Skip to main content

Supply Network Configuration Benchmarking: Framework Development and Application in the Indian Automotive Industry

  • Chapter
Essays on Purchasing and Supply Management

Part of the book series: Essays on Supply Chain Management ((ESCM))

  • 2033 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a benchmarking framework for the analysis of the supply network configuration of companies and exemplifies its applications in the Indian automotive sector.

Design/methodology/approach – We combine elements of relationship and network theories from different research streams to develop a three level supply network configuration benchmarking framework including a dyadic, supply chain and network perspective. The analysis of two case companies shows the differences of supply networks in emerging markets depending on strategies and institutional context.

Findings – Our framework works well with the two case studies presented. A major player in the Indian automotive industry is benchmarked against a newcomer in this emerging country. The results can be used to improve each firm’s supplier base management approach and create more efficiency in their further development.

Research limitations/implications – The framework is based on a profound theoretical foundation and worked well in the case example. Further research should apply the framework using more cases and also different industries.

Practical implications – Our benchmarking framework provides a powerful tool for supply chain managers to analyze their current supply networks and identify potential areas for improvement or collaboration with other buying companies. Through benchmarks across companies or across countries new entrants can learn from more advanced players or from experiences of their own organizations in other emerging markets.

Originality/value – This paper builds on current theories to develop a benchmarking framework for supply network configuration analysis combining the dyadic, chain and network level into one framework. The case example exemplifies its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., Hakansson, H., and Johanson, J. (1994), “Dyadic business relationships within a business network context”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, P. (1992), “Analysing Distribution Channel Dynamics: Loose and Tight Coupling in Distribution Networks”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 26 No.2, pp. 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batt, P. J. and Purchase, S. (2004), “Managing collaboration within networks and relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.33 No. 3, pp. 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidault, F., Despres, C. and Butler, C. (1998), “The drivers of cooperation between buyers and suppliers for product innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 26 No. 7–8, pp. 719–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. and Turnbull, P. W. (1998), “Adaptations in buyer-seller relationships”, in Naude, P. and Turnbull, P.W. (Eds.), Network dynamics in international marketing, Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp. 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhman, C., Kekre, S. and Singhal, J. (2005), “Interdisciplinary and interorganizational research: Establishing the science of enterprise networks”, Production & OperationsManagement, Vol. 14 No. 40, pp. 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, D. N., Dobler, W. D. and Starling, S. L. (2003), World class supply management: The key to supply chain management (7th ed.), McGraw-Hill/Irvin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T.Y., Dooley, K.J. and Rungtusanatham, M. (2001), “Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y. and Hong, Y. (2002), “Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. and Juttner, U. (2000), “Developing strategic partnerships in the supply chain: a practitioner perspective” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2004), “The art of the possible: relationship management in power regimes and supply chains”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A. and Pedersen, A.-C. (2002), “Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models – A comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. S. (2008), “Towards a better understanding of partnership attributes: An exploratory analysis of relationship type classification”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H. and Oh, S. (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1996), “Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998), “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. (1996), “The use ofthe case study method in logistics research”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 93–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997), “Manifesto for a relational sociology”, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103 No. 2, pp. 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Hakansson, H. and Snehota, I. (2003), Managing business relationships (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, G. L. (1983), “Interorganizational Exchange Behavior in Marketing Channels: A Broadened Perspective” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47No.4, pp.68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost & Sullivan Growth Consulting. (2007). Vehicle forecasting – Passenger cars & utility vehicles, commercial-vehicles, three-wheelers & tractors’. Bosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E. and Hakansson, H.(2001), Supply network strategies, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E. and Snehota, I.(2000), “Making the most of supplier relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29No.4, pp.305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984), The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffm, K., Lemke, F.and Szwejczewski, M.(2006), “An exploratory study of ’close’ supplier-manufacturer relationships”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24No.2, pp.189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin, K., Szwejczewski, M.and New, C.(1997), “Managing suppliers: When fewer can mean more”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 27No.7/8, pp.422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golicic, S. L. and Mentzer, J. T.(2005), “Exploring the drivers of interorganizational relationship magnitude”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 26No.2, pp.47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C. M. (1996), “Supply Chain Management: Relationships, Chains and Networks”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 7No.1, pp.63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. (2003), “Globalization and supply chain networks: the auto industry in Brazil and India”, Global Networks, Vol. 3No.2, pp.121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo, C. C. and Cillan, J. G.(2004), “The interaction of dependence and trust in long-term industrial relationships”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38No.8, pp.974–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahre, M. and Fabbe-Costes, N.(2005), “Adaptation and adaptability in logistics networks”, International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, Vol. 8No.2, pp.143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. (1988), “On strategic networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9No. l, pp.31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapfel Jr, R. K., Salmond, D.and Spekman, R.(1991), “A Strategic Approach to Managing Buyer-Seller Relationships”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25No.9, pp.22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., Stock, J. R. and Ellram, L. M. (1998), Fundamentals of logistics management, Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R., Johnsen, T., Zheng, J.and Harland, C.(2000), “An initial classification of supply networks”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 20No.6, pp.675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. and Greenwood, M. R.(1998), “Developing co-operative buyer- supplier relationships: A case study of Toyota”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 35No.3, pp.331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockamy, A. and McCormack, K.(2004), “Linking SCOR planning practices to supply chain performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24No.12, pp.1192–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclvor, R. and Humphreys, P.(2004), “The implications of electronic b2b intermediaries for the buyer-supplier interface”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24No.3, pp.241–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, C. (2004), “The economics of hybrid organizations”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 160No.3, pp.345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, C. R. and Speh, T. W.(2003), “Evaluating the relationship between questionable business practices and the strength of supply chain relationships”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 24No.2, pp.1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, K. and Wilson, D. T.(1995), “Introduction: Interaction and networks in perspective”, in Moeller, K.and Wilson, D. T.(Eds.), Business marketing: An interaction and network perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Naslund, D. (2002), “Logistics needs qualitative research—especially action research”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 32No.5, pp.321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, S. R. (1995), “Interorganizational information systems and the structure and climate of seller-buyer relationships”, Information & Management, Vol. 28No.2, pp.89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A. (2004), “Skills Development and Interfirm Learning Linkages under Globalization: Lessons from the Indian Automobile Industry”, World Development, Vol. 32No.7, pp.1265–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. F. and Ellram, L. M.(1997), “Buyer-supplier relationships: alternative research approaches” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 3No.4, pp.221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploetner, O. and Ehret, M.(2006), “From relationships to partnerships—new forms of cooperation between buyer and seller”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 35 No. l, pp.4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R. (1995), “WANTED: A Good Network Theory of Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40 No.2, pp.345–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar, S., Nargundkar, S.and Daley, M.(2006), “Inter-organizational information sharing: The role of supply network configuration and partner goal congruence”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 174No.2, pp.744–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2004), “Reflections of a half-century of organizational sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30 No. l, pp.1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srai, J. S. and Gregory, M.(2008), “A supply network configuration perspective on international supply chain development”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 28 No.5, pp.386–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, P., & Court, B. H.(1996). Profitable purchasing strategies. A manager’s guide for improving organizational competitiveness through the skills of purchasing. London, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L. W. and Reve, T.(1980), “Distribution Channels as Political Economies: A Framework for Comparative Analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44 No.3, pp.5264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (1997), “Supply-chain operations reference model (SCOR): the first cross- industry framework for integrated supply-chain management”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 10 No.2, pp.62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, I., Deckert, P., McCutcheon, D.M.and Kunst, R.(1998), “Case study: a leveraged learning network”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39No.4, pp.81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weele, A. J. (2005), Purchasing & supply chain management: Analysis, strategy, planning and practice (5th ed.), Thomson Learning, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N.and Frohlich, M.(2002), “Case research in operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No.2, pp.195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M. and Bode, C.(2006), “An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability”, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 12 No.6, pp.301312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, I. and Young, L.(2002), “On cooperating: firms, relations and networks”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55No.2, pp.123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36No.2, pp.269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1995), “Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory”, in Williamson, O. E.(Ed.), Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond (Expanded Edition ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, K.-S. and Ennew, C. T.(2004), “Business-to-business relationship quality”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38No.9/10, pp.1252–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003), Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.), Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moser, R., Kern, D., Wohlfarth, S., Hartmann, E. (2011). Supply Network Configuration Benchmarking: Framework Development and Application in the Indian Automotive Industry. In: Essays on Purchasing and Supply Management. Essays on Supply Chain Management. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6227-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics