Abstract
As discussed throughout the dissertation, firms are able to profit from technological developments without having ownership. However, as with any public good, the absence of ownership of the invention means the innovating firm has limited options of protecting what they do not own against unintended use by legal means. Admittedly, they might obtain control over the project by assigning their own developers to work for an OSSDP. In turn, developers working in an OSSDP who earn salaries from the firm are also simultaneously embedded in organizational settings of the firm for which they work (Henkel 2009). By inserting their norms and beliefs, which partly reflect the employing firm's interest, into the OSSDP, these employees allow firms to (indirectly) influence the project’s trajectory – depending on the number of programmers assigned and their role on the project. Dahlander & O’Mahony (2011) consequently note that firms do not necessarily need to gain control over a project as long as they control individuals working on that project. This was the basis for the introduction of CBL and RDBC as means to supervise a project’s development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schaarschmidt, M. (2012). Open Source in Action II: Business Collaboration Within an Open Source Project. In: Firms in Open Source Software Development. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4143-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4143-5_5
Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-4142-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-4143-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)