We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Mobilisierung von Energie durch Bedrohungen | SpringerLink

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Mobilisierung von Energie durch Bedrohungen

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Organisationale Energie

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • 2534 Accesses

Auszug

Die Mobilisierung der emotionalen, kognitiven und handlungsbezo-genen Potenziale und die Ausrichtung auf zentrale Schwerpunkte sind vor allem Aufgabe des Top-Managements.

Vgl. Bruch/Vogel (2006); Tushman/O’Reilly (1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Tushman, M. L./ O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996): Ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, in: California Management Review, Vol. 38, S. 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeken, M. A. (1997): Organisationsveränderungen und das Konzept der Mobilisierung, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1968): The active society. A theory of societal and political processes, London und New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, W. G./ Parker-Gwin, R. (1999): How many logics of collective action?, in: Theory and Society, Vol. 28, S. 203–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A./ Merry, U. (1986): Organizational transformation, New York, S. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M./ Whipp, R. (1993): Managing change for competitive success, Oxford und Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, P./ Glick, W. H./ Huber, G. P. (2001): Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, S. 937–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R./ Weick, K. (1984): Toward a model of organizational systems as interpersonal systems, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, S. 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J./ Salancik, G. (1978): The external control of organizations: A resource dependence view, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E./ Jackson, S. (1987): Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, S. 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Ghoshal, S. (2003): Unleashing organizational energy, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, Fall, S. 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1996): Sensemaking in organizations, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A./ Thomas, J. (1996): Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, S. 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J./ Grover, S. L./ Blonder, M. D. (1988): Predictors of survivors’ job involvement following layoffs: A field study, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 73, S. 436–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S./ Folkman, S. (1984): Stress, appraisal, and coping, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S. G. (2002): The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, S. 644–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E./ Cacioppo, J. T./ Rapson, R. L. (1994): Emotional contagion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totterdell, P. (2000): Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams; in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, S. 848–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991): Emotion and adaptation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M./ Cropanzano, R. (1996): Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work, in: Research into Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18, S. 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. K./ Spreitzer, G. M. (1998): Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, S. 567–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huy, Q. N. (1999): Emotional capability, emotional intelligence and radical change; in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, S. 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huy Q. N. (2002): Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, S. 31–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E./ Duncan, R. (1987): The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic-issue diagnosis; in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, S. 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M./ Cropanzano, R. (1996): Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work, in: Research into Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18, S. 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H. (2003a): Leaders’ action. Model development and testing, München und Mering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H. (2003b): Lufthansa 2003. Energising a decade of change, Case Study an der Universität St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Ghoshal, S. (2000): Lufthansa 2000. Maintaining the change momentum, Case Study an der London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Ghoshal, S. (2002): Beware the busy manager, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Ghoshal, S. (2004): A Bias for action. How effective managers harness their willpower, achieve results, and stop wasting their time, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Sattelberger, T. (2001): Lufthansa’s transformation marathon — a process of liberating and focusing change energy, in: Human Resource Management, Vol. 40, S. 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E./ Jackson, S. (1987): Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, S. 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J./ Mendes, W. B. (2001): Challenge and threat appraisals, in: Forgas, J. P. (Hrsg.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social contagion, Cambridge, S. 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M./ Zhou, J. (2002): Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, S. 687–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Vogel, B. (2003): Organisationale Energie — Konstrukt und Ansätze für das Management, in: PSP Portrait Schweizer Personaldienstleistungsunternehmen, Zürich, S. 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C./ Backoff, R. W. (1997): Transforming organizations with second-order change, in: Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 10, S. 229–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1975): Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals, in: California Management Review, Vol. 18 S. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K./ Hamel, G. (1990): The core competence of the corporation, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, S. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996): Leading change, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Gerber, P. (2003): Krisenbewältigung mit System, in: Personalwirtschaft, Nr. 10, S. 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995): Why transformation efforts fail, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, S. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Vogel, B. (2001): Continental 2001. Liberating entrepreneurial energy, Case Study an der Universität St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Bieri, S. (2003a): Hilti 2003. Maintaining a proactive sense of urgency, Case Study an der Universität St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Königswieser, R./ Hillebrand, M. (2004): Einführung in die systemische Organisationsberatung, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995): Why transformation efforts fail, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, S. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947): Frontiers in group dynamics, in: Human Relations, Vol. 1, S. 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995): Why transformation efforts fail, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, S. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Mobilisierung von Energie durch Bedrohungen. In: Organisationale Energie. uniscope. Die SGO-Stiftung für praxisnahe Managementforschung. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8043-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics