Skip to main content

Economics with Ethical Preferences

  • Chapter

Abstract

Classical and neoclassical economics regard all men as egoists who are only interested in their own well-being. Nev ertheless, these egoists are trustworthy, stand to contracts and obey the law. Nowadays, modern economics models people as opportunists who are sel fish without any constraints. Opportunists would lie or even commit crimes, as long as they gain personally from doing so, even if only marginally. Agency theory analyses and designs constraints, in order to induce opportunists to behave as well as possible. However, these outer restrictions on egoistic preferences with no inner limitations seem too narrow. As well as economists are not interested in the content of egoistical preferences, they should not limit the autonomy of individuals to egoistic ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8350-5565-0_3
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-8350-5565-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G.A.: The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 1970, pp. 488–500.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.; Debreu, G.: The Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. In: Econometrica 22(3), 1954, pp. 265–290.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S.: A Theory of Social Interactions. In: Journal of Political Economy 82(6), 1974, pp. 1063–1091.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S.: The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H.: The Nature of the Firm. In: Economica 4(16), 1937, pp. 386–405.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H.: The Problem of Social Cost. In: Journal of Law and Economics 3(1), 1960, pp. 1–44.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New York: Wiley 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E.; Gächter, S.: Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 2000, pp. 159–181.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S.: How Intrinsic Motivation Is Crowded Out and In. In: Rationality and Society 6(3), 1994, pp. 334–352.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S.; Oberholzer-Gee, F.: The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. In: American Economic Review 87(4), 1997, pp. 746–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B.R.: Moral Hazard and Observability. In: Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 1979, pp. 74–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, Vol. III: Of Morals. London: T. Longman 1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. London: A. Millar 1751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives. In: American Economic Review 87(2), 1997, pp. 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.; Milgrom, P.; Roberts, J.; Wilson, R.: Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma. In: Journal of Economic Theory 27(2), 1982, pp. 245–252.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.; Wilson, R.: Sequential Equilibria. In: Econometrica 50(4), 1982, pp. 863–894.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer 1935; 1959 first English edition: Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.J.: The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. In: American Economic Review 63(2), Papers and Proceedings, 1973, pp. 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Two Volumes. London and Edinburgh: A. Millar, A. Kincaid and J. Bell 1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Two Volumes. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell 1776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A.M.: Job Market Signaling. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3), 1973, pp. 355–374.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: Incentives and Risk Sharing in Sharecropping. In: Review of Economic Studies 41(2), 1974, pp. 219–255.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: The Theory of “Screening”, Education, and the Distribution of Income. In: American Economic Review 65(3), 1975 pp. 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.: Calculativeness, Trust and Economic Organization. In: Journal of Law and Economics 36(1), 1993, pp. 453–486.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr.Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dilger, A. (2008). Economics with Ethical Preferences. In: Scherer, A.G., Patzer, M. (eds) Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Unternehmensethik. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5565-0_3

Download citation