Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fokussierung von Organisationaler Energie

  • Chapter
Organisationale Energie

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • 2531 Accesses

Auszug

Neben der Aktivierung liegt eine entscheidende Managementaufgabe und -kompetenz in der Fokussierung, d.h. in der gezielten gemeinsamen Ausrichtung und Koordination der Kräfte auf bestimmte Kernaktivitäten. Ein Merkmal produktiver Energie ist die gemeinsame Kanalisierung von Anstrengung, Aufmerksamkeit und Begeisterung auf die entscheidenden Ziele und Aufgaben des Unternehmens. Führungskräfte beeinflussen damit entscheidend die Qualitätsdimension der Energie, d.h. das Ausmaß, in dem die Potenziale auf die gemeinsamen Ziele ausgerichtet sind, und sichern eine produktive Nutzung der aktivierten Kraftreserven in Transformationssituationen. Bei dieser Fokussierung von Energien wird berücksichtigt, dass die Mobilisierung zwar eine Einsatzbereitschaft herstellt, diese jedoch weder besonders gerichtet, noch — und das ist mindestens genauso wichtig — wirklich verbindlich ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Prahalad, C. K./ Hamel, G. (1990): The core competence of the corporation, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, S. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger W./ Homp C. (1997): Kernkompetenz-Management: Steigerung von Flexibilität und Schlagkraft im Wettbewerb, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Ghoshal, S. (2004): A Bias for action. How effective managers harness their willpower, achieve results, and stop wasting their time, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, K. (1998): Charisma in action: The transformational abilities of Virgin’s Richard Branson and ABB’s Percy Barnevik; in: Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 26, S. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995): Why transformation efforts fail, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, S. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Vogel, B. (2003): Organisationale Energie — Konstrukt und Ansätze für das Management, in: PSP Portrait Schweizer Personaldienstleistungsunternehmen, Zürich, S. 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1960): Notes on the concept of commitment, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 66, S. 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T./ Porter, L. W./ Steers, R. M. (1982): Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover, New York et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P./ Herscovitch, L. (2001): Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model, in: Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 11, S. 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P./ Allen, N. J. (1991): A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, in: Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 1, S. 61–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P./ Allen N. J./ Smith, C. A. (1993): Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension of a test of a three-component conceptualization, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, S. 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P./ Allen, N. J. (1997): Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application, Thousand Oaks, CA, et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A./ Latham, G. P./ Erez, M. (1988): The determinants of goal commitment, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, S. 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M./ Eisenstat, R. A. (2004): How to have an honest conversation about your business strategy, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83, S. 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1997): What is it for us to intent?, in: Holmström-Hintikka, G./ Tuomela, R. (Hrsg.), Contemporary action theory, Vol. 2: Social Action, Dordrecht et al, S. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1968): Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in Utopian communities, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, S. 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, N. (2000): Mentale Modelle als Basis von Implementierungsstrategien: Konzepte für ein erfolgreiches Change Management, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.H. (1993): The link between individual and organizational learning, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 35, Fall, S. 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A./ Burke Rochford jr., E./ Worden, S. K./ Benford, R. D. (1986): Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement mobilization, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 51, S. 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J./ Rittman, A. L./ Marks, M. A. (2001): Team leadership, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 12, S. 451–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A./ Shaw, K. N./ Saari, L. M. (1981): Goal setting and task performance, in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 90, S. 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R./ Bonnevier-Tuomela, M. (1997): From social imitation to teamwork, in: Holmström-Hintikka, G./ Tuomela, R. (Hrsg.), Contemporary action theory, Vol. 2: Social action, Dordrecht u.a., S. 1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D./ Hinsz, V. B./ McCaul, H. S. (1987): The effects of commitment to performance goals on effort, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 17, S. 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, L. J./ Hopkins, L. J. (1998): Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 28, S. 1530–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. (1996): Commitment in Organisationen, Bern et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J./ Meyer, J. P. (1990): Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, S. 847–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L./ Rosen, B. (1999): Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, S. 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J./ Weber, T./ Kelloway, E.-K. (1996): Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, S. 827–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M./ MacKenzie, S. B./ Bommer, W. H. (1996): Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, bindung and organizational citizenship behaviors, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 22, S. 259–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huy, Q. N. (1999): Emotional capability, emotional intelligence and radical change; in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, S. 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1986): Organizational test of goal linkage theory., in: Journal of Occupational Behavior, Vol. 7, S. 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. E. (1993): Shared intention, in: Ethics, Vol. 104, S. 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1990): Collective intentions and actions, in: Cohen P. R./ Morgan J./ Pollack, M. (Hrsg.), Intentions in communication, S. 401–415, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Vogel, B. (2001): Continental 2001. Liberating entrepreneurial energy, Case Study an der Universität St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. R./ Williams, C. R./ Klein, H. J. (1989): An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, S. 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001): Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, in: Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, S. 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, D. L. (1984): Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, S. 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998): Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, 2. Aufl., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A./ Tannenbaum, S. I./ Salas, E./ Volpe, C. E. (1995): Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements; in: Guzzo, R. A./ Salas, E. et al (Hrsg.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco, S. 333–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A./ Medsker, G. J./ Higgs, A. C. (1993): Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups, in: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, S. 823–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C. C./ Chen, X./ Meindl, J. R. (1998): How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, S. 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R.D./ Hoy, W.K./ Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004): Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions, in: Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, S. 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J./ Blair, V./ Peterson, C./ Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy, in: Maddux, J. E. (Hrsg.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application, New York, S. 305–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999): Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, S. 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A. (1986): Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations, in: Goodman, P. S. (Hrsg.), Designing effective work groups, San Francisco, S. 34–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A./ Yost, P. R./ Campbell, R. J./ Shea, G. P. (1993): Potency in groups: Articulating a construct, in: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 32, S. 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, M. L./ Knight, P. A. (1994): The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, S. 755–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. B./ Chemers, M. M./ Preiser, N. (2001): Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis, in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 8, S. 1057–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G./ Bliese, P. D. (2002): The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, S. 549–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982): Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, in: American Psychologist, Vol. 37, S. 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D.H./ Brass, D. J./ Thomas, J. B. (1995): Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective; in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, S. 645–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J./ Gualtieri, J./ Minionis, D. (1995): Task cohesion as a facilitator of group decision making under temporal urgency, in: Journal of Military Psychology, Vol. 7, S. 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, L. V. (2007): Grundlagen der Organisationspsychologie, 6. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J./ Cohen, R./ Burke, M. J./ McLendon, C. L. (2003): Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, S. 989–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Cole, M./ Vogel, B. (2004): Group mood convergence and the moderating effect of cohesion strength, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, F. (1987): The ecology of work groups; in: Lorsch, J. W. (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, S. 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huy Q. N. (2002): Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, S. 31–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, P. C./ Carron, A. V./ Pink, M. J./ Lane, A. M./ Jones, G./ Hall, M. (2000): Perceptions of group cohesion and mood in sport teams, in: Group Dynamics: Theory and Practice, Vol. 4, S. 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E./ Mael, F. (1989): Social identity theory and the organization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, S. 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B./ House, R. J./ Arthur, M.B. (1993): The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory, in: Organizational Science, Vol. 4, S. 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2006): Leadership in organizations, 6. Aufl., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. I./ Sosik, J. J. (2002): Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance, in: Small Group Research, Vol. 33, S. 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder, P. (2001): Vertrauen ist gut — Kontrolle ist besser — Wege zu einer Vertrauenskultur, in: Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 53. Jg., H. 2, S. 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüegg-Stürm, J./ Young (2001): Die Bedeutung neuer netzwerkartiger Führungs-und Organisationsformen für die Dynamisierung von Unternehmungen; in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 55. Jg., S. 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Fokussierung von Organisationaler Energie. In: Organisationale Energie. uniscope. Die SGO-Stiftung für praxisnahe Managementforschung. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8043-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation