Skip to main content
  • 1296 Accesses

Abstract

The definition of ‘internationalization’ according to Welch and Luostarinen (1988) is the process of business activities across home country borders with an increasing degree in operations8. While the term ‘international business activity’ implies the exchange of resources across national borders (Fayerweather, 1978), the ‘internationalization process’ is traditionally perceived as the consequence of incremental adjustments to changing conditions within the firm and its environment (Aharoni, 1966). Most significantly, Perlmutter (1969) already then acknowledged the conjunction of internationalization and attitudinal development within the firm, indicating the impact of the company expansion across borders on an organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The term internationalization is applied when referring to country, industry or firm-level issues (Dana et al., 2004). Globalization, on the other hand, is according to the World Trade Organization (WTO) only used on a country or industry level and describes the macroeconomic and cross-national continuous integration of the world economy.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Market entry strategies are largely discussed in the international management literature, however, the question of choosing a market to process is also a dominant topic in the international marketing literature (Meffert and Bolz, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For an insight into the role the foreign subsidiaries of international corporations can have on the technological development of the host country see Berger (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Different classifications of risks in international business activity can be found in the literature. For empirical evidence on risks in the international competitive arena cf. Tan (1996) and Brouthers (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A foreign direct investment is an “investment by one firm in another with the intention of gaining a degree of control over that firm’s operation” (Dicken, 2003, p. 51).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a deeper insight into the environmental influencing factors, especially the micro-and macroeconomic environment of internationalization decisions cf. Dülfer (2001) and chapter 2.1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a recent study on the knowledge transfer between international joint venture or alliance partners see Klijn (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For an overview and the development of the theories applied to the international entrepreneurship field consult Dana et al. (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meckl and Schramm (2005, p. 15) suggest that transaction cost economics and the Uppsala model of internationalisation are the two most influential schools of internationalisation.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a comprehensive literature review and discussion of the process models see Leonidou and Katsikeas (1996) and Ellis and Pecotich (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. In addition, the incremental internationalization approach was also taken up in the diversification literature (Chandler, 1986; Vernon, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. The terms local, national, international, multinational and global were defined by Perlmutter (1969) and refer to the breadth of the geographic dispersion of an firm.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E-Ventures are believed to be similar to service firms in their internationalization behavior because of mutual product and firm characteristics (Ekeledo and Sivakumar, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. The term ‘marketspace’ was coined by Negroponte (1995); cf. introductory remarks.

    Google Scholar 

  15. According to Miesenbock (1988, p. 173) it is the most prominent model because it has since received widespread attention in the literature. For example, Cavusgil (1980, 1982) also bases his model on increasing export activities, and on a push mechanism from the external environment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Theoretical Foundations of Firm Internationalization. In: Antecedents of Venture Firms’ Internationalization. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9821-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics