Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovationen

  • Chapter
Regionales Unternehmertum

  • 1684 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl das Verhältnis zwischen Innovationen und Entrepreneurship nie vollständig erklärt werden konnte, bleiben sie dennoch im Mittelpunkt des unternehmerischen Pro zesses, wie wir an Schumpeters Definition des Unternehmers sehen können (Krueger, 2007 [42]). Zudem ist innovatives Verhalten ein wichtiger Faktor, um Unternehmen voneinan der abzugrenzen. Eines der Probleme, die das Verständnis von Innovationen erschweren, besteht in der Schwierigkeit, sich Innovation als einen andauernden Prozess vorzustellen. Dies zeigt sich auch in der Theorie des stationären Zustandes, die von Denkern wie John Stuart Mill im 19. Jahrhundert und Simon Kuznets im 20. Jahrhundert entwickelt wurde und die eine Begrenzung des ewigen Wandels und daher der Innovation postuliert. Die Zahl der möglichen Kombinationen bleibt jedoch unendlich, wie Montesquieu mit dem Beispiel der ständig wechselnden Mode anfügte. Innovation ist ein Kernelement in einer strategischen, auf Ressourcen und Fähigkeiten basierenden Herangehensweise und somit die Voraussetzung für lokale und globale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Kleine Unternehmen und Regionen müssen in einem veränderten wirtschaftlichen Klima in Zeiten der Globalisie rung Innovationen einführen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

LITERATUR

  1. Abernathy, W./Utterback, J. (1978): Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review (80), 41–7. Acs, J.Z./Audretsch, D.B. (1990): Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acs, J.Z./Audretsch, D.B./Braunerhjelm, P./Carlsson, B. (2005b): ‘The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship’, Discussion paper no. 5326, Center for Economic Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akrich, M., Callon, M./Latour, B. (1988): ‘À quoi tient le succès des innovations? Premier épisode: l’art de l’intéressement’, Gérer et comprendre, 11, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alter, N. (2003): ‘innovation organisationnelle. Entre croyance et raison’, in Mustar, P. and Penan, H. (Hrsg.), Encyclopédie de l’innovation (71–88), Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amar, A.D. (2001): ‘Leading for innovation through symbiosis’, European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arvanitis, S., Bolli, TH., Hollenstein, H., ley, M., Wòrter, M. (2008) : Innovationsaktivitàten in der Schweizer Wirtschaft - Eine Analyse der Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 2008, Strukturberichterstattung Nr. 46, Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft SECO, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avenier, MJ. (2001) : Ingénierie des pratiques collectives, Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baldwin, J./Gellatly, G. (2003): Innovation Strategies and Performance in Small Firms, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldegger, R.J, (2008): Entrepreneurial Strategy and Innovation, Growth-Publisher, Fribourg/Bern/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barreyre, PY. (1975): Stratégie d’innovation dans les moyennes et petites industries, Paris: Éditions Hommes et techniques.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Branbadere L. (1998): Le management des idées: de la créativité à l’innovation, Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callon, M. (1995): L’innovation technologique et ses mythes. In La recherche sur l’innovation, une boíte de Pandore?, Montréal: Les cahiers scientifiques de l’ACFAS.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Capt, D. (994): ‘Demande de biens différenciés, comportements spatiaux et diversification de l’activité des exploitations agricoles’, doctoral thesis, Université de Franche-Comté, Dijon.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carrier, C. (1997): De la créativité à l’intrapreneuriat, Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cerisier, C./Lubot, A.(1992): L’inertie de la firme, Paris: ESCP-EAP Chalmers, A.F (1994), What Is This Thing Called Science? St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chesbrough, H.W. (2002): Open Innovation - The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting form Technology, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Choo, C.W. (1998): The Knowing Organization - How Organization Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decision, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Corriveau, G. (1997): Sur la piste du Projet Mini Z, Rapport de recherche portant sur l’étude expérimentale d’un mode de gestion de projet dans une grande firme et un groupe de PME fournisseurs, Institut de recherche sur les PME, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dakhli, M./De Clercq, D. (2004): ‘Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi- country study’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(2), 107–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dewar, R./Dutton, J.(1986): ‘The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis’, Management Science, 32(11), 1422–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dosi, G. (1988): ‘Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature, 26(2), 157–78.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eisenhardt, E. (1990): ‘Speed and strategic choice: how managers accelerate decision making’, California Management Review, 32(3), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Epifanio, R. (1995): ‘Innovazioni techologiche e dimensione di impresa: una interpretazione’, Piccola Impresa, 1, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman, M.P (1994): ‘Knowledge complementary and innovation’, Small Business Economics, 6(3), 363–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gagnon, YC./Toulouse, J.M. (1993): ‘Adopting new technologies: an entrepreneurial act’, Technovation, 13(7), 411–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gartner, W.B./Carter, N.M./Hills, GE. (2003): ‘The language of opportunity’, in Steyaert, C. and Hjorth, D. (Hrsg.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship (103–24), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gassmann, O. (2010): Crowdsourcing - Ideen der Masse für eigene Produkte nutzen, Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Giddens, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hamberg, D. (1966), R & D. Essays on the Economic of Research and Development, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hamel, G./Pralahad, C.K. (1994): Competing for the Future, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hedstrom, P./Sandell, R./Stern, C. (2000): ‘Mesolevel networks and the diffusion of social movement, The case of Swedish Democratic Party’, American Journal of Sociology, cited in Rueff, M. (2002), ‘Strong ties, weak ties, and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation’ Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427–50.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hills, G.E./Shrader, R.C./Lumpkin, G.T. (1999): Opportunity recognition as a creative process’, paper presented at Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, May.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hoffman, K./Parejo, M./Bessant, J./Perren, L. (1998): ‘Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review’, Technovation, 18(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Howe, J. (2009): Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, Verlag Random House Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huston, L., Sakkab, N. (2006): Wie Procter & Gamble zu neuer Kreativitàt fand, in: Harvard Business Manager, August, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jewkes, J./Sawers, D./Stillerman, R. (1969): The Sources of Invention, New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Julien, PA./Raymond, L./Jacob, R./Abdul-Nour, G. (2003): ‘The network enterprise. Ten years’ experience of the Bombardier Chair, 1993–2003’, paper presented at the 33th European International Small Business Conference, Milan,10–12 September.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Julien, P.A./Joyal, A./Deshaies, L./Ramangalahy, C. (1997): ‘A typology of strategic behaviour among small and medium-sized exporting businesses: a case study’, International Small Business Journal, 15(2), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Julien, PA./Carriere, J.B./Raymond, L./Lachance, R. (1994): ‘La gestion du changement technologique dans les PME manufacturières au Québec: une analyse de cas multiples’, Revue internationale P.M.E., 7(3–4), 87–120.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kiesler, S./Sproull, L.(1982): ‘Managerial response to changing environments: perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(5), 548–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kleinknecht, A./Poot, T.P./Reijnen, J.O.N. (1991): ‘Technical performance and firms size: survey results from the Netherlands’, in Acs, J.Z. and Audretsch, D.B. (Hrsg.), Innovations and Technological Change: An International Comparaison, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Krueger, N.F. (2007): “What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking“, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31, no 1, p. 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lachman, J. (1996): Financer l’innovation dans les PME, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Laperche, B. (2003): ‘L’innovation: avec ou sans brevet?’, Innov.doc, La lettre du LRII (20), Université du Littoral Cote d’Opale.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Latour, B. (2003): ‘L’impossible métier de l’innovation technique’, in Mustar, P. and Penan, H. (Hrsg.), Encyclopédie de l’innovation (1–26), Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lenfle, S./Midler, C.(2003): ‘Management de projet et innovation’, in Mustar, P. and Penan, H. (Hrsg.), Encyclopédie de l’innovation (49–69), Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Leonard, D./Sensiper, S.(1998): ‘The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation’, California Management Review, 40(3), 112–26.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lipsey, R. (1996): communication to the Benefactors Lecture, Vancouver, 6 November.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Long, W./McMillan, W.E. (1984): ‘Mapping the new venture opportunity identification process’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, 567–90.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mangematin, V. (2003): ‘PME de biotechnologie: plusieurs business models en concurrences in Mustar, P. and Penan, H. (Hrsg.), Encyclopédie de l’innovation (539–52), Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mansfield, E. (1968): Industrial Research and Technological Innovation, New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Marchesnay, M. (2001): ‘Management: les constructeurs: Michael Porter’, Revue Française de Gestion (4), 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Médus, J.L./Pacitto, J.C. (1994): ‘L’innovation technologique dans la TPE: un premier bilan’, working paper no. 94–11, Université Paris Val-de-Marne.

    Google Scholar 

  54. MIFE (French Department of Industrie, Finances and Economie) (2001): La R&D industrielle. Une clé pour l’avenir. Six cas exemplaires d’entreprises, Paris: Les éditions de l’Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Miles, G.,/Heppard, K.A./Miles, R.E./Snow, C.C. (2000): Entrepreneurial strategy’, in Meyer, G.D./Heppard K.A. (Hrsg.) (2000): Entrepreneur ship as Strategy (101–14), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Montesquieu, C.-L. D. S. (1988): Perserbriefe; aus dem Franzosischen von Jürgen von Stackelberg. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mustar, P. (1997): ‘Recherche, innovation et création d’entreprise’, in Simon, Y. and Joffre, P. (Hrsg.), Encyclopédie de gestion, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Nonaka, I. (1994): ‘A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’, Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nonaka, I.R./Takeuchi, H. (1995): The Knowledge Creating Company, New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nooteboom, B. (2000): Learning an Innovation in Organization and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nooteboom, B. (1994): innovation and diffusion in small firms. Theory and evidence’, Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. OECD (2005): The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition OECD, EUROSTAT. Published by : OECD Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  63. Owosu, Y.A. (1999): importance of employee involvement in world-class agile management systems’, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(2), 107–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pavitt, K./Robson, M./Townsend, J. (1987): ‘The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(2), 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Penrose, E.T. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Pras, B./Le Nagard-Assayad, E. (2003): innovation et marketing stratégique’, in Mustar, P. and Penan, H. (Hrsg.), Encyclopédie de l’innovation (255–280), Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rogers, E.V. (1962 [2003]): Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rolfo, S./Calabrese, G.(1995): ‘Small innovative firms in Southern Italy’, Piccola Impresa, 3, 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Salomon, J.J. (1992): Le destin technologique, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Santarelli, E./StErlacchini, A. (1990): ‘Innovation formal vs. informal R&D, and firms size: some evidence form Italian manufacturing’, Small Business Economics, 2(3), 223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Saxenian, A. (1994): Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Scherer, F.M. (1984): Innovation an Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schumpeter, J.A. (1924): Epochen der Dogmen- und Methodengeschichte, übersetzt in Franzosisch durch Bousquet, G.H. in 1962,Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Senge, P. (1990): ‘The leader’s new work: building learning organizations’, Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  75. SESSI (Service des Études et des Statistiques Industrielles) (1999): L’état des PMI, Paris: French Department of Industry, Finances and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Shane, S. (2005): Finding Fertile Ground: Indentifying Extraordinary Opportunities for New Ventures, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Shane, S. (2003): ‘What are universities the locus of inventions in Steyaert, C. and Hjorth, D. (Hrsg.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship (145–59), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Simon, H. (2007): Hidden Champions des 21. Jahrhunderts : Die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktfüher, Frankfurt/New York, Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  79. St-Pierre, J. (2004): La gestion du risque. Comment améliorer le financement des PME et faciliter leur développement, Québec: Les Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Strang, D./Meyer, J.(1993): ’Institutional conditions for diffusions Theory and Society, 22, 487–511, cited in Ruef, M. (2002), ‘Strong ties, weak ties, and islands: Structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427–50.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tarondeau, JC. (2002): Le management des savoirs, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Trépanier, M./Ippersiel, M.P./Martineau, Y./Szczepanik, G. (2004): ‘Les CCTT et le soutien technologique aux entreprises’, research report, Institut national de recherche scientifique Urbanisation, Culture et Société Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Von Hippel, E. (1988): The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Witt, U. (1993): ‘Turning Austrian economics into an evolutionary theory’, in Cadwell, P.J. and Boerch, J. (Hrsg.), Austrian Economics: Tension and New Direction, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rico Baldegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre-André Julien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baldegger, R., Julien, PA. (2011). Innovationen. In: Regionales Unternehmertum. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6550-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation