Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die neue politische Rolle von Unternehmen in einer globalisierten Welt – Ein Überblick über die Forschungslandschaft

  • Chapter
Internationale Unternehmensführung

Zusammenfassung

Im letzten Jahrzehnt haben verschiedene Unternehmen begonnen, originäre Staatsaufgaben zu übernehmen (vgl. Margolis und Walsh, 2003; Matten und Crane, 2005; Walsh et al., 2003). Dies gilt besonders für multinationale Unternehmen (MNU). Diese engagieren sich in den Bereichen Gesundheit, Bildungsleistungen, soziale Sicherheit und Schutz der Menschenrechte in Ländern, in denen staatliche Organe nicht in der Lage sind, diese Leistungen bereitzustellen (vgl. Kinley und Tadaki, 2004; Matten und Crane, 2005); sie adressieren gesellschaftliche Probleme wie AIDS, Unterernährung, Obdachlosigkeit und Analphabetentum (vgl. Margolis und Walsh, 2003; Rosen et al., 2003); sie formulieren Ethikkodizes (z.B. Cragg, 2005a) und beteiligen sich an einer Selbstregulierung, um globale Regulierungs- und moralische Orientierungslücken zu schließen (vgl. Scherer und Smid, 2000); schließlich begünstigen sie Frieden und Stabilität (vgl. Fort und Schipani, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. 2000. The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54 (3): 17-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507-525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1: 177-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hartfield, J. D. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 446-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, D. 1999. Disposable people. New slavery in the global economy. Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, D. 2005. Understanding global slavery. Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility. The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R. 2007. Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 201-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Blackman, S. A. B. 1991. Perfect markets and easy virtue: Business ethics and the invisible hand. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. 1984. Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9: 248-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 2000. What is globalization? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, B. L., & Luckmann, T. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Anchor: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 488-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Bartunek, J. M., Fort, T. L., & Zald, M. N. 2007. Corporations as social change agents : Individual, interpersonal, institutional, and environmental dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 32: 788-793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J., & Brewer, T. 1994. International business political behaviour: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19: 119-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.) 1997. Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. 2000. Global business regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 435-455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. 1980. Marxist theories of imperialism: A critical survey. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R. 1992. Business environments and public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34 (July/August): 39-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. 2001. Models of management morality for the new millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11: 365-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., & Mazlish, B. (Eds.). Leviathans. Multinational corporations and the new global history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. 1990. Modern organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. 1994. Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, W. (Ed.) 2005a. Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, W. 2005b. Ethics, globalization and the phenomenon of self-regulation: An introduction. In: W. Cragg (Ed.), Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization: 1-19. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, W. 2005c. Ethics, law and corporate self-regulation. In: W. Cragg (Ed.), Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization: 23-50. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. C. 2002. Argument and change in world politics. Ethics, decolonialization, and humanitarian intervention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. 1998. On democracy. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. 2007. Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32: 901-924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dine, J. 2005. Companies, international trade and human rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, C., & Thompson, G. 2002. Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance, 6: 111-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubbink, W. 2004. The fragile structure of free-market society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14: 23-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. 1999. Transnational democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 7 (1): 30-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W., & Fort, T. L. 2003. Corporate hypergoals, sustainable peace, and the adapted firm. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36: 563-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1986. The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds), Foundations of social choice theory: 103-132, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000): Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 159-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fort, T. L., & Schipani, C. A. 2004. The role of business in fostering peaceful societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. 1998. Business and society. In G. L. Cooper & C. Argyris (Eds.), The concise Blackwell encyclopaedia of management: 54-56. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. 2001. A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 189-207. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September. Reprint in T. Donaldson & P. H. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach: 217-223. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1989. The end of history? The National Interest, Summer 1989, 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. 2003. Deliberative democracy and international labor standards. Governance, 16: 51-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (Eds.) 2000a. Legalization and world politics. International Organization, 54 (3), special issue summer 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. 2000b. Introduction: Legalization and world politics. International Organization, 54 (3): 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36 (1): 5-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. 2004. Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Chaltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, A., & Thompson, F. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, A., & Thompson, F. 2004. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1996a. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1996b. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie. In J. Habermas, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie: 277-292. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2001. The postnational constellation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. 2004. Global governance and public accountability. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P. D. 2001. Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P. D. 2004. The role of business in the modern world: Progress, pressures and prospects for the market economy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 2001. Theories of the multinational enterprise. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business: 127-149. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Keim, G., D., & Schuler, D. 2004. Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30: 837-857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. 1998. Clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. 1999. Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53: 379-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & Salazar, de J. 2006. Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 75-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 235-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404-437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U.(Eds.) 2003. Providing global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, G. D. 2001. Business and public policy. Competing in the political market place. In M. Hitt, R. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management: 583-601. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, B. 2003. The international legal order. In P. Cane, & M. Tushnet (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legal studies: 271-297. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinley, D., & Tadaki, J. 2004. From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 44: 931-1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S. J. 2001. Sovereignity@bay: Globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business: 181-205. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24: 64-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. 1970. The dangers of social responsibility. In T. Meloan, S. Smith & J. Wheatly (Eds.), Managerial marketing policies and decisions: 461-475. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor relations and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32: 817-835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. 1999. Late capitalism. 2nd ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2001. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. 1965. Class, citizenship and social development. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. 2005. Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30: 166-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. 1983. Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mörth, U. (Ed.) 2004. Soft law in governance and regulation: A interdisciplinary analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. 1996. The institutional embeddedness of economic activity. Advances in Strategic Management, 13: 163-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orentlicher, D. F., & Gelatt, T. A. 1993. Public law, private actors: The impact of human rights on business investors in China. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 14: 66-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts, E. W. 1995. The legitimacy of multinational corporations. In L. E. Mitchell (Ed.), Progressive corporate law: 247-279. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. 2006. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66: 71-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. 2008. Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33: 773-775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. 2002. The open corporation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C., & Braithwaite, J. 2003. Regulation. In P. Cane & M. Tushnet (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legal studies: 119-145. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke, W. H., & Deng, F., with Witte, J. M., Benner, T., Whitaker, B., & Gershman, J. 2000. Critical choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 1999. International norms and domestic change: Arguing and communicative behaviour in the human rights area. Politics and Society, 27: 529-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 2002. Transnational actors and world politics. In W. von Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations: 255-274. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 2004. Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39: 288-313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach, B. 2005. A primer on multinational corporations. In A. D. Chandler & B. Mazlish (Eds.), Leviathans. Multinational corporations and the new global history: 19-44. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Romme, A. G. L. 1999. Domination, self-determination, and circular organizing. Organization Studies, 20: 801-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S., Simon, J., Vincent, J. R., MacLeod, W., Fox, M., & Thea, D. M. 2003. AIDS is your business. Harvard Business Review, 81(2): 80-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., & Moldoveanu, M. C. 2003. When will stakeholders act? An interest and identity-based model of stakeholder mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28: 204-219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. 2004. Reconstructing the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations 10: 499-531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. 2000. The end of globalization: A new and radical analysis of globalization and what it means for business. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, M. A. 2000. Profits and principles. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Economic integration, democracy and the welfare state. Journal of European Public Policy, 4: 18-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. & Butz, A. 2009. Internationales Management und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. In: M.-J. Oesterle & S. Schmid (Eds.), Internationales Management. Forschung, Lehre, Praxis: 731-759. Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. 2009. Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19 (3): 327-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility. Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1096-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (Eds.) 2008a. Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. 2008b. Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon & D. Siegel (Eds), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 413-431.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. 2006. Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 505-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Smid, M. 2000. The downward spiral and the U.S. Model Principles. Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world-wide social and environmental conditions. Management International Review, 40: 351-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. 1995. Levers of control. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. A., & Rehbein, K. 1995. Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 659-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1976. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. 2003. Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13: 503-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, B. 1995. Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21: 495-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, D. (Ed.) 2000. Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H. 2007. Corporate ethics and globalization – Global rules and private actors. In G. Hanekamp (Ed.), Business ethics of innovation: 7-26. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., & Scherer, A. G. (Hrsg.) 1998. Zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus. Philosophische Grundlagenprobleme des interkulturellen Managements. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., & Scherer, A. G. 2000. Corporate ethics and management theory. In P. Koslowski (Ed.), Contemporary economic ethics and business ethics: 148-192. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., & Scherer, A. G. 2003. Managing the multinational enterprise in a world of different cultures: Some fundamental remarks on the pluralism of cultures and its managerial consequences. In M. Ricciardelli, S. Urban & K. Nanopoulos (Eds.), Globalization and multicultural societies: 75-101. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. 1983. A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review, 8: 90-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 35-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15: 350-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., & Ticoll, D. 2003. The naked corporation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. M. 2004. Thicker than blood: Holding Exxon Mobil liable for human rights violations committed abroad. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 31: 274-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 1994. Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 113-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. 2000. Integrative economic ethics – Towards a conception of socio-economic rationality. In P. Koslowski (Ed.), Contemporary economic ethics and business ethics: 37-54. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagts, D. F. 2003. The UN norms for transnational corporations. Leiden Journal of International Law, 16: 795-802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. J. 2005. Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47 (Summer 2005): 19-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. 2005. Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30: 426-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. D. 2003. Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29: 859-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B. 1980. Imperialism: Pioneer of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayman, F. W. & Diehl, P. R. 1994. Reconstructing Realpolitik. An empirically based critique of realism. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbrodt, D. & Kruger, M. 2003. Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. The American Journal of International Law, 97: 901-922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A., Rands, G., & Godfrey, P. O. 2002. What are the responsibilities of business to society? In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management: 373-408. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H., & Willke, G. 2008. Corporate moral legitimacy and the legitimacy of morals: A critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1): 27-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O. F. 2004. The UN global compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14: 755-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. 2004. Responsibility and global labor justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12: 365-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. 2002. From interdependence to globalization. In W. von Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations: 235-254. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Andreas Georg Scherer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guido Palazzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Butz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Reinhard Moser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G., Butz, A. (2009). Die neue politische Rolle von Unternehmen in einer globalisierten Welt – Ein Überblick über die Forschungslandschaft. In: Moser, R. (eds) Internationale Unternehmensführung. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8431-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation