Skip to main content

Innovation, Leadership, Wachstum und Profitabilität in KMUs

  • Chapter
Book cover Entrepreneurial Leadership
  • 4107 Accesses

Auszug

Aufgrund ständiger Veränderung der Unternehmensumwelt sind auch kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen (KMU) gefordert, sich dieser anzupassen und ihre Geschäftsmodelle sowie —systeme kontinuierlich zu adaptieren. Um einen Wettbewerbsvorteil zu erzielen, sind Flexibilität sowie die Bereitschaft, Ziele, Strategien und Führungsstile zu hinterfragen und neu zu definieren, notwendig. Unternehmen sind gezwungen, neue Möglichkeiten in Form von neuen Produkten, Prozessen und Geschäftskonzepten zu identifizieren, zu fördern und umzusetzen (vgl. Lumpkin/Dess 1996, Bart 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverweise

  • Ansoff, H.I. (1979): Strategic Management. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991): Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, In: Journal of Management 17, S. 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C. (2004): Innovation, mission statements and learning. In: International Journal of Technology Management 27, S. 544–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolwijn, P.T./ Kumpe, T. (1990): Manufacturing in the 1990s-Productivity, Flexibility and Innovation. In: Long Range Planning 23, S. 44–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossink, B. (2004). Effectiveness of innovation leadership styles: a manager’s influence on ecological innovation in construction projects. In: Construction Innovation 4. S. 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R.J./ Cavusgil, St./ Yushan, Z. (2002): Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. In: Industrial Marketing Management 31, S. 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H.-J./ Pucik, V. (2005): Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal 26, S. 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozijnsen, A.J./ Vrakking, W.J./ Ijzerloo, M.V. (2000): Success and failure of 50 innovation project in Dutch companies. In: European Journal of Innovation Management 3, S. 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E./ Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2001): Product innovativeness from the firm’s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18, S. 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G./ Arvonen, J. (1994): Leadership Profiles, Situations and Effectiveness. Creativity and Innovation Management 3, S. 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C./ Larcker, D.F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. In: Journal of Marketing Research 18, S. 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goosen, C.J./ de Coning T.J./ Smit, EvdM. (2003): Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: The role of management. In: South African Journal of Business Management 33, S. 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000): Unraveling the Links between Dimensions of Innovation and Organizational Performance. In: The Journal of High Technology Management Research 11, S. 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1991): The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. In: California Management Review 33, S. 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimanolis, A. (2000): A Resource-based View of Innovativeness in Small Firms. In: Technology Analysis&Strategic Management 12, S. 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F./ Anderson, R.E./ Tatham R.L. (1998): Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th Ed. 5. New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G./ Prahalad, C.K. (2002): Competing for the future. Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J. (2004): Innovationsmanagement. 3. Aufl. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H.H. (2003): Leadership. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H.H./ Friedrich, S.A. (2002): The technology dimension of strategic leadership: The leadership challenge for production economists. In: International Journal of Production Economics 77, S. 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H.H./ Krauthammer, E. (2005): Leadership —mehr als Management: Was Führungskräfte nicht delegieren dürfen. 4. Aufl. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H.H./ Rothenberger, S. (2004): Eine Leadership Company entwickeln —Leadership auf allen Verantwortungsebenen als Kernkompetenz des Unternehmens der Zukunft. Information Managment &Consulting 19, S. 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H.H./ Stadler, Ch. (2005): Leadership und Strategie als intangible Assets. In: Matzler, K. (Hrsg.). Immaterielle Vermögenswerte: Handbuch der intangiblen Assets. Berlin, S. 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J./ Singh, J.V. (1987): Organizational Behaviour: Some New Directions for I/O Psychology. In: Annual Review of Psychology 38, S. 669–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J./ Spangler, W.D./ Woycke, J. (1991): Personality and Charisma in the U.S. Presidency: A Psychological Theory of Leader Effectiveness. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 36, S. 364–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J.M./ Higgins, C.A. (1990): Champions of Technological Innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 35, S. 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G.T.M./ Hurley, R.F./ Knight, G.A. (2004): Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. In: Industrial Marketing Management 33, S. 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, P.W./ Beckett, R.C. (2004): Innovation and enhancement of enterprise capabilities. In: International Journal of Technology Management &Sustainable Development 3, S. 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskyte, K. (2004): Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. In: Nonprofit Management &Leadership 15, S. 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G.T./ Dess, G.G. (1996): Clarifying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review 21, S. 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, E.F. (2000): An Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Teams. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management 17, S. 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, E.F./ Leifer, R.P. (1986): Effective Control of New Product Projects: The Interaction of Organization Culture and Project Leadership. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management 3, S. 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollila S. (2000): Creativity and Innovativeness through Reflective Project Leadership. In: Creativity &Innovation Management 9, S. 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T. (1995): The theory of the growth of the firm. 3rd Ed. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S./ Kleinschmidt, E.J./ Brentani de, U. (2005): Unternehmenskultur und Top Management commitment in der Neuproduktentwicklung f ür internationale M ärkte. In: Die Unternehmung 59, S. 237–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, I.L./ Sandvik, K. (2003): The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing 20, S. 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H. (1987): Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, R./ Smith, D.C./ Park, C.W. (2001): Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products. In: Journal of Marketing Research 38, S. 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E./ Carson, K.P./ Alexander, R.A. (1984): Leadership: It Can Make a Difference. In: Academy of Management Journal 127, S. 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M./ Noh J. (2006): Best new product development and management practices in the Korean high-tech industry. In: Industrial Marketing Management 35, S. 262–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, J.I./ Looise, J.C./ Fischer, O.A.M./ de Jong, R.D. (2001): Leadership and innovation: relations between leadership, individual characteristics and the functioning of R &D teams. In: International Journal of Human Resource Management 12, S. 1141–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Margit Raich Harald Pechlaner Hans H. Hinterhuber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matzler, K., Schwarz, E., Kotzent, U., Deutinger, N. (2007). Innovation, Leadership, Wachstum und Profitabilität in KMUs. In: Raich, M., Pechlaner, H., Hinterhuber, H.H. (eds) Entrepreneurial Leadership. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5475-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics