Skip to main content

Bedeutung der Markenpersönlichkeit

  • Chapter
  • 1533 Accesses

Auszug

Die Markierung von Produkten ist ein entscheidender Erfolgsfaktor, welcher seit der Erfindung der Schrift zur Differenzierung genutzt wird. So finden sich bereits auf summerischen Bildschrifttafeln, minoischen Siegeln sowie ägyptischen, griechischen und römischen Tonkrügen Angaben zum Hersteller als Herkunftsnachweis. Seither haben sich jedoch Verständnis und Zweck der Markierung aufgrund geänderter Rahmenbedingungen vom bloßen Vorgang der Eigentums-bzw. Herkunftskennzeichnung zu einem umfassenden Markenmanagement gewandelt.1

1 Vgl. Bauer/Huber (1997), S. 2; Meffert/Burmann (2002b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

o

  • Bauer, Hans H. / Huber, Frank (1997): Der Wert der Marke, Arbeitspapier M31, Institut für Marktorientierte Unternehmensführung, Universität Mannheim., S. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph (2002b): Wandel in der Markenführung: Vom Instrumentellen zum Identitätsorientierten Markenverständnis, in: Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph / Koers, Martin (Hrsg.): Markenmanagement: Grundfragen der identitätsorientierten Markenführung, Wiesbaden, S. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobni, Dawn / Zinkhan, George M. (1990): In Search of Brand Image: A Foundation Analysis, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 1, S. 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Kevin Lane (2003b): Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Upper Saddle River., S. 3ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph / Koers, Martin (2002): Stellenwert und Gegenstand des Markenmanagement, in: Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph / Koers, Martin (Hrsg.): Markenmanagement: Grundfragen der identitätsorientierten Markenführung, Wiesbaden, S. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hieronimus, Fabian (2003): Persönlichkeitsorientiertes Markenmanagement: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Messung, Wahrnehmung und Wirkung der Markenpersönlichkeit, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Richard (1980): How Advertising Works: A Planning Model, in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 20, No. 5, S. 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford, Brian T. (1987): New Insights about the FCB Grid, in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, S. 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmidt, Maik / Donnevert, Tobias / Bauer, Hans H. (2008): Brand Efficiency and Brand Relevance? Introducing and Linking both Concepts, in: AMA Winter Educators Conference Proceedings, Austin, Vol. 20, S. 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vershofen, Wilhelm (1940): Handbuch der Verbrauchsforschung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, Abraham H. (1943): A Theory of Human Motivation, in: Psychological Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, S. 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBDO Group Germany / Bauer, Hans H. (2001): Brand Equity Excellence: Brand Equity Review, Band 1, Düsseldorf., S. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, Susan M. (1998): Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, S. 344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, Sibylle I. (2001): Kundenbindung als Marketingziel: Identifikation und Analyse zentraler Determinanten, 2. Auflage, Wiesbaden., S. 1ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Science Institute (2002): 2002-2004 Research Priorities, http://www.msi.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Burleigh B. / Levy, Sidney J. (1955): The Product and the Brand, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, S. 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Pierre (1958): The Personality of a Retail Store, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, S. 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, Joseph T. (1984): How Personality Makes a Difference, in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 24, No. 6, S. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesenbeck, Hajo / Perrey, Jesko (2004): Mega-Macht Marke: Erfolg Messen, Machen, Managen, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph (2002a): Theoretisches Grundkonzept der identitätsorientierten Markenführung, in: Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph / Koers, Martin (Hrsg.): Markenmanagement: Grundfragen der identitätsorientierten Markenführung, Wiesbaden, S. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. Whan / Jaworski, Bernard J. / Maclnnis, Deborah J. (1986): Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, No. 4, S. 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, Jean-Noël (1992): Die Marke: Kapital des Unternehmens, Landsberg/Lech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, Lynn B. (1995): Building Brand Identity: A Strategy for Success in a Hostile Marketplace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, David A. (2002): Building Strong Brands, London., S. 78ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, David A. / Joachimsthaler, Erich (2001): Brand Leadership: Die Strategie für Siegermarken, München., S. 50ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph (2002a): Theoretisches Grundkonzept der identitätsorientierten Markenführung, in: Meffert, Heribert / Burmann, Christoph / Koers, Martin (Hrsg.): Markenmanagement: Grundfragen der identitätsorientierten Markenführung, Wiesbaden, S. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, Rajeev / Lehmann, Donald R. / Singh, Dipinder (1993): The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequences, in: Aaker, David A. / Biel, Alexander L. (Hrsg.): Brand Equity & Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, Hillsdale, S. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Hans H. / Mäder, Ralf / Huber, Frank (2002): Markenpersönlichkeit als Determinante von Markenloyalität, in: Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 54, No. 4, S. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, Alexander L. (2001): Grundlagen zum Markenwertaufbau, in: Esch, Franz-Rudolf (Hrsg.): Moderne Markenführung: Grundlagen, Innovative Ansätze, Praktische Umsetzungen, 3. Auflage, Wiesbaden, S. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, Jennifer L. (1997): Dimensions of Brand Personality, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, S. 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, Jennifer Lynn / Benet-Martìnez, Verònica / Garolera, Jordi (2001): Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 3, S. 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäder, Ralf (2005): Messung und Steuerung von Markenpersönlichkeit: Entwicklung eines Messinstruments und Anwendung in der Werbung mit prominenten Testimonials, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzold, Matthias (2006): Persönlichkeitsorientiertes Management von Automobilmarken: Messung der Persönlichkeit von Automobilmarken und Steuerung durch Markentransfers, http://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, Michael / Biochmann, Valerie / Hufschmid, Tanja (2007): Dimensions of Brand Personality Attributions: A Person-Centric Approach in the German Cultural Context, in: Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 35, No. 3, S. 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J. (1951): Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No. 3, S. 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes / Larcker, David F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, S. 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. (1982): An Examination of the Validity of Two Models of Attitude, in: Fornell, Claes (Hrsg.): A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, 2. Auflage, New York, S. 145–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian / Giering, Annette (1996): Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung komplexer Konstrukte: Ein Leitfaden für die Marketingforschung, in: Marketing — Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, S. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill Jr., Gilbert A. (1979): A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, S. 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob (1978): Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42, No. 2, S. 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill Jr., Gilbert A. (1998): Measurement in Marketing: Time to Refocus?, in: Hess, James D. / Monroe, Kent B. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 14th Paul D. Converse Symposium, Chicago, S. 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R. (2002): The C-OAR-SE Procedure for Scale Development in Marketing, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 4, S. 305–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, Adamantios / Winklhofer, Heidi M. (2001): Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, S. 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, Cheryl Burke / MacKenzie, Scott B. / Podsakoff, Philip M. / Mick, David Glen / Bearden, William O. (2003): A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, S. 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, Cheryl / Huang, Yili (2005): Progress and Promise: The Last Decade of International Marketing Research, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 5, S. 617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freling, Traci H. / Forbes, Lukas P. (2005): An Examination of Brand Personality through Methodological Triangulation, in: The Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, S. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, Hans J. (1992): Four Ways Five Factors are not Basic, in: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, No. 6, S. 672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, John O. (2001): Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization through the Review Process, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, S. 407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Scott B. (2003): The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, No. 3, S. 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, Audrey / Kapferer, Jean-Noèl (2003): Do Brand Personality Scales Really Measure Brand Personality?, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, S. 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, Jillian C. / Brandon, Carol (2006): Brand Personality: Exploring the Potential to Move from Factor Analytical to Circumplex Models, in: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 23, No. 8, S. 644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, Jürgen / Döring, Nicola (2006): Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4. Auflage, Heidelberg., S. 61f.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Scott B. (2003): The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, No. 3, S. 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichol, Karl (1993): Handhammer, Maschinenhammer, Hammerwerk: Zur Geschichte der Technik vor-und frühindustrieller Stielhämmer, Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siracuse, Lisa (1999): Looks Aren’t Everything: Creating Competitive Advantage with Brand Personality, in: Journal of Integrated Communications, Vol. 9, S. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasgow, Fritz / Kanfer, Ruth (1985): Equivalence of Psychological Measurement in Heterogeneous Populations, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70, No. 4, S. 662–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, William (1993): Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factor Invariance, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 58, No. 4, S. 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, Robert J. / Lance, Charles E. (2000): A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research, in: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, No. 1, S. 4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, Robert J. (2002): Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures, in: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 5, No. 2, S. 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju, Nambury S. / Laffitte, Larry J. / Byrne, Barbara M. (2002): Measurement Equivalence: A Comparison of Methods Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 3, S. 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, Holger / Schmidt, Peter / Tina-Booh, Andrea / Wieczorek, Siegrid / Schwartz, Shalom H. (2007): Testing Measurement Invariance Using Multigroup CFA: Differences Between Educational Groups in Human Values Measurement, http://www.springerlink.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip (1995): Measurement Issues in Cross-National Research, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, S. 597–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, Michael R. (1995): Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3, S. 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. / Baumgartner, Hans (1998): Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, S. 78–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, Terri A. / Williams, Ethlyn A. / Hamilton, Betti A. (2001): Measuring Invariance Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory: Perceptions of Organizational Politics in the United States and the Middle East, in: Schriesheim, Chester A. / Neider, Linda L. (Hrsg.): Equivalence in Measurement, Greenwich, S. 99–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Barbara M. / Watkins, David (2003): The Issue of Measurement Invariance Revisited, in: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, S. 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueltschy, Linda C. / Laroche, Michel / Tamilia, Robert D. / Yannopoulo, Peter (2004): Cross-Cultural Invariance of Measures of Satisfaction and Service Quality, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, S. 901–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholderer, Joachim / Grunert, Klaus G. / Brunso, Karen (2005): A Procedure for Eliminating Additive Bias from Cross-Cultural Survey Data, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, S. 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, Jean J. (1981): Comparative Marketing: The First Twenty-Five Years, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, S. 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albaum, Gerald / Peterson, Robert A. (1984): Empirical Research in International Marketing: 1976-1982, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, S. 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sin, Leo Y. M. / Cheung, Gordon W. H. / Lee, Ruby (1999): Methodology in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research: A Review and Critical Assessment, in: Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 11, No. 4, S. 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, Cheryl / Huang, Yili (2005): Progress and Promise: The Last Decade of International Marketing Research, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 5, S. 614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan P. / Craig, C. Samuel (2006): On Improving the Conceptual Foundations of International Marketing Research, in: Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 1, S. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Bedeutung der Markenpersönlichkeit. In: Kontextabhängige Konzeptualisierung der Markenpersönlichkeit. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9987-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics