Skip to main content

Einführung in die Problemstellung

  • Chapter
Multiprojektmanagement
  • 4100 Accesses

Auszug

Eine zunehmende Volatilität der Umwelt, ein stärker werdender globaler Wettbewerbsdruck sowie wachsende Kundenansprüche haben branchenübergreifend zu einer nachhaltigen Veränderung der Rahmenbedingungen für Unternehmen gesorgt. Vor allem das hiermit einhergehende gestiegene Kostenbewusstsein hat seine Spuren hinterlassen. So zeigen sich Unternehmen verstärkt bemüht, Prozesse, Organisationsformen und Methoden zu etablieren, die einen zielgerichteten effizienten und effektiven Einsatz der vorhandenen Ressourcen ermöglichen. Speziell der Organisation in Form von Projekten wird hierbei eine zunehmende Bedeutung beigemessen. Anlass ist die Erkenntnis des Managements, dass die Arbeit in Form von Projekten eine besonders flexible und effiziente Form zur Umsetzung von Vorhaben ist.. Aber auch zahlreiche wissenschaftliche Studien liefern eine Bestätigung der Vorteile, die aus projektorientierten Organisationsstrukturen für Unternehmen erwachsen. So fördern Projekte beispielsweise die intra-organisationale Zusammenarbeit, indem verteilte Unternehmens-Kompetenzen einfach und schnell zusammengeführt werden können. Darüber hinaus lassen Projekte durchgehende Kosten-Nutzen-Betrachtungen zu, da Projektbudgets in der Regel an klare messbare Projektziele gekoppelt sind und nur unter bestimmten Prämissen freigegeben werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Cooper, R.; S. Edgett; E. Kleinschmidt (2001): Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study. R&D Management 31(4), 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.; D. Wilemon (1996): Changing patterns in industrial R&D management. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13, 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balck, H. (1990): Paradigmawechsel im Projektmanagement — Projekte als Bewegungsform des technologisch-organisatorischen Strukturwandels. In: H. Balck (Hrsg.): Neuorientierung im Projektmanagement. TÜ V-Rheinland, Köln, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K. (2002): Project Management 2002. IEEE Engineering Management Review 30(4), 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, E.; C. Campana (2005): Strategisches Projektmanagement. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayal, I.; R. Rothberg (1986): Strategic control of R&D resource allocation in diversified businesses. Journal of Product Innovation Management 3(4), 238–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, S.; A. J. Shenhar (2000): Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47(2), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D.; T. Tyebjee (1978): A Model for Selection of Interdependent R&D Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 25(2), 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M. S. (1994): Practical R&D project prioritization. Research Technology Management 37(5), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral-Cardoso, C.; R. L. Payne (1996): Instrumental and supportive use of formal selection methods in R&D project selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43(4), 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell-Foulquie, P.; J. L. Munuera-Aleman; A. I. Rodriguez-Escudero (2004): Criteria employed for go/no-go decisions when developing successful highly innovative products. Industrial Marketing Management 33(4), 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund, R.; R. Graham (1999): Linking Projects to Strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16(1), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, A.; S. Rosenthal (1998): Towards holistic’ Front End’ in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, M. (1993): Implementing strategy through project management. Long Range Planning 26(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, S. C; K. B. Clark (1992a): Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development. Harvard Business Review 70(2), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S.; D. P. Norton (2006): How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Business Review 84(3), 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S.; D. P. Norton (2005): The office of strategy making. Harvard Business Review 84(3), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P.; K. Saad; T. Erickson (1991): Third generation R&D. Managing the link to corporate starategy. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millson, M.; S. Raj; D. Wilemon (1992): A survey of major approaches for accelerating new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A.; K. Nobeoka (1998): Thinking beyond lean. How Multi-Project Management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenson, J. K.; G. J. Prasad; Y. Zhang (2003): Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. Journal of Engineering Design 14(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin, D.; N. J. Barrowman (2002): An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development. Management Science 48(7), 938–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. H.; A. K. Chakrabarti (1999): Speeding up the pace of new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16(3), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobeoka, K. (1995a): Inter-project learning in new product development. Academy of Management Journal 38(4), 432–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pil, F.; S. Cohen (2006): Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Academy of Management Review 31(4), 995–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swink, M. (2003): Completing projects on-time: How project acceleration affects new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20(4), 319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L.; K. M. Eisenhardt (1995): Product Development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20(2), 343–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M.; C. S. Musso; S. D. Anthony (2004): Maximizing the returns from research. Research Technology Management 47(4), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiß, M. (2004): Koordination. In: G. Schreyögg; A. von Werder (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Unternehmensführung und Organisation. 4. Aufl., Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart, 1164–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L.; O. Sorenson (2001): The Dangers of Modularity. Harvard Business Review 79(8), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, T. A.; R. Ahmadi (2004): Concurrent crashing and overlapping in product development. Operations Research 52(4), 606–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A.; K. Nobeoka (1998): Thinking beyond lean. How Multi-Project Management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L.; O. Sorenson (2001): The Dangers of Modularity. Harvard Business Review 79(8), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, T. A.; R. Ahmadi (2004): Concurrent crashing and overlapping in product development. Operations Research 52(4), 606–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A.; K. Nobeoka (1998): Thinking beyond lean. How Multi-Project Management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, E.; A. von Werder (1993): Zentralbereiche. Organisatorische Formen und Effizienzbeurteilung. In: E. Frese; A. von Werder; W. Maly (Hrsg.): Zentalbereiche. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Erfahrungen. Stuttgart, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (1999): Organisationstheorien. 3. Aufl., Kohlhammer Verlag. s. 193

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. G.; E. J. Zajac (1991): Intraorganizational power and organizational design: Reconcilling rational and coalitional models of organization. Organization Science 2(4), 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley. S. 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.; D. Wilemon (1996): Changing patterns in industrial R&D management. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13, 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millson, M.; D. Wilemon (2002): The impact of organizational integration and product development proficiency on market success. Industrial Marketing Management 31, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobeoka, K.; M. A. Cusumano: Multi-Project Management: Inter-project interdependency and organizational coordination in new product development. Working Paper MITJP 94-13 Center for International Studies. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1994). S. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, E.; C. Campana (2005): Strategisches Projektmanagement. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J.; D. Dvir: Project Management Evolution: Past History and Future Research Directions. In: P. M. Institute (Hrsg.): PMI Research Conference. London (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura, M.; Y. Fujimi; K. Izui; S. Nishiwaki (2006): Decision-malking support system for human resource allocation in product development projects. International Journal of Production Research 5(1), 831–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard, J. F.; R. Balachandra; P. E. Kaufmann (1988): An Interactive Approach to R&D Project Selection and Termination. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35(3), 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.; S. Edgett; E. Kleinschmidt (2001): Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study. R&D Management 31(4), 364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002): Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1), 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin, D.; N. J. Barrowman (2002): An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development. Management Science 48(7), 940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, K. (1997): A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science 8(2), 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, K.; J. Rubleske; J. Howison (2006): Coordination Theory: A Ten-Year Retrospective. In: P. Zhang; D. Galletta (Hrsg.): Human computer Interaction And Management Information Systems: Foundations. Advances in Management Information Systems, Bd. 6 M E Sharpe Inc., 120–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobeoka, K. (1995a): Inter-project learning in new product development. Academy of Management Journal 38(4), 432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S.; A. Mandelbaum; V. Nguyen; E. Schwerer (1995): From project to process management: An empirically—based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Science 41(3), 459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elonen, S.; K. A. Artto (2003): Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments. International Journal of Project Management 21(6), 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, S.; A. J. Shenhar (2000): Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47(2), 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr.Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Einführung in die Problemstellung. In: Multiprojektmanagement. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9761-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics