Zusammenfassung
In last decades, there has been an enormous theoretical as well as practical debate on concepts of consumer misbehavior, which also included the purchase of counterfeit goods, due to the increasing economic importance of this illicit market. Counterfeits constitute an important economic, political and social issue [12], [73].
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatuer
[1] Aaker, D. A. (1991): Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: Free Press.
[2] Ang, S. H./Cheng, P. S./Lim, E.A.C./Tambyah, S. K. (2001): Spot the difference: consumer responses towards counterfeits, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 219–235.
[3] Bamossy, G./Scammon D. L. (1985): Product Counterfeiting: Consumers and Manufacturers Beware, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 334–340.
[4] Bearden, W. O./Etzel, M. J. (1982): Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, pp. 183–194.
[5] Bearden, W. O./Netemeyer, R. G./Teel, J. E. (1989): Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence, in: The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 473–481.
[6] Belk, R.W. (1985): Materialism: Traits aspects of living in the material world, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, pp. 265–280.
[7] Belk, R.W. (1988): Possessions and the Extended Self, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 139-168.
[8] Benarrosh-Dahan, E. (1991): Le contexte lexicologique du luxe, in: Revue Française du Marketing, Vol. 132/133, No. 2-3, pp. 45-54.
[9] Bian, Q. & Forsythe, S. Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, Available online 27 December 2011.
[10] Bian, X./Mouthino, L. (2009): An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, pp. 368–378.
[11] Bian, X./Mouthino, L. (2011): The role of brand image, product involvement, and knowledge in explaining consumer purchase behaviour of counterfeits: Direct and indirect effects, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, No. 1/2, pp. 191-216.
[12] Bian, X./Veloutsou, C. (2007): Consumers’ attitudes regarding non-deceptive counterfeit brands in the UK and China, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 211–222.
[13] Bian, X./Veloutsou, C: (2008): A cross-national examination of consumer perceived risk in the context of non-deceptive counterfeit brands, in: Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 7, pp. 3-20.
[14] Bush, R. F./Bloch, P. H./Dawson, S. (1989): Remedies for product counterfeiting, in: Business Horizons, January-February, pp. 59-65.
[15] Chaudhry, P./Stumpf, S. (2011): Consumer Complicity with Counterfeit Products, in: Journal of onsumer Marketing, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 139–151.
[16] Cordell, V. V./Wongtada, N./Kieschnick, R.L. (1996): Counterfeit Purchase Intentions: Role of Lawfulness Attitudes and Poduct Traits as Determinants, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 35, pp. 41–53.
[17] d’Astous, A./Gargouri, E. (2001): Consumer evaluations of brand imitations, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 1/2, pp. 153–167.
[18] de Matos, C./Augusto, C./Ituassu, T./Rossi, C. A. V. (2007): Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: a review and extension, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 36–47.
[19] Dittmar, H. (1994): Material possessions as stereotypes: Material images of different socioeconomic groups, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 561-585.
[20] Douglas, M./Isherwood, B. (1979): The world of goods. New York: Basic Books.
[21] Dubois, B./Laurent, G. (1994): Attitudes toward the concept of luxury: An exploratory analysis, in: Asia Pacific advances in consumer research, Vol. 1, pp. 273–278.
[22] Dubois, B./Laurent, G. (1996): The Functions of Luxury : A Situational Approach to Excursionism, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 470-477.
[23] Fauchois, A./Krieg. A. (1991): Le discours du luxe, in: Revue Française du Marketing, Vol. 132/133, No. 2-3, pp. 23-39.
[24] Fennell, G. G. (1978): Perceptions of the product-in-use situation, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 39-47.
[25] French, J. R. Jr./Raven, B. H. (1959): Bases of social power, in: Cartwright, D. (Ed.): Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
[26] Furnham, A./Valgeirsson, H. (2007): The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products, in: The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 36, pp. 677-85.
[27] Garfein, R. T. (1989): Cross-cultural perspectives on the dynamics of prestige, in: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 17-24.
[28] Green, R T./Smith, T. (2002): Countering brand counterfeiters, in: Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 89-106.
[29] Grossman, G.M./Shapiro, C. (1988): Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods, in: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 79–100.
[30] Groth, J./McDaniel, S.W. (1993): The exclusive value principle: The basis for prestige pricing, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 10, pp. 10–16.
[31] Ha, S./Lennon, S. (2006): Purchase intent for fashion counterfeit products: Ethical ideologies, ethical judgments, and perceived risks, in: Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 297-315.
[32] Hirschman, E. C./Holbrook, M. B. (1982): Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, pp. 92–101.
[33] Hirschman, E. C. (1988): Upper class WASPs as consumers: A humanistic inquiry, in: Hirschman, E. (Ed.): Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 3, pp. 115-148. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
[34] Hoe, L./Hogg, G./Hart S. (2003): Fakin’ it: Counterfeiting and consumer contradictions, in: European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, pp. 60-67.
[35] Holt, D. B. (1995): How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22, pp. 1–16.
[36] ICC Counterfeiting Intelligence Bureau (2005): The International Anti-Counterfeiting Directory 2005 [accessed on June 9th 2011].
[37] Jamal, A./Goode, M. (2003): A study of the impact of self-image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction, in: Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 19, No. 6/7, pp. 482-492.
[38] Kim, J.-E./Cho, H. J./Johnson, K. P. (2009): Influence of moral affect, judgment, and intensity on decision making concerning counterfeit, gray-market, and imitation products, in: Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 211-226.
[39] Leibenstein, H. (1950): Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 64, pp. 183-207.
[40] London, E. (2003): Criminal remedies against counterfeiting, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 137–140.
[41] Lynn, M. (1991): Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature, in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 8, pp. 45–57.
[42] Mason, R. S. (1992): Modeling the demand for status goods. Working paper, Department of Business and Management Studies, University of Salford, U.K. New York: St Martin’s.
[43] McCarthy, E. J./Perreault, W. D., Jr. (1987): Basic marketing: A managerial approach. 9th ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
[44] McCracken, G. (1986): Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 71-84.
[45] Mehta, A. (1999): Using self-concept to assess advertising effectiveness, in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 81-89.
[46] Mick, D. G. (1986): Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 196-213.
[47] Midgley, D. F. (1983): Patterns of interpersonal information seeking for the purchase of a symbolic product, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 74-83.
[48] Nia, A. & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2000): Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands?,in: Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 485–497.
[49] O’Cass, A./Frost, H. (2002): Status brands: Examining the effects of non-product brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption, in: Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 7-88.
[50] O’Cass, A./Muller, T. E. (1999): A study of Australian materialistic values, product involvement and self-image/product-image congruency relationships for fashion clothing. Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial World Marketing Congress, Academy of Marketing Science.
[51] OECD (1998): The economic impact of counterfeiting, available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/11/2090589.pdf, Retrieve date: 23rd July 2010.
[52] Pantzalis, I. (1995): Exclusivity strategies in pricing and brand extension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
[53] Park, C. W./Jaworski, B. J./McInnis, D. J. (1986): Strategic brand concept-image management, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 135-145.
[54] Penz, E./Stöttinger, B. (2005): Forget the real thing-take the copy! An explanatory model for the volitional purchase of counterfeit products, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 32, pp. 568-75.
[55] Phau, I./Prendergast, G. (2000): Consuming luxury brands: The relevance of the “rarity principle.”, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 8, pp. 122–138.
[56] Phau, I./Teah, M. (2009): Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 15-27.
[57] Phau, I./Sequeira, M./Dix, S. (2009a): Consumers’ willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products, in: Direct Marketing: An International Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 262–281.
[58] Poddar, A./Foreman, J./Banerjee S./Scholder Ellen, P. (2011): Exploring the Robin Hood effect: Moral profiteering motives for purchasing counterfeit products, in: Journal of Business Research, Available online 29 October 2011.
[59] Puntoni, S. (2001): Self-identity and purchase intention: An extension of the theory of planned behavior, in: European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, pp. 130-134.
[60] Quelch, J. A. (1987): Marketing the premium product, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 38-45.
[61] Rao, A. R./Monroe, K. B. (1989): The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 351-357.
[62] Richins, M./Dawson, S. (1992): A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 303-316.
[63] Roux, E. (1995): Consumer evaluation of luxury brand extensions. EMAC Conference, May, ESSEC, Paris, France.
[64] Roux, E./Floch, J-M. (1996): Gérer l’ingérable: la contradiction interne de toute maison de luxe. Décisions Marketing, Vol. 9, No. 2-3, pp. 15-23.
[65] Schultz, P. W./Zelezny, L. C. (1999): Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 255-265.
[66] Sharma, P./Chan, R.Y.K. (2011): Counterfeit proneness: Conceptualisation and scale development, in: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 27, No. 5–6, pp. 602–626.
[67] Sheth, J. N./Newman, B. I./Gross, B. L. (1991): Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 22, pp. 159–170.
[68] Sirgy, M. J. (1982): Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 287-300.
[69] Sirgy, M. J./Johar, J. S. (1999): Toward an integrated model of self-congruity and functional congruity, in: European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4, pp. 252-256.
[70] Solomon, M. R. (1983): The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 319-329.
[71] Spangenberg, E. R./Voss, K.E./Crowley, A.E. (1997): Measuring the He-donic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitude: A Generally Applicable Scale, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 235–241.
[72] Stone, Robert N./Grønhaug, Kjell (1993): Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 39–50.
[73] Swami, V./Chamorro-Premuzic, T./Furnham, A. (2009): Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods, in: The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 38, pp. 820-825.
[74] Sweeney, J. C./Soutar, G. N. (2001): Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale, in: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 203–220.
[75] Tan, Benjamin (2002): Understanding Consumer Ethical Decision Making with Re-spect to Purchase of Pirated Software, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 96–111.
[76] Tsai, S. (2005): Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value, in: International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 429-454.
[77] Tynan, C./McKechnie, S./Chhuon, C. (2010): Co-creating value for luxury brands, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, pp. 1156–1163.
[78] Veloutsou, Cleopatra/Bian, Xuemei (2008): A Cross-National Examination of Con-sumer Preceived Risk in the Context of Non-Deceptive Counterfeit Brands, in: Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3–20.
[79] Verhallen, T. M./Robben, H. S. (1994): Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 15 (June), pp. 315-331.
[80] Verhallen, T. M. (1982): Scarcity and consumer choice behavior, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 299–321.
[81] Vida, I. (2007): Determinants of consumer willingness to purchase non-deceptive counterfeit products, in: Managing Global Transitions, Vol. 5, pp. 253-270.
[82] Vigneron, F./Johnson, L.W. (1999): A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior, in: Academy of Marketing Science Review, Vol. 1, pp. 1-15.
[83] Vigneron, F./Johnson, L. W. (2004): Measuring perceptions of brand luxury, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 11, No. 6, 484-506.
[84] Wall, D. S./Large, J. (2010): Jailhouse Frocks – Locating the Public Interest in Policing Counterfeit Luxury Fashion Goods, in: British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 1094–1116.
[85] Westbrook, R. A./Oliver, R. L. (1991: The dimensionality of consumption emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18, pp. 84–91.
[86] Wiedmann, K.-P./Hennigs, N./Klarmann, C. (2012): Luxury consumption in the trade-off between genuine and counterfeit goods: What are the consumers’ underlying motives and value-based drivers?, in: Journal of Brand Management, Advance online publication 2 March 2012.
[87] Wiedmann, K.-P./Hennigs, N./Siebels, A. (2007): Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: a cross-cultural framework, in: Academy of Marketing Science Review, Vol. 7, pp. 1-21.
[88] Wiedmann, K.-P./Hennigs, N./Siebels, A. (2009): Value-Based Segmentation of Luxury Consumption Behavior, in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 625–651.
[89] Wilke, Ricky/Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999): Brand imitation and its effects on innovation, competition, and brand equity, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 9-18.
[90] Yoo, B./Donthu, N./Lee, S. (2000): An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 195–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klarmann, C., Wiedmann, KP., Hennigs, N. (2013). Luxury Longing and Counterfeit Complicity: A Consumer Typology based on the Perception of Luxury Value and Counterfeit Risk. In: Wiedmann, KP., Hennigs, N. (eds) Luxury Marketing. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4399-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4399-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-4398-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-4399-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)