Skip to main content

Leadership — Führung im Spannungsfeld von Zentrale und Dezentralen Einheiten

  • Chapter
  • 3186 Accesses

Auszug

Leadership ist ein sehr facettenreiches und komplexes Thema, das seit langer Zeit die verschiedensten Disziplinen beschäftigte. Wie weit die Frage, was Führung ist, zurückzudatieren ist, zeigt auch das obige Zitat von Laotse. Neben Führung in Militär, Religion, Politik oder im sozialen Leben ist sie vor allem auch in Organisationen von zentraler Bedeutung. Im letztgenannten Kontext spielt sich Führung insbesondere im Zusammenspiel von Menschen ab, auf deren Schultern streng genommen die Unternehmensführungsfunktion lastet.289 Die Komplexität von Führung wird auch an der Vielzahl von theoretischen Ansätzen, die sich mit der Zeit herausgebildet haben, deutlich. So wird Führung auf bestimmte persönlichkeitsbezogene Eigenschaften zurückgeführt, als spezifische Verhaltensweise interpretiert oder aber als Prozess verstanden. Im organisationalen Kontext findet sich häufig auch die Unterscheidung zwischen Management und Leadership: „There is a difference between leadership and management. Leadership is of the spirit, compounded of personality and vision; its practice is an art. Management is of the mind, a matter of accurate calculation… its practice is a science. Managers are necessary; leaders are essential.“ 290 Obwohl Wissenschaftler wie Bennis & Nanus eine qualitative Unterscheidung zwischen Managern und Leadern vornahmen und damit ihren Beitrag dazu leisteten, dass der Begriff „Management“ zunehmend mit negativen Werten assoziiert wurde,291 sind Bass, Mintzberg, Kotter oder Hinterhuber eher dem Lager zuzurechnen, das Management und Leadership unterschiedliche Rollen zuweist, diese jedoch als einander ergänzend bewertet.292 Heute herrscht grundsätzlich Einigkeit darüber, dass Führungskräfte in einem modernen Unternehmen nur dann erfolgreich sein können, wenn sie sowohl Management als auch Leadership-Fähigkeiten auf sich vereinigen.293

Vgl. Macharzina (2003), S. 123.

Field Marshal Lord W. Slim (Britischer Militärkommandant, 1897–1971) zitiert in van Maurik (2001), S. 2.

Vgl. Bennis/Nanus (1985), S. 21ff.

Vgl. Mintzberg (1973a); Kotter (1988); Kotter (2001); Bass (1990); Hinterhuber (2003).

Vgl. Kotter (1990a), S. 3ff.; Mintzberg (1973a); Yukl (2001), S. 6; Hinterhuber (2003), S. 19f.; Kent (2005), S. 1013. beschaffung, Controlling und Problemlösefahigkeiten — ebenso wichtig wie Leadership-Funktionen — Umgang mit Veränderung, Zielfestlegung, Motivation und Inspiration.294

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

o

  • Macharzina, K. (2003): Unternehmensführung — Das internationale Managementwissen. Konzepte — Methoden — Praxis. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W./ Nanus, B. (1985): Leaders — The Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row, S. 21ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973a): The Nature of managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, H. M./ Beyer, J. M. (1992): The Cultures of Work Organizations. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (1988): The Leadership Factor. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (2001): What Leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79(11), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990): Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2003): Leadership. Frankfurt a. Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (1990a): A Force for Change: How Leadership differs from Management. New York: Free Press S. 3ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2001): Leadership in Organizations. 5th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, S. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2003): Leadership. Frankfurt a. Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. R. (2002): Mainstreaming Corporate Entrepreneurship: Leadership at every Level of Organizations. Babson Entrepreneurial Review. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1974): Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. New York: Free Press, S. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, T. O./ Jaques, E. (1990): Military Executive Leadership. In Clark, K. E./ Clark, M. B.: Measures of Leadership. West Orange: Leadership Library of America, 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jago, A. G. (1982): Leadership: Perspectives in Theory and Research. Management Science, Vol. 28(3), 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (1997): Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (1997): Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J./ Hanges, P. J./ Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A./ Dorfman, P. W./ Javidan, M./ Dickson, M./ Gupta, V. & Associates (1999): Cultural Influences on Leadership and Organizations: Project GLOBE. In Mobley, W. H./ Gessner, M. J./ Arnold, V.: Advances in global Leadership Stamford: JAI Press, 171–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2001): Leadership in Organizations. 5th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, S. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2001): Leadership in Organizations. 5th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, S. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (1998): Leadership in Organizations. 4th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall S. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2003): Leadership. Frankfurt a. Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch, S. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Rosenstiel, L. (2003a): Grundlagen der Führung. In von Rosenstiel, L./ Regnet, E./ Domsch, M. E.: Führung von Mitarbeitern. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D. (1986): Entrepreneurship, Intrapreneurship, and Venture Capital. Massachusetts/Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß, G. G./ Pongratz, H. J. (1998): Der Arbeitskraftunternehmer. Eine neue Grundform der Ware Arbeitskraft? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 1, 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1980): Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. 5., rev. Auflage. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T. (1910): Lectures on Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. In Parr, P. C: N.N. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A. (2002): The Implications of Strategy and social Context for the Relationship between Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23(3), 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R./ Grunwald, W. (1980a): Führungslehre. Band 1 — Grundlagen der Führung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1974): Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. New York: Free Press, S. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G./ DeVader, C. L./ Alliger, G. M. (1986): A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Personality Traits and Leadership Perceptions: An Application of Validity Generalization Procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71(3), 402–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A./ Locke, E. A. (1991): Leadership: Do Traits matter? The Executive, Vol. 5(2), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O./ Martin, R. (2004): Implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability, and Stability over Time. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89(2), 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerman, L. R./ Kennedy, J. K. J./ Wirtz, P. W. (1994): Implicit Leadership Theories: Content, Structure and Generalizability. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 5(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. L./ Forsyth, D. R. (1991): The Effects of Prototype-based Biases on Leadership Appraisals: A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory. Small Group Research, Vol. 22(3), 360–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J./ Hanges, P. J./ Ruiz-Quantilla, S. A./ Dorfan, P. W./ Javidan, M./ Dickson, M./ Gupta, V. & GLOBE Country Co-Investigators (1991): Cultural Differences on leadership and Organizations: Project GLOBE. In Mobley, W. H.: Advances in global Leadership. Stamford: JAI Press, 171–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1948): Personal Factors associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. Journal of Psychology, Vol. 25, 35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D. (1959): A Review of the Relationship between Personality and Performance in small Groups. Psycholgical Bulletin, Vol. 56, 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D./ Peters, M. P. (2002): Entrepreneurship. 5. Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A./ Ireland, R. D./ Camp, M./ Sexton, D. L. (2001a): Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22(6-7), 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (2007): Der gestiefelte Kater als Unternehmer. Lehren aus Management und Märchen. Wiesbaden Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A./ Locke, E. A. (1991): Leadership: Do Traits matter? The Executive, Vol. 5(2), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerman, L. R./ Kennedy, J. K. J./ Wirtz, P. W. (1994): Implicit Leadership Theories: Content, Structure and Generalizability. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 5(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (1997): Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. S./ Smith, D. B./ Martorana, P. V./ Owens, P. D. (2003): The Impact of Chief Executive Officer Personality on Top Management Team Dynamics: One Mechanism by which Leadership affects organizational Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88(5), 795–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, C. A. (1947): The Principles and Traits of Leadership Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 42(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W. O. (1947): A Review of Leadership Studies with particular Reference to military Problems. Psycholgical Bulletin, Vol. 44(1), 54–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R./ Grunwald, W. (1980a): Führungslehre. Band 1 — Grundlagen der Führung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R./ Grunwald, W. (1980a): Führungslehre. Band 1 — Grundlagen der Führung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J./ Aditya, R. N. (1997): The social scientific Study of Leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, Vol. 23(3), 409–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhorta, N. (1993): Marketing Research — An applied Orientation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D. (1959): A Review of the Relationship between Personality and Performance in small Groups. Psycholgical Bulletin, Vol. 56, 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C. (1986): Self-Leadership: Toward an expanded Theory of Self-influence Processes in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11(3), 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A./ Locke, E. A. (1991): Leadership: Do Traits matter? The Executive, Vol. 5(2), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A./ Ireland, R. D./ Hoskisson, R. E. (2001b): Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A. (1982): Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In Kent, C: The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G./ DeVader, C. L./ Alliger, G. M. (1986): A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Personality Traits and Leadership Perceptions: An Application of Validity Generalization Procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71(3), 402–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990): Personality Structure: Emergence of the five-factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 4(1), 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bern, D. J. (1974): Meinungen, Einstellungen, Vorurteile. Zürich: Benziger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992): The “Big Five” Personality Variables — Contruct Confusion: Description versus Prediction. Human Performance, Vol. 5(1/2), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrae, R. R./ Costa, P. T. J. (1999): A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In Pervin, L. A./ John, O. P.: Handbook of Personality: Theory & Reserahc. New York: Guilford Press, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrae, R. R./ Costa, P. T. J. (1999): A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In Pervin, L. A./ John, O. P.: Handbook of Personality: Theory & Reserahc. New York: Guilford Press, S. 81ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D./ Rentfrow, P. J./ Swann, W. B. J. (2003): A very brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 37(6), 504–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (2006): Führung und Zusammenarbeit. Eine unternehmerische Führungslehre. 6., überarbeitete Auflage. München: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2004a): Strategische Unternehmensführung I — Strategisches Denken. 7. Auflage. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter S. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (2002) [Hrsg.]: Organisationstheorien. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H./ Friedrich, S. A./ Matzler, K./ Pechlaner, H. (2000b) [Hrsg.]: Die Zukunft der diversifizierten Unternehmung. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H./ Krauthammer, E. (2001): Leadership — Mehr als Management. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A. (1965): Some Economics of Property Rights. Il Politico, Vol. 30(4), 816–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A./ Demsetz, H. (1972): Production, Information Costs and economic Organization. American Economic Review, Vol. 62(5), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937): The Nature of the Firm. Economica, Vol. 4(16), 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A./ Prahalad, C. K. (1995): The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, S. A. (2002): Kräftekonzentration in der diversifizierten Unternehmung: eine ressourcenorientierte Betrachtung der Desinvestition. 1. Auflage. Wiesbaden: DUV S. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A./ Keats, B. W./ DeMarie, S. M. (1998a): Navigating in the new competitive Lands cape: Building strategic Flexibility and competitive Advantage in the 21st Century. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12(4), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. M./ Baden-Fuller, C. (1994): Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15(7), 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V./ MacMillan, I. C./ Surie, G. (2004): Entrepreneurial Leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural Construct. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 19(2), 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santora, J. C./ Seaton, W./ Sarros, J. C. (1999): Changing times: Entrepreneurial Leadership in a community-based non-profit Organization. Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol. 6(3-4), 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pointer, D. D./ Sanchez, J. P. (1994): Leadership: A Framework for thinking and acting. In Shortell, S./ Kaluzny, A.: Health Care Management: A Text in Organization Theory and Behavior. New York: Delmar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A./ Goshal, S. (2000a): Tap your Subsidiaries for global Reach. In Bartlett, C. A./ Goshal, S.: Transnational Management: Text, Cases and Readings in Cross-border Management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 588–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2001): Wie machen wir unsere Unternehmen unternehmerischer? Teill: Ein Plädoyer für dezentrales Unternehmertum in mittleren und großen Unternehmen. In Hinterhuber, H. H./ Stahl, H. K.: Fallen die Unternehmensgrenzen? Beiträge zur Außenorientierung der Unternehmensführung. Renningen-Malmsheim: Expert Verlag, 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1994): Multinational Enterprises and the Globalization of Innovation Capacity. Research Policy, Vol. 23, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V. (1999): Technology Development Control Styles in multinational Corporations. A Case Study. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, Vol. 16(2), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A./ Goshal, S. (1998): Transnational Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strikwerda, J. (2003): An entrepreneurial Model of Corporate Governance: Devolving Powers to Subsidiary Boards. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, Vol. 3(2), 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1988): Leadership Research: Some forgotten, ignored, or overlooked Findings. In Hunt, J. G./ Baliga, B. R./ Dachler, H. P./ Schriesheim, C. A.: Emerging Leadership Vistas. Lexington: Lexington Books, 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. (1992): Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are the Distinctions worth making? Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35(1), 232–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. (1999): Leading learning and learning to lead. In Conger, J. A./ Spreitzer, G. M./ Lawler, E. E. I.: The Leader’s Change Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 127–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A./ Dharwadkar, R./ George, G. (2000): Entrepreneurship in multinational Subsidiaries: The Effects of corporate and local Environmental Context. Working Paper, Vol., 1-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1989): On Becoming a Leader. New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A./ Nixon, R. D./ Hoskisson, R. E./ Kochhar, R. (1999): Corporate Entrepreneurship and cross-functional Fertilization: Activation, Process and Disintegration of a new Product Design Team. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 23(3), 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. J./ Ebadi, Y. M. (1989): Leadership Decision Making in a Service Organization: A Field Test of the Vroom-Yetton Model. Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 62(3), 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayadurai, S./ Sohail, M. S.: Corporate Entrepreneurship in multinational Subsidiaries in Malaysia: The Effects on past Performance. Twelfth Annual International Conference on Advances in Management. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (1987): SBU Strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 30(3), 477–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthel, J./ Becker, F. G. (2003): Personalmanagement — Grundzüge für Konzeptionen betrieblicher Personalarbeit. 7., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M. H. (1990): The New Competition. Institutions of industrial Restructuring. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delany, E. (2000): Strategic Development of the multinational Subsidiary through Subsidiary Initiative-taking. Longe Range Planning, Vol. 33(2), 220–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J./ Hood, N./ Young, S. (2005): Subsidiary Entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive Forces, and Subsidiary Performance. International Business Review, Vol. 14(2), 227–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, S. L./ Brock, D. M. (2002): The Development of Subsidiary-Management Research: Review and theoretical Analysis. International Business Review, Vol. 11(2), 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W./ Nanus, B. (1992): Führungskräfte: Die 4 Schlüsselstrategien erfolgreichen Führens. 5. Auflage. Frankfurt a. Main/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2004): Centralization and Autonomy: Back to the Future. International Business Review, Vol. 13(2), 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L./ McGrath, J. E. (1993): Group Processes in Organizations. In Cooper, C. L./ Robertson, I. T.: International Review of organizational Psychology. New York: Wiley, 333–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L./ Ryan, R. M. (1987): The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53(6), 1024–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loher, B. T./ Noe, R. A./ Moeller, N. L./ Fitzgerald, M. P. (1985): A Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70(2), 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H./ Friedrich, S. A./ Matzler, K./ Pechlaner, H. (2000a): Die strategische Führung der diversifizierten Unternehmung. Wie schafft die Zentrale Werte? Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 70(12), 1351–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1983): The Psychology of Control. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S. L./ Thomas, A. S. (2000): Culture and entrepreneurial Potential: A nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16(1), 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M./ Speckart, G. (1979): Models of Attitude-Behavior Relations. Psychological Review, Vol. 86(5), 452–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2004b): Strategische Unternehmensführung II — Strategisches Handeln. 7. Auflage. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H./ Pechlaner, H./ Fischer, E./ Hammann, E. (2003): Innovative Führung in Tochtergesellschaften — Theorie und Praxis von Leadership. 41. Bozen/Bolzano: EURAC Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D./ Bygrave, W. D./ Autio, E. (2003): Global Entrepreneurship Monitor — 2003 Executive Report. Babson Park/London, S. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (1997): Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. (1996): Research on Leadership: One View of the Future. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41(2), 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991): The Theory of planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50(2), 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, H.-J. (1998): Risikokommunikation als Verhaltensänderung — einige ausgewählte Theorieansätze und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten aus der Psychologie. Arbeitspapier der AG “Ethik”/FSP “Risikokommunikation”. Bremen, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2001, Februar): Kombination und Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Analyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], Vol. 2(1), 11 Absätze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromrey, H. (2002): Empirische Sozialforschung — Modelle und Methoden der standardisierten Datenerhebung und Datenauswertung. 10., vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 271ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J./ Döring, N. (2003): Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2002): Konstruktivismus. In Flick, U./ von Kardorff, E./ Steinke, I.: Qualitative Forschung — Ein Handbuch. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlts Enzyklopädie, 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A./ Ricart i Costa, J. E./ Nixon, R. D. (1998b): The new Frontier. In Hitt, M. A./ Ricart i Costa, J. E./ Nixon, R. D.: Managing strategically in an interconnected World. Chichester: Wiley, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I./ Silvers, R. C. (1991): Organizational Development and Tranformation. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 42(1), 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001): Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS — Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camphausen, B. (2007): Strategisches Management. Planung | Entscheidung | Controlling. 2. Auflage. München/Wien: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgetts, R. M./ Kuratko, D. F. (1988): Management. 2nd Edition. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K./ Rajagopalan, N./ Rasheed, A. M. A. (1991): Diversification and Performance: Critical Review and Future Directions. Academy of Management Studies, Vol. 28(5), 529–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hoogh, A. H. B./ Den Hartog, D. N./ Koopman, P. L./ Thierry, H./ Van den Berg, P. T./ Van der Weide, J. G. & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2004): Charismatic Leadership, environmental Dynamism, and Performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 13(4), 447–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H./ Zanna, M. P. (1978): Attitudinal Qualities relating to the Strength of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14(4), 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, C. W./ Schendel, D. E. (1978): Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1971): Gesammelte Aufsätze. Bd. 1 — Das Problem der sozialen Wirklichkeit Den Haag: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995): Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J./ Gilbert, J. A./ Thor, K. K./ Mumford, M. D. (1991): Leadership and social Intelligence: Linking social Perspectiveness and behavioral Flexibility to Leader Effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 2(4), 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1991): Teaching smart People how to learn. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69(3), 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N./ Schippers, M. C./ Koopman, P. L. (2002): The Impact of Leader Behavior on Trust in Management and Co-Workers. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol. 28(4), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L./ Ajzen, I. (1991): Predicting dishonest Actions using the Theory of planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 25(3), 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hoogh, A. H. B./ Den Hartog, D. N./ Koopman, P. L./ Thierry, H./ Van den Berg, P. T./ Van der Weide, J. G. & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2004): Charismatic Leadership, environmental Dynamism, and Performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 13(4), 447–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, F. (1976): Entwicklung der Organisationsforschung. Band 1. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oijen, A./ Douma, S. (2000): Diversification Strategy and the Roles of the Centre. Longe Range Planning, Vol. 33(4), 560–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner, A. R. (1984): The Spellbinders. Charismatic political Leadership. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A./ Jennings, D. F./ Kuratko, D. F. (1999a): Guest Editorial: Corporate Entrepreneurship in a global Economy. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 24(1), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992): The “Big Five” Personality Variables — Contruct Confusion: Description versus Prediction. Human Performance, Vol. 5(1/2), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M./ MacKenzie, S. B./ Moorman, R. H./ Fetter, R. (1990): Transformational Leader Behavior and their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction and organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 1(2), 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M. (2000): Narcissistic Leaders. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. G./ Carpenter, M. A. (1998): Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41(2), 158–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankowski, D. (1995): The charismatic Leader as Narcissist: Understanding the Abuse of Power Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 23(4), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J./ Howell, J. M. (1992): Personality and charismatic Leadership. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 3(2), 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, H. (1991): Zur Kultivierung des Unternehmerischen im Unternehmen. Von den historischen Wurzeln zur unternehmerischen Avantgarde im Management. In Laub, U. D./ Schneider, D.: Innovation und Unternehmertum. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001): Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S./ Naffziger, D. W./ Kuratko, D. F./ Montagno, R. V. (1993): An interactive Model of Corporate Entrepreneurship Process. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 17(2), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1992): Organizational Culture and Leadership. 2nd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (2006): Führung und Zusammenarbeit. Eine unternehmerische Führungslehre. 6., überarbeitete Auflage. München: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985): Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press, S. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./ Bass, B. M. (1988): Transformational Leadership, Charisma and beyond. In Hunt, J. G./ Baliga, B. R./ Dachler, H. P./ Schriesheim, C. A.: Emerging Leadership Vistas. Lexington: D.C. Heath, 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978): Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (1997): Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, S. 133ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A./ Hitt, M. A. (1995): The new competitive Landscape. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 (Special Issue), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R./ Grunwald, W. (1980b): Führungslehre. Band 2 — Kooperative Führung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F. J. (1993): Transforming Leadership Studies: Bernard Bass’ Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 4(3), 379–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharzina, K. (2003): Unternehmensführung — Das internationale Managementwissen. Konzepte — Methoden — Praxis. Wiesbaden: Gabler, S. 483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M./ Avolio, B. J. (1990): Developing transformational Leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 14(5), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2004a): Strategische Unternehmensführung I — Strategisches Denken. 7. Auflage. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (1997): Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, S. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L./ Ajzen, I. (1991): Predicting dishonest Actions using the Theory of planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 25(3), 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G./ Schuler, R. S. (1976): Leader Reward and Sanctions: Behavior Relations Criteria in a large public Utility. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D./ Hitt, M. A. (2005): Achieving and maintaining strategic Competitiveness in the 21st Century: The Role of strategic Leadership. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19(4), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, N. (2001): Corporate Entrepreneurship: Antidote or Oxymoron? European Management Journal, Vol. 19(5), 526–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D./ Rentfrow, P. J./ Swann, W. B. J. (2003): A very brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 37(6), 504–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C./ Mason, P. A. (1984): Upper Echelons: the Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9(2), 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M./ Litterer, J. (1995): Toward entrepreneurial Organizations: Meeting Ambiguity with Engagement. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 19(3), 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (1999): The Determinants and Consequences of Subsidiary Initiative in multinational Corporations. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 24(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A./ Goshal, S. (1990): The multinational Corporation as an interorganizational Network. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15(4), 603–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R./ Berger, D. (1972): Entrepreneurship in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16(1), 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1979): Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Strategy. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 20(3), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanan, M. (1976): Venturing Corporations think small to stay strong. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 54(3), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggadike, E. R. (1979): Corporate Diversification: Entry, Strategy and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1991): Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research. Organization Science, Vol. 2(3), 239–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draeger-Ernst, A. (2003): Vitalisierendes Intrapreneurship. München & Mehring: Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (1988): The Leadership Factor. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G./ Hofstede, G. J. (2004): Cultures and Organizations — Software of the Mind. Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. 2nd ed., rev. and exp. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M./ Todor, W. D./ Grover, R. A./ Huber, V. L. (1984): Situational Moderators of Leader Reward and Punishment Behaviors: Fact or Fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 34(1), 21–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vozikis, G. S./ Bruton, G. D./ Prasad, D./ Merikas, A. A. (1999): Linking Corporate Entrepreneurship to financial Theory through additional Value Creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 24(2), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W./ Nanus, B. (1985): Leaders — The Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V./ Jago, A. G. (1988): The new Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations. Inglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, W./ Witt, P. (1995): Holding-Modelle und Holding-Moden. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 65(12), 1341–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, A./ Yetton, P. W. (1987): Manager Behavior, Leadership Style, and Subordinate Performance: An empirical Extension of the Vroom-Yetton Conflict Rule. Organizational Behavior abd Human Decision Processes, Vol. 39(3), 384–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A./ Kerr, J. (1977): Theories and Measures of Leadership. A critical Appraisal of present and future Directions. In Hunt, J. G./ Larson, L. L.: Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, S. R./ Egelhoff, W. G. (1986): Centralization in Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 17(2), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G./ Rolander, D. (1990): Action in Heterarchies: New Approaches to managing the MNC. In Bartlett, C. A./ Doz, Y. L./ Hedlund, G.: Managing the Global Firm. London: Rouledge, 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1961): Some Effects of perceived Status on Responses to innovative Behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 61, 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, C. (1995): Befragungsverfahren. In Flick, U./ von Kardorff, E./ Keupp, H.: Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz, 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, C. (2003): Qualitative Interviews — ein Überblick*. In Flick, U./ von Kardorff, E./ Steinke, I.: Qualitative Forschung — Ein Handbuch. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlts Enzyklopädie, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, S. (2000): Evaluation von Veränderungsprozessen. In Schreyögg, G./ Conrad, P.: Organisatorischer Wandel und Transformation Wiesbaden: Gabler, 239–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G./ Windeler, A./ Becker, A./ Schulz, H.-J. (1990): Computer und Macht in Organisationen. Mikropolitische Analysen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A. I./ Robertson Kramer, T./ Robbins, D. K. (1997): Effects of Managers’ entrepreneurial Behavior on Subordinates. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12(2), 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. (1984): Transforming Leadership: Sources, Process and Consequences. Academy of Management Conference. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1987): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit und den Konjunkturzyklus. 7. Auflage. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, H. S./ Kuratko, D. F./ Montagno, R. (1999): Perception of internal Factors for Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Canadian and U.S. Managers. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 24(2), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M./ Meindl, J. R./ Pastor, J.-C. (2003): Shared Leadership in Work Teams: A social Network Approach. In Pearce, C. L./ Conger, J. A.: Shared Leadership. Refraining the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks/London/New Dehli: Sage Publications, 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.N. (2007b): German Company Directory. AHK — German Chamber of Commerce in China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S./ Kuratko, D. F./ Zahra, S. A. (2002): Middle Managers’ Perception of the internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing a Measurement Scale. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 17(3), 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S. I./ Frese, M./ Friedrich, C./ Unger, J. M. (2005): Entrepreneurial Orientation: A psychological Model of Success among Southern African small Business Owners. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 14(3), 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A./ Prahalad, C. K. (1995): The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K. B./ Hooijberg, R. (2000): Strategic Leadership Research: Moving on. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 11(4), 515–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2003): Leadership. Frankfurt a. Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M./ Hambrick, D. C./ Cannella, A. A. (2001): Upper Echelons: Donald Hambrick on Executives and Strategy. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 15(3), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S. (1988): Does Leadership make a Difference to organizational Performance? Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33(3), 388–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A./ Ramirez, G. G./ House, R. J. (1996b): The Effects of U.S. CEO Leader Behavior on Firm Profits under Conditions of environmental Certainty and Uncertainty. Working Paper, Reginald Jones Center for Strategic Management, Wharton School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D./ Hitt, M. A. (2005): Achieving and maintaining strategic Competitiveness in the 21st Century: The Role of strategic Leadership. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19(4), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1984): Leadership in Administration: A sociological Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G. (1991): Leadership: A new Synthesis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, G. R. (1998): Leadership and the social Imperative of Organizations in the 21st Century. In Hickman, G. R.: Leading Organizations: Perspektives for a new Era. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 559–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2004b): Strategische Unternehmensführung II — Strategisches Handeln. 7. Auflage. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1997): Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect. Organization Studies, Vol. 18(1), 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A./ Geletkanycz, M. A./ Sanders, W. G. (2004): Upper Echelons Research revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, Vol. 30(6), 749–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A./ Geletkanycz, M. A./ Sanders, W. G. (2004): Upper Echelons Research revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, Vol. 30(6), 749–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2001): Wie machen wir unsere Unternehmen unternehmerischer? Teill: Ein Plädoyer für dezentrales Unternehmertum in mittleren und großen Unternehmen. In Hinterhuber, H. H./ Stahl, H. K.: Fallen die Unternehmensgrenzen? Beiträge zur Außenorientierung der Unternehmensführung. Renningen-Malmsheim: Expert Verlag, 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, W. J. (2001): Navigating the competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of competitive Aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44(4), 858–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M./ Schoonhoven, B. C. (1996): Resource-based View of strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and social Effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science, Vol. 7(2), 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Leadership — Führung im Spannungsfeld von Zentrale und Dezentralen Einheiten. In: Dezentrale Leadership. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9965-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics