Skip to main content

Organisationale Energie: Eine neue Perspektive für hoch produktive Unternehmen

  • Chapter
Organisationale Energie

Auszug

Eine Annäherung an das Konzept der Organisationalen Energie erfolgt am besten durch zwei kurze Beispiele.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bruch, H. (2003a): Leaders’ action. Model development and testing, München und Mering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H. (2003b): Lufthansa 2003. Energising a decade of change, Case Study an der Universität St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Ghoshal, S. (2004): A Bias for action. How effective managers harness their willpower, achieve results, and stop wasting their time, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H./ Vogel, B. (2003): Organisationale Energie — Konstrukt und Ansätze für das Management, in: PSP Portrait Schweizer Personaldienstleistungsunternehmen, Zürich, S. 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R./ Baker, W./ Parker, A. (2003): What creates energy in organizations?, in: Sloan Management Review, Summer, Vol. 44., S. 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H., COLE, M. S., VOGEL, B., & MENGES, J. (2007): Linking productive organizational energy to firm performance and individuals’ satisfaction. Beitrag präsentiert auf dem Academy of Management Meeting 2007, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A./ Merry, U. (1986): Organizational transformation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeken, M. A. (1997): Organisationsveränderungen und das Konzept der Mobilisierung, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, L. S. (1984): The flow state: A new view of organizations and managing, in: Adams, J.D. (Hrsg.), Transforming work: A collection of organizational transformation readings, Alexandria, VA, S. 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, H. (1983): Facilitating organization transformation, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L./ O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996): Ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, in: California Management Review, Vol. 38, S. 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, L. S. (1984): The flow state: A new view of organizations and managing, in: Adams, J.D. (Hrsg.), Transforming work: A collection of organizational transformation readings, Alexandria, VA, S. 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, H. (1983): Facilitating organization transformation, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A./ Merry, U. (1986): Organizational transformation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L./ O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996): Ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, in: California Management Review, Vol. 38, S. 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A./ Merry, U. (1986): Organizational transformation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M. (1983): Managing Strategic Change, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L./ O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996): Ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, in: California Management Review, Vol. 38, S. 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M./ Stein, B. A./ Jick, D. T. (1992): The “big three” model of change, in: Kanter, R. M./ Stein, B. A./ Jick, D. T. (Hrsg.), The challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it, New York, S. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995): Why transformation efforts fail, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, S. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M./ Whipp, R. (1993): Managing change for competitive success, Oxford und Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (2000): Linking change processes to outcomes: A commentary on Ghoshal, Bartlett and Weick, in: Beer, M./ Nohria, N. (Hrsg.), Breaking the code of change, Boston, S. 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaugg, R. J./ Thom, N. (2003): Excellence through implicit competencies: Human resource management — organizational development — knowledge creation, in: Journal of Change Management, Vol. 3, S. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D./ Claydon, T./ Doyle, M. (1999): Organisation development and change: The legacy of the nineties, in: Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 9, S. 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süll, D.H. (1999): Why good companies go bad, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, S. 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L./ O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996): Ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, in: California Management Review, Vol. 38, S. 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M./ Bateman, T. S. (1997): Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18, S. 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W./ Brandes, P./ Dharwadkar, R. (1998): Organizational cynicism, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, S. 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C./ Leuer, M. P. (1997): The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. W. III./ Greenwood, J. W. Jr. (1979): Managing executive stress, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H. (1972): Organizational diagnosis, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Organisationale Energie: Eine neue Perspektive für hoch produktive Unternehmen. In: Organisationale Energie. uniscope. Die SGO-Stiftung für praxisnahe Managementforschung. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8043-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics