanten, die zu kognitiver Trägheit führen, d. h. warum und unter welchen Umständen Top Manager nicht in der Lage sind, ihre strategischen Schemata an die sich verändernde Umwelt anzupassen. Darüber hinaus offerieren sie kaum Empfehlungen, mit welchen Fähigkeiten und Methoden Top-Manager kognitiver Trägheit vorbeugen oder sie überwinden können.

Überarbeitete und erweiterte Zusammenfassung des Beitrags „Using reflective sensemaking to prevent cognitive inertia“, der im 3. Band des Jahrbuchs „Strategisches Kompetenz-Management“ 2008/09 erscheint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Barr, P. S./ Stimpert, J. L./ Huff, A. S. (1992): Cognitive Change, Strategic Action, and Organizational Renewal. In: Strategic Management Journal, 13: 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, P. S./ Huff, A. S. (1997): Seeing isn’t believing: Understanding diversity in the timing of strategic response. In: Journal of Management Studies, 34: 337–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, P. S. (1998): Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. In: Organization Science, 9: 644–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, W. C./ Barr, P. S. (2000): Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. In: Organization Science, 11: 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, G./ van der Heijden, K. (2003): First steps: towards purposeful activities in scenario thinking and future studies. In: Futures, 35: 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. S. (1999): The effectiveness of collective retrospection as a mechanism of organizational learning. In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35: 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S./ Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999): Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, P./ Glick, W. H./ Miller, C. C./ Huber, G. P. (1999). Determinants of executive beliefs: Comparing functional conditioning and social influence. In: Strategic Management Journal, 20: 763–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J./ Fiske, S. T./ Taylor, S. E. (1984): Schematic Bases of Belief Change. In R. J. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal Judgement: 197–226. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L./ Weick, K. E. (1984): Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, 9: 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C./ Ackermann, F./ Cropper, S. (1992): The Analysis of Cause Maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S./ Davidi, I. (2005) After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 857–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T./ Taylor, S. E. (1991): Social Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinyer, P. H. (2000): A cognitive approach to group strategic decision taking: a discussion of evolved practice in the light of received research results. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51: 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C./ Mason, P. A. (1984): Upper Echelons-the Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P./ Johnson, G. (1994): Exploring the Mental Models of Competitive Strategists-the Case for a Processual Approach. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 525–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P. (1997): Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The case of UK residential estate agents. Journal of Management Studies, 34: 921–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P./ Wright, G. (2002): Confronting Strategic Inertia in a Top Management Team: Learning from Failure. Organization Studies, 23: 949–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P./ Whittington, R./ Johnson, G./ Schwarz, M. (2006): The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: Formality, communication, coordination and inclusion. Long Range Planning, 39: 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S./ Sproull, L. (1982): Managerial Response to Changing Environments-Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 548–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski, R./ Mohammed, S. (1994): Team mental model: construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20: 403–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T. K./ Milliken, F. J./ Batra, B. (1992): The Role of Managerial Learning and Interpretation in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation-an Empirical Exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, M. R./ Sutton, R. I. (1991): Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking. Human Relations, 44: 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M. A./ Schwenk, C. R. (1992): Top Management, Strategy and Organizational Knowledge Structures. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezias, J. M./ Grinyer, P./ Guth, W. D. (2001): Changing collective cognition: A process model for strategic change. Long Range Planning, 34: 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, S./ Narayanan, V. K. (2007): Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, P. C./ Starbuck, W. H. (1984): To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12: 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K./ Bettis, R. A. (1986): The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7: 485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R. K./ Palmer, T. B. (1996): Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organization Science, 7: 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1995): Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36: 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H./ Milliken, F. J. (1988): Executives perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers: 35–65. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sull, D. N. (1999) The dynamics of standing still: Firestone Tire/Rubber and the radial revolution. Business History Review, 73: 430–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K. M./ Huber, G. P. (1998): Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 793–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E./ Crocker, J. (1981): Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins/ C. P. Herman/ M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition. The Ontario Symposium: 89–134. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. B./ Clark, S. M./ Gioia, D. A. (1993): Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance-Linkages among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M./ Gavetti, G. (2000): Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, K. (1996): Scenarios. The art of strategic conversation. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashdi, D. R./ Bamberger, P. A./ Erez M./ Weiss-Meilik, A. (2007): Briefing-debriefing: Using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. Human Resource Management, 46: 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition. Organization Science, 6: 280–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alexander Eisenkopf Christian Opitz Heike Proff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frost, J., Westermayer, T. (2008). Reflexives Sensemaking zur Überwindung kognitiver Trägheit (Abstract). In: Eisenkopf, A., Opitz, C., Proff, H. (eds) Strategisches Kompetenz-Management in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5570-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics